Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.12s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 136 S. Ct. 1513 (2016) (No. 15-606)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Brewer, 444 F Supp. 482 (SD Iowa 1978) 24 Smith v. Phillips, 455 U. S. 209 (1982) 13, 14 Stein v. Bowman, 38 U. S. 209 (1839) 26 Stewart ex rel. Stewart v. … United States, 291 U.S. 7(1934) . 26 United States Constitution U.S. Const., Amdt. 6 5,6 U.S. Const., Art. I, §6, cl. 1. et 27 U.S. Const., Art.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973
cision below ‘‘broadcasters would retain wide ranging con- trol’’ (A. 483); they would not be required to accept all ‘ public interest messages that are submitted, or any par- ticular message (A. 482 … A. 482. The lower court was scru- pulous to respect the right of the Commission to choose as long as it demained within the ‘‘range of choices’’ (Gov.
412 U.S. 94Amicus Curiae Brief — Relentless, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Department of Commerce, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 27, 2023
Petitioners, U.S. … Lynch, 834 F.3d 1142 (10th Cir. 2016)............................. 13 In re Complaint of Rovas Against SBC Michigan, 482 Mich. 90, 754 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. 2008) ........ 20 In re Murchison, 349 U.S. 133
Amicus Curiae Brief — Overcash v. Doe
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925) 13, 14 Planned Parenthood v Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976) y Plyer v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 218, n.14 (1982) 8 Prince v. … Vaughn, _ S.C. ___, 423 S.E.2d 543 (Ct. App. 1992): Aiken County DSS v. Wilcox, supra; S.C. DSS v. Forrester, 282 S.C. 512. 320 S.E.2d 39 (Ct. App 1984).
522 U.S. 943Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 26, 2026
Supp. 1357 (E.D.N.Y.), aff’d without opinion, 423 U.S. 802 (1975) . . . . . 9, 14 Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, FSB, 154 F.4th 640 (9th Cir. 2025) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Lusnak v. … (JSB) (three-judge court), aff’d without opinion, 423 U.S. 802 (1975); Federal Nat’l Mortgage Ass’n v. Lefkowitz, 390 F. Supp. 1364 (S.D.N.Y. 1975) (FNMA) (three-judge court).
Amicus Curiae Brief — SkyWest, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Andrea Hirst, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 25, 2019
Heald, 544 U.S. 460, 482 (2005) (requiring “clear congressional intent to depart” from Commerce Clause principles); Maine v. … . at 482 (Webb-Kenyon Act did not express “clear congressional intent to depart from the principle … that discrimination against out-of-state goods is disfavored”) (citations omitted); Wyoming v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — De Buono v. NYSA-ILA Medical and Clinical Services Fund
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 (1987) (a state law requiring a one-time severance payment was not preempted because there was no plan due to a lack of an ongoing scheme or administrative structure). … Morash, 490 U.S. 107 (1988); Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 (1987); Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux, 481 U.S. 41 (1987); Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v.
520 U.S. 806Amicus Curiae Brief — Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Williams, 482 U.S. 386 - ee 9,10 Cicio v. Does, 321 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2003), petition for cert. filed (No. 03-69, July 11, 2003) .......ssscceceeereeeeeerens 18 Egelhoff v. … state-law claim against a national bank because the complaint “expressly charged petitioners with usury,” a claim that could have been filed under federal law), with Caterpillar Inc. v. 10 Williams, 482
542 U.S. 200Amicus Curiae Brief — Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) ...... 20 iv Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. U.S. District Court, 482 U.S. 522 (1987) ieeaeus 25, 26 Sorenson v. … (see Aérospatiale, 482 U.S. at 542) could not possibly justify. And the statute that Congress enacted must not be broadened based on some misguided notions of comity.
537 U.S. 1102Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 3, 2024
Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) ....................................... 17, 20 United States v. White, 782 F.3d 1118 (10th Cir. 2015) ......................... 13 Whitley v. … Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) this Court examined the constitutionality of regulations affecting inmate correspondence and inmate marriages under the First Amendment.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Cigna Healthcare of Texas, Inc., Dba Cigna Corp. v. Calad
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Williams, 482 U.S. 386 (1987).......... 9,10 Cicio v. Does, 321 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 2003), petition for cert. filed (No. 03-69, July 11, 2003)........ oncseusediibncnieitianl 18 Egelhoff v. … state-law claim against a national bank because the complaint “expressly charged petitioners with usury,” a claim that could have been filed under federal law), with Caterpillar Inc. v. 10 Williams, 482
540 U.S. 981Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph A. Kennedy, Petitioner v. Bremerton School District
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 18, 2021
Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) ............ 12 Employment Div., Dep’t of Human Res. v. … Aguillard to strike down a statute requiring equal treatment of evolution and “creation science.” 482 U.S. 578 (1987), but that did not deal with public employee religious exercise.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 9, 2024
Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) ....................................... 17, 19 United States v. White, 782 F.3d 1118 (10th Cir. 2015) ......................... 13 Whitley v. Albers, 475 U.S. 312,106 S. … Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987) this Court examined the constitutionality of regulations affecting inmate correspondence and inmate marriages under the First Amendment.
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Microsoft Corp., 138 S. Ct. 1186 (2018) (No. 17-2)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
U.S. Dist. Court for S. Dist. of Iowa, 482 U.S. 522, 543 n.27 (1987). … Societe Nationale, 482 U.S. at 544 n.29.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Stenberg v. Carhart
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925) .. 2 Planned Parenthood v. Danforth, 482 U.S. 52 (1976) vocecvecvesccesaces ébuees Sn 6 Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. … Danforth, 482 U.S. 52, 60 (1976) (Roe v. Wade established a constitutional right to “terminate pregnancy.”); Planned Parenthood v.
530 U.S. 914Amicus Curiae Brief — Joseph Brent Mattingly, Petitioner v. R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 25, 2024
Gottshall, 512 U.S. 532, 542-543.” … Co., 356 U.S. 326, 330 (1958). B.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Situ Kamu Wilkinson, Petitioner v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 5, 2023
INS, 4 F.3d 482, 488 (7th Cir. 1993) and Mejia-Carrillo v. … Kucana, 558 U.S. at 237.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. RE-1, 137 S. Ct. 988 (2017) (No. 15-827)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Rodriguez, 411 U.S. … Judiciary 423, 448 (2012).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Caporale, 806 F.2d 1487 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 917 (1987), GOS TB. TORE UOT, bacrsissvsccssccsriataccneatnace, 6 United States v. … Caporale, 806 F.2d 1487, 1504 (11th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 917 (1987), 483 U.S. 1021 (1987). These are the circuits that most directly conflict with the decision of the court below.
545 U.S. 1150Amicus Curiae Brief — Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC, Petitioner v. Hawaii Land Use Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 21, 2020
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987) ..............................................18 Galloway v. United States, 319 U.S. 372 (1943) ..............................................11 Himsel v. … County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304, 315 (1987), and Jacobs v. United States, 290 U.S. 13, 16 (1933) (citations omitted).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.