Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
6,243 results
0.73s
Agency decision · Agency decision
respect to court proceedings arising in connection with examinations by the Commissioner commencing after July 22, 1998, the date of enactment of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act … In fact, very few alterations, only general cleaning and repair-type improvements, were made to the subject property in the -14intervening 17 months before petitioners contributed the subject property
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Specific Acts Not Authorized List the act or acts you do not want your representative(s) to perform on your behalf. Line 6. … You can send your comments from IRS.gov/FormComments. Or you can send your comments to the Internal Revenue Service, Tax Forms and Publications, 1111 Constitution Ave.
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1231(e)(1), 100 Stat. 2085, 2562-2563. … Goldscheider offered expert testimony on the subject of what a reasonable royalty would be and the judge in that case commented that Mr.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1231(e)(1), 100 Stat. 2085, 2562-2563. … Goldscheider offered expert testimony on the subject of what a reasonable royalty would be and the judge in that case commented that Mr.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-514, sec. 1231(e)(1), 100 Stat. 2085, 2562-2563. … Goldscheider offered expert testimony on the subject of what a reasonable royalty would be and the judge in that case commented that Mr.
United States Tax CourtAnalysis of Proposed Consent Order to Aid Public Comment
Agency decision · Agency decision
Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. … The purpose of this analysis is to aid public comment on the Proposed Order.
Federal Trade CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
United States, 552 U.S. 130, 138-139 (2008) (citing stare decisis in holding that six-year period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. sec. 2501 for filing Tucker Act claim is jurisdictional). … Section 7503 provides: "When the last day prescribed under authority of the internal revenue laws for performing any act falls on Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday, the performance of such act shall
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
In the Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. … 1,332,565 2 613,298 1 In 1987, IRA sold stock (identified as Hyatt Air) and received proceeds of $1,115,560.
United States Tax CourtOral Argument Not Yet Scheduled
Agency decision · Agency decision
The Commission initially provided a 45-day comment period, but subsequently extended that period for an additional 30 days to allow the public additional time to comment on the proposed rules, to respond … Extension of Comment Period, Release No. 34-63795, January 28, 2011, published at 76 FR 6111 (February 3, 2011).
Securities and Exchange CommissionABA Subcommittee on Private Investment Entities: No
Agency decision · Agency decision
meet the two-year redemption period criteria in rule 203(b)(3)-1(d). … Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, which permits tacking the seller's holding period on to the purchaser's holding period for restricted securities when the seller and purchaser are not affiliated
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Such a request extends the waiting period for a specified period, usually twenty days, after the requested information and documents are received. … Under Section 7A(g)(1) of the Act, any person or company that fails to comply with the Act's notification and waiting period requirements is liable for a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each day the
Federal Trade CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Proposed Plan could submit their comments, in writing, within 30 days of the Notice. … The Commission received no comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
“Fair Fund”). 1 2 Securities Act Rel. … The Commission received no comments on the Proposed Plan during the comment period.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 23AA(5)(b) (Austl.). … Smith is an Air Force veteran and engineer who, in September 2009, received an offer of employment from the Raytheon Company, a private defense contractor, to work as an engineer at Pine Gap.
United States Tax CourtDISMISSED IN PART FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION:
Agency decision · Agency decision
Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. United States, 811 F.2d 586, 592 (Fed. Cir. 1987). … The analysis contained in the Kenrich Report, performed apparently toward the conclusion of the discovery period in the appeal and not shared with respondent until pre-hearing submissions were filed, contains
Civilian Board of Contract Appeals
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.