Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.63s
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 16, 2013
E-24 ER13-1125-000 Bangor Hydro Electric Company. E-25 ER12-550-001 Southwest Power Pool, Inc. E-26 EL10-86-002, EL10-86-003 Jeffers South, LLC v. … G-8 IS10-399-003, IS11-146-000 Enbridge Pipelines (Southern Lights) LLC.
78 FR 42518Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionPetitioners Reply Brief — Segura v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1984
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). … FABRICANT Dickstein & Fabricant 24 East 21st Street New York, New York 10010 Counsel for Petitioners
468 U.S. 796Petition for Writ of Certiorari — In Re James A. Wolfe, Petitioner
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 6, 2024
. $ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Civil No. 3:24-cv-21 JAMES A. WOLFE, ' (Judge Mariani) Plaintiff • FILED SCRANTON v. … Procedure 4(c)(3), the Clerk of Court is directed to SERVE a copy of the complaint (Doc. 1), notice of lawsuit and request to waive service of summons (form AO 398), waiver of the service of summons (form AO 399
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 29, 2021
Diamond, 399 F.Supp. 3d at 397-98. … (ECF No. 62 'll'll 24, 26, 55(p).)
Jurisdictional Statement — Florida v. Zafra
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1982
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). … A8=-24 EXCERPT: Argument of Prosecutor. A25-A26 EXCERPT: State's Brief on Appeal.
459 U.S. 986Brief for the United States — Benton v. Maryland
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1969
Goldberg, 401 F. 2d 644, 647 (C.A. 2), certiorari denied, February 24, 1969, No. 1027. Misc.,\ this Term: United States v. … United States, supra, 400 F.2d at 399; United States y.
395 U.S. 784Reply Brief — Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 17, 2018
Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 430 (2006). … Br.48-51. 8 24 the theory that intent alone was enough. C.J.S. App. 112a-114a & n.85; cf. U.S.Br.16-17.
Opposition — United States v. Nobles
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1975
Florida 399 U.S. 78, 82 (1970) Constitution and statutes: United States Constitution,Fifth Amendment United States Constitution, Sixth Amendment iv 14 23 21 14 21, 23 30 32 22, 24 13, 20 … Alabama, 399 U. S. 1, 7 (1970); Glasser v. United States, 315 U. S. 60, 76 (1942).
422 U.S. 225Brief for Respondent — Neil v. Biggers
Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondent · 1972
This evidence was not controverted by the state (A. 24-25). … Bank of the United States, 24 U.S. (11 Wheat.) 59 (1826).
409 U.S. 188Record and brief — Magwood v. Patterson
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2010
Ayzer, 399 So.2d at 339. … Br. 24.
561 U.S. 320Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Calvert
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1972
Howbert, 231 U.S. 399 RE Recess wield g cts oer) AT ea =” Texas Company v. W. A. … Howbert, 231 U.S. 399 (1913) ; Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916).
409 U.S. 967Amicus Curiae Brief — Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Ass’n, supra, 399 A.2d at 627. … Ass'n, supra, 399 A.2d at 454.
500 U.S. 507Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shanks v. Estes Park Bank
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
VI, pp. 399-401) and given to the jury. … VI, p. 399, 11. 9-13), contrary to Colorado and other law that clearly holds that when a creditor acquiesces in a sale that could have been deemed 24 fraudulent, or ratifies such a transaction, or
488 U.S. 927Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Abrahams v. Young & Rubicam Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
See, e.g., Holmes, 503 U.S. at 265-70; American Express, 39 F.3d at 399-400; Hecht v. Commerce Clearing House, Inc., 897 F.2d 21, 24 (2d Cir. 1990); Sperber v. … American Express, F.3d at 399 (quoting Sperber, 849 F.2d at 65); see also Hecht, 897 F.2d at 24.
519 U.S. 816Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Hays
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995
Supp. 399 (W.D. La. 1976), aff'd in part, 563 F.2d 180 (Sth Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 438 US. … June 22, 1994 Tr., Vol. 4, at 24, 25.
515 U.S. 737Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lance Shockley, Petitioner v. Cindy Griffith, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 20, 2018
McLaughlin, 265 S.W.3d 257 (Mo. banc 2008) ............................. 10, 24-25, 28 State v. Shockley, 410 S.W.3d 179 (Mo. banc 2013) ............................. 1, 5, 9-10, 24-25 State v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 72 (1970).
Petition — Arizona Public Service Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
(R.2, L. 12-24.) … Sunset House & Local 399, 415 F.2d at 548.
464 U.S. 1043Records Schedules; Availability and Request for Comments
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 23, 2012
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation (N1-65-11-24, 1 item, 1 temporary item). … Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration (N1-399-10-3, 5 items, 5 temporary items).
77 FR 17101National Archives and Records AdministrationFinal Flood Hazard Determinations
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 26, 2018
Unincorporated Areas of Alameda County Public Works Agency, 399 Elmhurst Street, #113, Hayward, CA 94544. … Town of Remington Town Hall, 24 South Indiana Street, Remington, IN 47977. Town of Wheatfield Town Hall, 170 South Grace Street, Wheatfield, IN 46392.
83 FR 54132Homeland Security DepartmentFederal Emergency Management AgencyRecord and brief — List of Cases, Volume. 340 (1950), Full Opinions
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1950
Munsingwear : 1950 no. 23-24 ~ 42. U.S. v. Sanchez eis - 1950 no. 81 a oe ee ee 9980 nos 10618 47 U.S. v. Sec. Tr. & Sav. Bk. 1950 no. 11 a7-Ju.8.-¥. Sec. Tr. & Sav. … Alexandria 1950 no. 399 5 651 Collins v. Hardyman 2 “. ~1950 no. 217 3 665 Labor Board v.: Rice Milling Co. 1950 no. 312 5 675 Labor Bd. v. Denver Bldg.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.