Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.19s
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 16, 2004
The public comment period closed on May 24, 2004. No adverse comments were received in response to the proposed rule. Additionally, Kentucky has adequately addressed EPA's requested clarifications. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 55749Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Nevada
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 20, 1999
The Plan was submitted by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) for the State of Nevada to satisfy requirements of section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (the Act). … All public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
64 FR 50764Environmental Protection AgencyInterim Approval of Section 112(l) Delegated Authority; Washington
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 26, 1996
Background and Purpose Section 112(l) of the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) enables the EPA to approve state air toxic programs or rules to operate in place of the Federal air toxic program or rules. … As of the close of the 30 day public comment period (March 17, 1996), EPA had received comments from two parties, both of which were supportive of the proposed delegation.
61 FR 43675Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 15, 2008
These actions result in emissions reductions in the DFW 8-hour ozone nonattainment area and are taken in accordance with section 110 and part D of the Clean Air Act (the Act) and EPA's regulations. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
73 FR 47835Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Indiana; Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 17, 2018
EPA is approving the State's submission because it meets the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA's regulations for approval of a CSAPR full SIP revision replacing the requirements of … EPA is also approving the removal from Indiana's SIP of the State's CAIR rules codified at 326 IAC 24-1 (Clean Air Interstate Rule Nitrogen Oxides Annual Trading Program) and 326 IAC 24-2 (Clean Air Interstate
83 FR 64472Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 22, 1998
The comment period concluded on June 17, 1998. Comments were received on the proposal during the comment period. … The provisions of subpart 2 of title I of the Clean Air Act (Act) would also apply to currently designated nonattainment areas until such time as each area has air quality meeting the 1-hour standard.
63 FR 39432Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 7, 1998
The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 9, 1998.
63 FR 674Environmental Protection AgencyMontana Second 10-Year Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for Missoula
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 14, 2017
On September 19, 2016, the Governor of Montana submitted to the EPA a Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A(b) second 10-year maintenance plan for the Missoula, Montana area for the carbon monoxide (CO) National … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 13, 2017.
82 FR 43180Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 13, 2001
Air Act). … These programs include those promulgated under the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
66 FR 14760Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 10, 2017
EPA is approving the SIP submittal of Allegheny County's regulations for open burning in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
82 FR 37316Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 11, 2012
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and the “Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule,” hereafter referred to as the “PM 2.5 Implementation Rule,” published … The Commenter makes a similar contention regarding the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR).
77 FR 21663Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 15, 1999
The intended effect of finalizing this action is to regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act) … Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in 63 FR 42308. EPA received no comment letters on the proposed rule. IV.
64 FR 2573Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 28, 2022
During this period, the EPA received one comment. … As the EPA explained in the proposed rule, the EPA interprets these requirements to be contingency measures for purposes of Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A.
87 FR 4508Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 11, 2023
As a result of this CDD, certain Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements that apply to the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District (ICAPCD or “District”) are suspended for so long as the area continues … Public Comment The public comment period on the proposed rulemaking opened on September 20, 2022, the date of its publication in the Federal Register , and closed on November 21, 2022.
88 FR 1515Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 29, 1999
period. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
64 FR 14832Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 26, 2007
In the proposal, we provided opportunity for public comment on the proposed action. The public comment period for this proposed rulemaking ended March 19, 2007. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 20728Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 14, 2009
We are taking this action under section 110 and part D of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act, or CAA). DATES: This rule will be effective on February 13, 2009. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
74 FR 1927Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for Massachusetts
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 17, 2008
), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (the Act). … Background Section 328(a) of the Clean Air Act (the Act) requires that EPA establish requirements to control air pollution from OCS sources located within 25 miles of states' seaward boundaries that are
73 FR 53718Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 22, 2001
EPA is approving this action pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
66 FR 28059Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 15, 2008
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations
73 FR 20177Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.