Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.27s
Opposition Brief — Matthew Clark, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 6, 2025
See Pet. 22-24 (citation omitted). But that is not an argument that the statute is “void for vagueness,” for preservation purposes. See Plea Agreement 1-2. … See Pet. 24 (arguing that the case should be remanded to the court of appeals for a further explanation for rejecting petitioner’s claim).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Patrick Cook, et al., Petitioners v. Melissa Mays, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 13, 2018
Laws § 325.1003 .................................. 10 Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act, Act 399 of 1976 .............................................................6 Removal Clarification Act of 2011, … The EPA granted Michigan primary enforcement authority following the enactment of the Michigan Safe Drinking Water Act, Act 399 of 1976 (Act 399).
Petitioners Brief — Patch v. Solar Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1945
S. 24; Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co., 256 U. S. 619; Columbus Railway & Power Company v. Columbus, 249 U. S. 399. 3. … S. 24; Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co., 256 U. S. 619; Columbus Railway & Power Com- pany v. Columbus, 249 U. S. 399.
326 U.S. 741Amicus Curiae Brief — Walton v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Battiste, 24 F.Cas. 1042 (C.C.D. a ee ee 6 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) ................ 4 Williams v. New York, 337 U.S. 241 (1949)............ 13 Woodson v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 86-87 (1970); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. at 151-154.
497 U.S. 639Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mark Norris, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 2, 2020
Code Ann. § 39-14-402……………………………….………5, 21-22, 24, 25 vii Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-403…………………………..…...……………….4, 5, 22 Tex. … Ct. 399; and Quarles v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 1872 (2019), and the cases they rely upon. Rules of the Supreme Court 10(c).
Opposition Brief — Ross v. Reda
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1975
George, 399 US 224, 229 (1970) Nelson v. Moore, 470 F 2d 1192 (1st Cir 1972) Parker v, Parker, 97 So. 2d 136 (DCt set Fla. 1957) People of the State of New York v. … See Darr v Burford, supra, at 203, 94 L Ed at 766; Davis v Burke, 179 US 399, 401-403, 45 L Ed 249, 250, 251. 21S Ct 210 (1900).
423 U.S. 892Petition for Writ of Certiorari — General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Eason
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Syracuse China Corp., 417 F. 2d 963 (2d Cir. 1969). cert. denied, 399 U. … Brief for the Securities and Exchange Commission at p. 23. 24. Id. at 29.
416 U.S. 960Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n of Broadcasters v. Quincy Cable TV, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Sept. 24, 1985)......... Black Hills Video Corp. v. FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. sb ..) PP Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp, __— U.S. S. … Sept. 24, 1985).
476 U.S. 1169Memorandum — Kenney v. Wabash Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1953
Heth (1806) 3 Cranch, 399, 413, 2 Pe ee een ur re eee 14 U. S. v. Hughes, D.C., N.Y. (1875) 8 Ben. 29, 26 Fed. … E. 2d 713, 311 Mass. 185; Mulligan vr, Hilton (1940) 24 N. E. 2d 676, 679, 133 A. L. R. 376: Duff +. Black Diamond Collieries (1930) 33 S. W. 24 63, 161 Tenn. 486; Carder Realty Corporation 1.
344 U.S. 913Opposition Brief — Louis v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
Gov't Br. 3 n.2, 24-26. … Mitchell, 303 U.S. at 399.
528 U.S. 1115Opposition Brief — Lindsay v. Association of Professional Flight Attendants
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2010
Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 413 (1988). '’ Air Transport Ass'n v. … IBT, 399 F.2d 875, 879 (5th Cir. 1968)); American Bar Ass’n, THE RAILWAY LABOR AcT 323 (Michuel E. Abram, et al., eds., 2d ed. 2005).
561 U.S. 1038Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Tilney v. Chicago
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1943
Holten, 304 Ill. 394, 399................. 23-24 Price v. City of Mattoon, 364 Ill. 512, 515......... 12-13 Root v. City of Saratoga Springs, 218 N. Y. … Holten, 304 Ill. 394, 399. Buell v. Kanawha Lumber Corp., 201 Fed. 762, 769. Blacker v. Kitchen Brothers Hotel Company, 133 Neb. 66, 273 N. W. 838.
320 U.S. 759Respondents Brief — Crane v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1986
at 21-24; United States v. Hasting, 461 U. 8. 499, 508- 509 (1983). … Maroney, 399 U. 8. 42, 52-53 (1970) (admission of evidence obtained in violation of Fourth Amendment) ; Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.
476 U.S. 683Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Colby Todd Dubose, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 16, 2023
Ct. 399, 406-07 (2019). … Ct. 399 (2019), Mr. Dubose's ACCA sentence remained valid. ECF 51. 4 Mr.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Aakash A. Dalal, Petitioner v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 14, 2022
Pennsylvania. 382 U.S. 399 (1966)................................................:........... 28 Grayned v. … The Federalist No. 78, Bantam Classic Ed. at 399 (A.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 31, 2020
Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc., 529 U.S. 1 (2000) .............................................24 Sims v. … ‘Such a system must be fair—and it must work.’ ” 402 U.S. at 399.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortg. Corp., 136 S. Ct. 289 (2015) (No. 14-1055)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Rev. 399 e. ee 26 Mosk, Stanley, State Constitutionalism: Both Liberal and Conservative, 63 Tex. L. … Rev. 399 (2010).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Casteel v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
Green, 399 U.S. at 169 n.18; Fensterer, 474 U.S. at 21. … Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970).
519 U.S. 1118Petition — DAVID L. FUNCHESS v. FLORIDA (No. 81-5329)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
State, 399 So.2d 356 (Fla. 1981), and is set forth in Appendix D. The motion for rehearing and the denial thereof are set forth in Appendix E. … Fla. 357 Cite as, Fla. 399 So.26 357 death are appropriate for Funchess.
Petitioners Brief — FCC v. Midwest Video Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1979
i i aa a ac le 24 B. … FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968) (406 U.S. at 659 n.17); 49 and Black Hills Video Corp. expressly rejected First Amendment challenges to those rules. 399 F.2d at 69.° For First Amendment purposes,
440 U.S. 689
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.