Documents

Oral argument — Rhonda Button v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2020

Dispatchers are like air traffic controllers. They're responsible for the movement of trains in all these various territories. … She had two disciplinary infractions in the two-year look-back period, 2015-2014, that the committee looked at.

Oral argument — 27-35 Jackson Ave LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2024

The government presumably can't simply say, Well, the air conditioning was off for an hour and a half. Place is untenable. … But for a period of time to be determined as sufficient by the government, even if it is two hours that the air conditioning is off?

Oral argument — In Re Google LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2019

, is distinguished from remote storage services under the Act. … In contrast, though, it's absolutely the case that machines can and do conduct business under the America Invents Act, Section 18C of that Act.

Oral argument — Larry Doiron, Incorporated v. Spclt Rntl To

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2017

I think you could make an argument about ship construction contracts, but I think that was the focus of that comment. … That would be a very clean black-letter law, yes. Pardon? That would be a very clean, black-letter, straight-line boundary. I would actually go with that. It would clean up many issues.

Oral argument — Pedro Jimenez-Cedillo v. Jefferson Sessions III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2018

It acted instead as though it was writing on a clean slate. But in truth, the slate was far from clean. … A finding of moral turpitude under the act requires that a perpetrator have committed the reprehensible act with some form of scienter.

Oral argument — Ronald P. Young v. CHS Middle East, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2015

They also require a certification exam and 60 hours of medical certification training over a four year period of time. … These are periodic reports that are sent to the State Department to confirm- I just want to make sure I understand.

Oral argument — BP America v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2022

From a reviewing court's perspective, it seems like these numbers are just kind of pulled out of thin air. It's hard to understand FERC's math. No, the numbers are not coming out of thin air. … Power Act.

Oral argument — Rightsell v. Concentric Healthcare Solutions LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2025

The merits and equitable are equally important, but given the allotted time, I will reserve comment on that unless the Court has specific questions. … I'm talking about after the six weeks period, following the six week period where she went to Clancy's. She went to work at Clancy's. And. Well, why is that not enough?

Oral argument — Avendano v. Balza

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2020

This point, which is the only major point that's commented on by the district court, is completely wrong. … And there was a lot of smoke in the air about potential undue influence.

Oral argument — Atlas Global Technologies LLC v. Lianzhou Technologies Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2026

Here's what's concerning me because I thought we had tried to clean up where this work was going to be done in Echo Factor, and it seems like it's not been cleaned up enough if you're arguing this. … With that context in mind, it's important to see that the pre-complaint inducement period that we're all arguing about here is six months long.

Oral argument — United States v. Green

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Why in the world would the prosecutor then comment on this person's reactions? … I mean, what happened was they took him down to the station, they cleaned up- And debriefed. And debriefed.

Oral argument — Tobias Bermudez Chavez v. Occi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2019

For a seven-and-a-half-year period from October of 1995 when the class, when the court dismissed the case and marked the docket case closed, for a seven-and-a-half-year period until I think May of 2003 … I mean, that pendency puts a different gloss on the judgment rather than a clean termination, doesn't it? I think that's hard to maintain after Norwood v.

Oral argument — United States v. Dzhanikyan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2015

Why isn't that a time period, in your view, that counts as a deferral of the payment? … He made an offhand comment that he had never heard the question before, but he did not ask for a different instruction, or he did not ask for the Court to give a different answer, nor did he object when

Oral argument — Wachowski v. Wachowski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2010

It's going to be during that period of time that they were actually married. What we're looking at is what is the agreement between the parties? … So, I guess that's my comment. Okay, thank you, Counsel. We'll have some brief debacle. Appellee. Good morning, Justices. My name is Annette Fernals.

Oral argument — Pemex Exploracion y Produccion v. Murphy Energy Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

No, I was just thinking the limitation period is a procedural thing. Don't we apply Texas law in deciding the limitations period? … There were many comments by Mr. Manny, but the thrust of many of them are fraudulent concealment.

Oral argument — Durham v. Lockheed Martin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2005

This man was in the Air Force for a long time. … Well, they're Air Force bases, so you know they're federal.

Oral argument — Pro-Team Coil Nail Enterprise Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

If that's not enough to put them on notice that they need to clean up their act and get it on the record correctly, I don't know what is. … I guess the problem is that they thought, perhaps thought that they had cleaned up their act because the third supplemental request didn't need more or request any further information about reconciliation

Oral argument — Adv Physicians v. NFL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2021

If not, I'll just make a few brief points and sit down, including perhaps commenting on a couple of the points that my friend on the other side made. … Hubbard for a series of time after, a period of time after Sue. I think that's all I had to say, unless there's any questions from the court. I'm happy to answer any questions. Thank you, counsel.

Oral argument — Davis v. Hodgkiss

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2021

They would conduct some sort of exchange and stay for only a short period of time before leaving. Now, the officers associated with this with open-air drug sales from the residence. … The Supreme Court has stressed the need to identify a case where an officer acting under similar circumstances was held to have violated the Fourth Amendment, and plaintiffs cannot do that.

Oral argument — Tracey Kuehl v. Pamela Sellner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2017

There's no need to even worry about that aspect of the act. Well, I think it's kind of a strange wording, the act. … Maybe my law clerk's going to write that in and ask him to clean out the desk.