Documents

Oral argument — Alba v. City of New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2026

It was the writer's doctors that said clean every day, clean the wound. But the Harlem hospital records say puncture wound and stab wound. … You have a claim for the period in which they continued the arrest after seeing the information that dissipates probable cause. That's correct. The detective reports indicate Lenahan had the video.

Oral argument — Jesensky v. A-Best Products

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The comments for Section 371 define a neutral place as a place in which both the person who does the act and the person who sustains the bodily harm have an equal right or privilege or absence of a right … Jasensky's father for roughly a four-month period during 1967. Not at shipping port, but at a Babcock & Wilcox steel mill.

Oral argument — United States v. Jewell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2021

We don't know for sure, because the court never gave an explanation period. Even after I told the judge, uh, he's not bound by the guidelines. … I I recognize the fact that the courts are not can say very little, but I would at least ask for some explanation or some analysis as to why a sentence was given, especially after the court had made comments

Oral argument — ESSEX ELECTRO ENGINEERS v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2011

I'm saying I think that the standard for this case and all cases, protests, is whether they acted rationally, whether they abused discretion, whether they acted illegally. … Paragraph 3.418, air transportability. You have lifting tie-down ring test and an air transportability test that ties in with all of those. Isn't this whole argument somewhat circular, though?

Oral argument — United States v. Jabree Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019

Clearly there was air. Clearly the air is plain. The question then becomes whether or not it affects the defendant's substantial rights. … Why didn't you act?

Oral argument — Village of Mundelin v. Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013

But because when Bush arrived at the park, he didn't see the defendant, we know that this 5-15 minute period that he spent looking around for him was a period of time during which the defendant was already … There's no accident, but the police officer, acting on a hunch, follows the vehicle for a reasonable period of time, sees no other evidence of impairment, no other traffic violations.

Oral argument — Trenches, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2014

They clean grease out of hoods, which is a strange business, but there you go. And they expected to have a certain level of coverage when they bought that policy. … This was a hoods-cleaning operation. If somebody got hurt, there are any number of things that could have come within this policy.

Oral argument — Leitner-Wise v. LWRC International, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2018

LWRC International The Patent Act of that time said, persons interested in the patent at the time when the suit was brought. … His office was broken into, his office was cleaned out.

Oral argument — Ashima James v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 31, 2014

Then what happened is she actually went back to work for a period of time, was having difficulties, and went out again. … And your very first comment to Counsel for Liberty, I think, is probably the most salient comment that I could make right now, and that is it doesn't matter because if this is a comorbid situation, which

Oral argument — LeeAnn Archuleta v. CCA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2020

questioning That she felt that Harley Lappin, the chief corrections officer for the company, a very very high-ranking Executive, when he grabbed her hand and kind of held it for an uncomfortably long period … Archuleta had a perfect record clean record of 20 years So why this sudden thought that she's going to need this for protection is It's very bizarre August 23rd this email gets forwarded to the outside

Oral argument — Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. SEC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2025

If it if it if it turned out that the Hobbs Act limitation period bars your facial challenge to the FINRA rules or SEC's approval of the FINRA rules. … I guess the point is that if there's if you can just bring facial challenges whenever, then there's never any either limitations period on the APA or repose under the Hobbs Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Cabello

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2022

It is inconsequential, as courts applying both the common law and Section 2 have held, that Rosemond's acts did not advance each element of the offense. … or abetting he he assisted he knew what he was doing he may have had he may not have been a professional dope dealer or an experienced one but he knew what he was up to and as you point out with the comments

Oral argument — Falen v. Illinois Department of Children and Family Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 20, 2014

He shows up to school every morning, happy, healthy, clean. Whenever the DCFS did go to the apartment, they said it was well-furnished, it was clean. … This isn't about how a 5-year-old would act. It's how a 5-year-old who knows his neighbors, who's at home asleep in his bed, would act.

Oral argument — United States v. Dana Brooks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2013

So this all happened in a very small time period. Judge Layton was very patient with the defendant. I'm not sure he had made an unequivocal request to represent himself. … I don't even want to comment on you're an accident investigator. And then I would ask the court to consider what the conversation was about.

Oral argument — Wright v. Department of Children & Family Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2025

I would agree with that, Your Honor And does not the Administrative Procedure Act apply to this case? … It does, Your Honor And so how can the agency adopt rules allowing hearsay when the Administrative Procedure Act says that the rules of evidence will apply?

Oral argument — People v. King

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2024

They constitute separate acts and with separate objectives. Control of the vehicle was complete. And then there was the subsequent act of forcing the driver to remain in the vehicle. … But it was one continuous act. Do you agree with that? No, I think our argument is it constitutes separate acts in this case. So, because the objectives were different.

Oral argument — People v. Zolliercoffer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2016

You know, it's not the clean case of Stoffel. … If he had wanted to treat them as one, what he said was, oh, you know, we've got to clean up this other mess with the PCP.

Oral argument — Americas Collectibles v. Sterling Commerce

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2020

Well, it seems to me in reading it, it is more like a comment on the district court's belief that it was unable to consider the delay in making the award, and he said, therefore, the result is unfair, … That's all I'm saying, is that if this went back, the whole ballgame would be up in the air. They could bring that in.

Oral argument — People v. Hoskins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2025

This court had said that there's no definition of an odor-proof container within the Cannabis Regulation Act. … I think a fair amount of reliance is placed on that comment, your honor. Okay. And you said common sense, right? Yes, your honor. Okay.

Oral argument — Surjit Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2014

Again, we have another tolling period here. He's in custody. … Singh failed to act with due diligence here.