Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.61s
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2018
I've heard the comments and the questions. I do not wish to go back through and reiterate the contents of the briefs. I know the Court's very familiar with it. Two quick comments. … But there was the opportunity that presented itself to demonstrate an inability to pay or at least an ability to pay over a longer period of time.
29 min of audioOral argument — People v. Ezebuiroh
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2022
Your Honors, I'd first like to respond to opposing counsel's comment about People v. Tate, if I may. People v. Tate is incredibly relevant to this case. … And that's why the Speedy Trial Act had to be suspended.
22 min of audioOral argument — In the Matter of the Complaint
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2017
as a Jones Act seaman. … They would tip up in the air, and Wayne Volk would be on the barge, and was on the barge, pumping water from the hull.
23 min of audioOral argument — Corcoran v. OPM
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2026
And the ending comment of my colleague shows kind of a predisposition against it. But it exists. It's allowed in DC. And there's a particularly lenient standard. … A lot of the comments that were made by my colleague struck me as taking into account if you had a 10-year relationship. This was an 18-month relationship.
27 min of audioOral argument — Peterson v. Residential Alternatives of Illinois
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2010
To encourage residents to obtain competent counsel, the act imposes fee shift. … You know, Your Honor, I'm not going to sit here and try to argue that that comment is not accurate in terms of our life.
32 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2019
I mean, you know, she's not just acting for the benefit of, you know, one party, Robin, but she is tasked with acting in what's in the best interest of all the beneficiaries, right? … The, this is not just a squabble similar to the one that might come up later as far as Suzette Luce's refusal to issue funds until her sister helped her clean the garage.
39 min of audioOral argument — Fannie Wright v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2025
I mean, if, if, if it's just a comment about the law that doesn't have an effect on the outcome of the case, I don't see how the tax court could pass on it. … The declaration in the air is the way I think of it now. Now the same and frankly, in fairness, I think you could ask the same question about PCA OB.
27 min of audioOral argument — Womackvs Smith
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
Refused to, staffers offered to take him out of restraints so that he could clean his cell. Appellant actually refused to take him out of restraints. … Isn't there a dispute of fact as to whether it was available within the 20-day period?
38 min of audioOral argument — Jane Sullivan v. University of Washington
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2023
The ones that we still don't know are the people who have been added since that period of time. That's the disclosure. Correct. … It is not under In re Crawford, but rather to prevent people with whom they disagree from speaking to them outside of the context of an IACUCS meeting public comment period.
36 min of audioOral argument — State of New York v. United States Department of Education
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 17, 2025
So, for example, in the extension applications, states explained that there were supply chain delays, labor shortages for projects like air ventilation or air conditioning, things that were in very high … requests within the liquidation period or whether the liquidation period has been shut off.
30 min of audioOral argument — Stoll v. JBS USA Food Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2024
That's when Petrosky makes the comment about, oh, you know, we fired the, I fired the guy at Tolleson. … Here with the Bodie and Crawford comments, there's no indication that those were communicated to any decision maker that any decision- What about the firing of all the Canadians over a six-year period?
43 min of audioOral argument — Schad v. Schriro
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2009
So are we supposed to be influenced by this requirement that just exists in the air, in the desert? No, Your Honor. … Bentheim, and it is the most cursory discussion of a very serious subject of the relationship between a miserable childhood and a criminal act, violent criminal act, that one can imagine he talked to him
68 min of audioOral argument — Century Exploration v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 31, 1969
One, as I understand it, is changing the 30-day period to 120 days. That's correct. … They're telling us now 218,000 on your new calculation and certify to us that you can clean that up. Well, we couldn't do that. Now, they contracted with us to go do that under these OPA rules.
42 min of audioOral argument — Ceska Zbrojovka Defense SE ("CZ") v. Vista Outdoor
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2023
At the time of filing the amendment complaint, CZ was within the statute of limitations period. … That way everything stays packaged up clean. It's more judicially efficient. It's not clean apparently right now. I agree, as we see the case law.
36 min of audioOral argument — People v. Huizar
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2014
Your Honors, I think Justice O'Brien's comment about the time frame here is crucial and is spot on. This incident did not take a long period of time. It happened within a very short period of time. … Counsel says, well, you can do a lot in 10, 12 seconds, but it's a very short period of time.
35 min of audioOral argument — The Geo Group, Inc. v. Gavin Newsom
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 21, 2022
In this case, you've got a contract that at the very least goes through, I think, December 19, 2024 before it's effective in any way, and it possibly goes through the same period in 2034. … I'd like to just emphasize, we're not writing here on a clean slate. This goes back a really long way. And the Supreme Court has said, if you go back to Johnson v.
71 min of audioOral argument — Larry Johnson v. Schulte Hosp. Group, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2023
And she was actually back in her office during some of that time period, right? Yes. So nothing else was happening between the two of them. Right. You know, she left. … This is a period where there's no vaccines. Borders are closing. We're wiping down our groceries with Lysol. Like no one knows what's going on. This hotel went.
32 min of audioOral argument — Ysaul Flores Peralta v. Merrick Garland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2021
The IJ then never commented further. … The BIA can review factual findings, but it has to do so under clear air.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Javion Scott
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2019
It wasn't just some balancing test out of the air. That's absolutely right, Your Honor. And in fact, with the conditions, the statute that Mr. … They're trying to clean up the streets. They're trying to scare everybody or something? Why are they doing 52 raids in one day in Cumberland County, North Carolina?
36 min of audioOral argument — McClain v. Avis Rent A Car System Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2016
In 2011, December 2011, Avis terminated the operator agreement as a final act of discrimination and retaliation against the McClains. … Comments made by the district manager. The pattern between the dates of the two letters. Between the dates of the two letters, there were comments that were made by the district manager.
31 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.