Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.10s
Oral argument — Westmoreland Coal Company v. Herskel Stallard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2017
The real dispute is how much he smoked on a daily basis during that 40-year period. … air he can blow out, Dr.
35 min of audioOral argument — Susan Abeles v. Metropolitan Wash. Airport
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016
But it seems to me, in fairness, the employer doesn't have a completely clean hand in this situation. … Lewin, your introductory comment seems to suggest that this came as a complete surprise to her, and the reason that I'm having difficulty with that is that I am looking at Susan Abeles' 2013 work goals
44 min of audioOral argument — Carrie Braun v. Ultimate Jetcharters Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2016
I couldn't tell from opposing counsel's comments when he started. At 14 minutes till 9, something to do with an air collision in Akron apparently last November. Well, obviously. … The jury heard both sides over a five-day period, and the jury decided who should be believed and what evidence was important. The jury decided to believe Ms.
27 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Robin Roberts
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2023
I'm not making any comment on whether they are believable or not. … Or if he was talking about a totally different sex act on a different day and we were trying to argue that it was the July 9th act. That's how the government makes something misleading.
26 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Yu Sung Park
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2012
But for the entire period of time of the conversations between Mr. Tran and the informant, there is reference by Mr. … But the court acted on the presumption that there had been a representation that the witness would be called and sorted it all out and made a ruling on it.
31 min of audioOral argument — Amalgamated Bank v. Maximus, Incorporated
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019
And I'll make one final comment. There are more internal documents in this case than I have ever seen in any one of these cases. … For those reasons, I, oh, let me make one more comment. And then I see the red light's on and you're being very patient. I'll make one comment and sit down and shut up.
38 min of audioOral argument — People v. Rinehart
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2011
Public Act ninety four one sixty five also created a scheme for supervising for implementing this new extended MSR term. … I think a lot of that's up in the air when you say that they're allowed to make an indeterminate sentence. And it comes back to the fact that we don't have indeterminate sentences in Illinois.
37 min of audioOral argument — Bailey v. Del Papa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2007
That is a clean, as I call it, exhausted, federalized claim. In other words, these are claims that Mr. … Lambros has commented on or anything else in this particular matter. Previously, the panel remanded it for consideration in light of Kelly v. Small.
32 min of audioOral argument — Shilo Inn, Seaside Oceanfront v. James Grant
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010
I'm not aware of the rental records during that period of time. It's our position that the damage occurred at the time of the negligent act. Okay. … the negligent act, that must be during the policy period.
29 min of audioOral argument — Everlita Basug v. Jefferson Sessions, III
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2018
No comment, Your Honor. I know. It's been eight years, and the Supreme Court says delay works. … Besser for any period of time, and certainly not to fulfill his expectation that he would have a younger wife that could take care of him while he was elderly and in poor health.
26 min of audioOral argument — Gregory Armento v. Asheville Buncombe Community
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021
If you look at the economic realities factors, he was clearly an employee during that time period in an employee-employee relationship. … They would be the ones coming in and cooking for the residents and cleaning up after them.
41 min of audioOral argument — Marinescu v. Atty Gen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Without really focusing on any recent improvements and making one factual conclusion, the BIA looks at it and says, well, you know, they have cleaned up their act because they're trying to get into the … His comments, mine doesn't. Mine's non-presidential. Oh, okay. So I'll defer to my colleague on that one. That's fine, Your Honor.
30 min of audioOral argument — Joseph Arpaio v. Barack Obama
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2015
Number two, if you want to take the position, which is incorrect, that this is a regulation, which it's not, you still have to follow the Administrative Procedures Act with notice and comment. … Act had special provisions for review, so I think that's very distinguishable.
60 min of audioOral argument — Heary Brothers Lightning Protection Co. v. Ligtning Protection Institute
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2007
Your options in the light of changing circumstances throughout this whole period? Exactly. … In the record, they talk about the Lanham Act.
41 min of audioOral argument — Heary Bros. Lightnin v. Lightning Pro. Inst.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2007
Your options in the light of changing circumstances throughout this whole period? Exactly. … In the record, they talk about the Lanham Act – the Lanham Act claim against East Coast and the common law unfair trade practices case was based on our claim that the 780 was a safety standard, whereas
41 min of audioOral argument — Exclaim Marketing, LLC v. DIRECTV, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2016
So when you go back to the clean hands argument, you weren't a licensed dealer, you weren't in any contractual relationship with them. What obligations did they have to do anything with you? … The trial court looked at a specific time period. So, the specific time period.
42 min of audioOral argument — Keister v. Dolgencorp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2025
There has to be some demonstration that it became a hazard and that the proprietor or manager of the store was aware of that hazard and failed to act promptly. Yes, Your Honor. … go by and clean up the puddles that the customers were leaving.
42 min of audioOral argument — Fluor Corporation v. Zurich American Insurance Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2022
Only an insurance company would say that all of that lead that was put out in the air, however it got into the air, into the water, into the land, however it infected or hurt different people over the … And as the Gardner and Scalia book says in this case, the same result should have applied even if the periods had been semicolons.
42 min of audioOral argument — Manning v. City of Tulsa
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2025
test that he was high on PCP, all the way through her encounter when she first starts giving him commands, 88 seconds of noncompliance, him going back to his car at gunpoint with his hands raised in the air … The window has been cleaned of blood. We don't know, based on the record, when that photo was taken, but the window does appear to have been substantially lowered from its prior position.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Guillermo Rodriguez-Sanchez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018
But then the objection is, based on our motion in limine, the objection is that commenting on the veracity of a long string, called commenting on the veracity of a witness, to be a comment on profiling … And the dictionary definition of bad faith is an intentional dishonest act. There's nothing in this record that it was an intentional dishonest act.
40 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.