Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.49s
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 7, 2001
This action is being taken in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
66 FR 9209Environmental Protection AgencyRevision to the Washington State Implementation Plan; Tacoma-Pierce County Nonattainment Area
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 23, 2013
The emissions inventory was submitted to meet Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements related to the Tacoma-Pierce County nonattainment area for the 2006 fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) National Ambient … These rule changes were adopted to help implement the recommendations of the Tacoma-Pierce County Clean Air Task Force.
78 FR 4804Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 14, 2012
This final rule assigns Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) classifications and associated state planning and control requirements to selected ozone nonattainment areas. … Air Act.
77 FR 28424Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 6, 2017
Background Information What are the Clean Air Act requirements for a moderate 8-hr ozone nonattainment area? … Background Information What are the Clean Air Act requirements for a moderate 8-hr ozone nonattainment area?
82 FR 46742Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 8, 2007
Air Act (CAA). … Air Act.
72 FR 26057Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Aug 7, 2003
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409) as an independent scientific advisory committee, in part to provide advice, information and recommendations on the scientific and technical aspects of issues related to air … Section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, where appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS
68 FR 47060Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 6, 2013
What is the deadline for submitting nonattainment area SIP elements due under Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) section 182 for the 2008 ozone NAAQS? B. … Air Act CAAAC Clean Air Act Advisory Committee CAIR Clean Air Interstate Rule CERR Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO Carbon Monoxide CSAPR Cross-State Air
78 FR 34178Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Washington
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 5, 2010
Air Act programs. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 24542Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 28, 2007
The comment period closed on September 14, 2007. EPA received one comment from a regulated entity in support of our proposed approval. … The comment period on the AQ285 SIP revision ended on July 3, 2007. LDEQ responded to comments and made technical amendments to the allocation methodologies.
72 FR 55064Environmental Protection AgencyNotice of Deficiency for Clean Air Operating Permits Program; Ohio
Federal Register · Notice · Apr 18, 2002
Ohio's Clean Air Act title V operating permits program. … Air Act (Act) and 40 CFR part 70.
67 FR 19175Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 8, 2004
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments on our proposed action. III. … Air Act.
69 FR 1271Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 11, 2014
Following the EPA's public comment period, responses to any comments received will be addressed. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 73525Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions To the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Pinal County Air Quality Control District
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 1, 2007
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received comments from the following parties. 1. Donald P. … I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 59 FR 41998, 42011 (August 16, 1994).
72 FR 41896Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 13, 2006
EPA publishes regulations under Sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act requiring states to submit control plans to EPA. … Air Act.
71 FR 53972Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 16, 2002
EPA is approving this revision in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
67 FR 76993Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 31, 2001
EPA is approving these revisions to establish RACT requirements in the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Air Act.
66 FR 45938Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Revision; California; Placer County Air Pollution Control District; New Source Review
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 6, 2026
the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”). … During this period, we received one comment that addresses air quality generally but is not germane to the action. III.
91 FR 337Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 5, 1996
)(H) of the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (1976).
61 FR 28541Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 15, 2010
monitoring period. … -2009 monitoring period.
75 FR 69589Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 6, 1998
Air Act (CAA). … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C.
63 FR 16751Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.