Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Dana Brooks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2013

So this all happened in a very small time period. Judge Layton was very patient with the defendant. I'm not sure he had made an unequivocal request to represent himself. … I don't even want to comment on you're an accident investigator. And then I would ask the court to consider what the conversation was about.

Oral argument — DaVinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2018

Da Vinci's claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act arose from the detention of ten GPS antenna for air-to-surface missiles by law enforcement agents of the United States Air Force. … I made the same comment that there would be no way to correct an error. Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. LOVETT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2005

It is a plain air standard. Okay, so – It is the air. It's got to be plain air. Pardon? If he had said – Well, let's – I'd have trouble finding the vouching, let alone the plain vouching. … That he's acting for the purpose of financial gain. That he's acting. That he himself, the defendant, is going to make money.

Oral argument — United States v. Richard Savage

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2013

I agree that the issue here is clean. There's two D.C. statutes that apply. It's clean unless we mess it up. How do you respond to Mr. … in place and that were passed over a period of years.

Oral argument — United States v. Richard Rund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2025

We presume that they're acting constitutionally. … It was this Corollary Crim Forfeiture 18 U.S.C. 982, and so the court made that comment that that forfeiture act, the section 982, is targeted at drug traffickers and criminals and blah, blah, blah, and

Oral argument — MercerOutdoorAdvertising, LLCv. CityofHermitage,et.al

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2015

So they would be short in period of time for a specific event, as opposed to I think the cases where they were struck down, it was more general. So these are limited, and they're just signs, banners. … Could you comment on the district court's dismissal of the state claims that were dismissed with prejudice? That was wrong, wasn't it? I agree.

Oral argument — United States v. Nasir

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2019

So we have no reason – The comment period is over, right? Well, the commission – I'm not sure. … It may take a long time for the Sentencing Commission to act. There doesn't seem to be any prospect of filling the quorum soon.

Oral argument — United States v. Kwame Askia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2018

We see that you're appointed under the Criminal Justice Act, and we appreciate your taking that. Go ahead. My name is Robert Irving, and I represent the defendant in this case, Kwame Askia. … Okay, there is sufficient evidence that was within the limitations period, but the case was tried using the entire period. Yes. So where does that leave us?

Oral argument — Sun Life Assurance Co Canada v. Group Disability Benefits Plan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2014

The court, when they were analyzing whether fees are appropriate under ERISA in the Hart case, borrowed from the Clean Air Act. Interveners can get fees, right? … And so the plan was really acting like the employer. It was acting with the same interest as the employer.

Oral argument — Dimitrios Biller v. Toyota Motor Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2011

The safety test was not produced for a period of over 20 years. I found that safety test. It would have made a big difference on cases, how cases were evaluated. … Quote, we've got to come clean. We can't stop blaming the same manufacturer on this problem. We'll be lucky if NHTSA doesn't shut us down. That was in reference to sudden acceleration.

Oral argument — Shelly Stevens v. Dawn Holler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023

They cleaned him up. They got him ready for his bail hearing, which he couldn't even go to for another 24 hours. And they got him out the door. … He was only there for a short period of time, but he was being actively treated for that entire time.

Oral argument — United States v. Jewell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2021

We don't know for sure, because the court never gave an explanation period. Even after I told the judge, uh, he's not bound by the guidelines. … I I recognize the fact that the courts are not can say very little, but I would at least ask for some explanation or some analysis as to why a sentence was given, especially after the court had made comments

Oral argument — United States v. Jabree Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019

Clearly there was air. Clearly the air is plain. The question then becomes whether or not it affects the defendant's substantial rights. … Why didn't you act?

Oral argument — Taylor Scott v. Gino Morena Enterprises

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2018

We get a clean. I understand, Your Honor, but other courts should look at this issue. … But either way, in this case, we are well beyond any of those limitations period.

Oral argument — Ramos Ramos v. Ferrao Delgado

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2025

Why not have an airing of all those facts? Well, I think that they were aired, and I don't think that there's any other facts that would provide a justification for the union taking the money. … But they weren't aired in the context of why the payments were not made when viewing whether there was a constitutional violation. They weren't aired in that environment.

Oral argument — People v. Gupta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2024

It's a very short period of time. A juror could potentially... … Having, having cleaned up that procedural mess, um, the arguments presented by the state are fairly straightforward.

Oral argument — Casey v. Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2004

The last comment counsel made in response to Judge Wardlaw's comment, I think it shows how he doesn't understand the state of mind exception. You were right on track. … There's comments about negative comments that Mr. Casey made. This is in the newspaper articles, things that he asked for insurance coverage early on.

Oral argument — Paul Snitko v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023

Open-air pharmaceutical exchange. I'm talking about the extensive illegal conduct that had been going on for a period of years. … So basically the agency was acting knowing that it had these supplemental instructions. It was not telling the officer who was issuing the warrant about what was the motivation, right?

Oral argument — United States v. Robin Roberts

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2023

I'm not making any comment on whether they are believable or not. … Or if he was talking about a totally different sex act on a different day and we were trying to argue that it was the July 9th act. That's how the government makes something misleading.

Oral argument — Chad Mathis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2021

I think that if there was a series of- if claims had been filed and then a short period passed and there was no payment or there was a denial, they could sue for that period. … I would also emphasize that not only the last act occurred in Alabama, but almost all of the other acts occurred in Alabama.