Documents

Oral argument — Matthew Couch v. Verizon Communications Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2023

Mueller is actually making a comment about the social media. He gets the information. Well, he's making comment partly through witnesses and partly through direct direct looking at them himself. … It just comes out of thin air. And I think we're entitled to discovery on that.

Oral argument — Faust v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2014

The ADA and the – sorry, correct the name of the other act. The Rehabilitation Act. Thank you, ma'am. … I believe there are some comments by both sides. We're quoting certain provisions, but I don't believe there is a complete attachment of that provision. Okay.

Oral argument — Jesensky v. A-Best Products

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The comments for Section 371 define a neutral place as a place in which both the person who does the act and the person who sustains the bodily harm have an equal right or privilege or absence of a right … Jasensky's father for roughly a four-month period during 1967. Not at shipping port, but at a Babcock & Wilcox steel mill.

Oral argument — Seaplane Adventures, LLC v. County of Marin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 27, 2023

And I mentioned federal because in the context that Seaplane is regulated under the Federal Aviation Act, parts 135 and 91, which we exhaustively briefed, so I don't intend to belabor that aspect at this … And if you could respond to the cross appeal and make a rebuttal argument on your claim against the county in that time period, it would be useful. Thank you, your honor.

Oral argument — So. Cal. Gas Co. v. City of Santa Ana

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2003

It wasn't acting in its capacity as a landowner or owner of the rights. It was not acting in its private capacity. Somewhere beside the point anyway, probably. … This counsel for, oh, I'm sorry, the third one, Air Cal, is the third case that was mentioned. This court's opinion in Air Cal. And counsel said that had an express reservation of rights.

Oral argument — Pro-Team Coil Nail Enterprise Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

If that's not enough to put them on notice that they need to clean up their act and get it on the record correctly, I don't know what is. … I guess the problem is that they thought, perhaps thought that they had cleaned up their act because the third supplemental request didn't need more or request any further information about reconciliation

Oral argument — OH Adjutant Gen.'s Dept. v. FLRA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2023

And the Department of Air Force. Which has collective bargaining rights, you acknowledge. … What it says, what that statute did, and what courts have recognized for decades, is it kept the slate from being wiped clean while the authority in the courts interpreted the Reform Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Odom

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2024

He should not have been treated any differently than a defendant who pleaded guilty to Hobbs Act robbery. … It's not a clean slate if we're beginning with the idea that under a mandatory sentencing scheme, which no longer applies, you received a 25-year sentence.

Oral argument — Donna Sherwood v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2014

How is spending $159 million in excess of your usual budget over a period of four or six years, how is that routine maintenance? Well, that's a good question. … Minimal, it was notice and comment rulemaking, minimal commentary, and the one comment that they definitely addressed was how to do with uranium mining.

Oral argument — Bailey v. Del Papa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2007

That is a clean, as I call it, exhausted, federalized claim. In other words, these are claims that Mr. … Lambros has commented on or anything else in this particular matter. Previously, the panel remanded it for consideration in light of Kelly v. Small.

Oral argument — NAAAOM v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2018

You heard what I commented on before. … Yes, of course, any media company can choose the views that it wants to air, but that's not what this case is about.

Oral argument — United States v. Draine

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2022

And so, again, I'm a bit hamstrung and this may be, you know, it's my burden on a plain air review to show the air and it was obvious and that there was prejudice. So I certainly understand that. … the way they were acting.

Oral argument — United States v. Ruben Pena-Gonzalez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

The air fresheners. Well, and air fresheners. I'm sorry. The law enforcement stations. Correct. I'm sorry. All the symbols and the— Right. The visible— And this trooper testified without objection. … His order just says, you know, the air fresheners, the rosaries, the St. Jude medal, the law enforcement stickers. He doesn't mention her comments.

Oral argument — Invenergy Nelson LLC v. Rock Falls Township High School District No. 301

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2020

There's no allegation that the district committed any act that Invenergy relied on that caused Invenergy to rely on this resolution. … and application of the statute that you couldn't, if he's already decided how the statute is going to work in his mind, it's not going to be a cleaning issue at that point.

Oral argument — Lamb v. Montrose County Sheriff's

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2020

What if the communication is designed in part to air personal grievance, and it's in part to air a grievance of a more public nature? … So I guess in the time that I have remaining, I would just address the Title VII in Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act retaliation claims. Mr.

Oral argument — Arlene Dugmore v. Mary Lattimore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2011

Let's clean up the prose, all right? Yes. But the evidence that he was killed by Mr. Arias, who was a drug dealer, and by the Well, he was killed by Mr. Herzl. He was the co-defendant. … Well, I'll certainly be glad to retract my comments. Thank you, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Cahaba Riverkeeper v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2018

That begins with a determination by EPA whether cause exists to determine that the state is not administering its NPDES program in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Water Act and EPA regulations … The Clean Water Act does not constrain EPA's discretion to begin withdrawal proceedings.

Oral argument — Griffith Foods International I v. National Union Fire Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 25, 2024

It says that we reserve the right to argue that these events occurred outside the policy period. … I mean, it just seems to me you've got 35 years of pollutants being emitted into the air and you've got a two-year policy period back from the early 1980s.

Oral argument — Gross v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2015

When the Commission went past the two issues of disablement and nation extent, it was acting without authority. In layman's language, everything else was decided. … Timeliness, the two year period of approving disablement, is Section 1N. It's not in the section on disablement.

Oral argument — Erwin v. Motorola

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2011

Wiracoon testified by affidavit that the documents relevant to these issues, the exposure documents, material safety data sheets, air quality testing, all of those were with the division and with the plants … But the defendant determined at its Schomburg headquarters to use known reproductively dangerous chemicals in its various clean rooms. And this conduct had been going on for decades.