Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 30, 2013
public “(presumably experts)” to comment on a safety issue with a Boeing design, yet these airplanes have not been grounded until the notice and comment period ends. … The commenter also added that participation in the notice and comment period is in line with the FAA's mission.
78 FR 79289Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationFederal Register · Rule · Aug 19, 2005
or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise. … The NPR also opened a 30-day public comment period on this proposed Agency action. We did not receive any comments.
70 FR 48650Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 9, 1999
We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 48961Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 24, 1998
Background Section 108(e) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (the Act), provides air quality planning guidance for the development and implementation of transportation and other measures necessary … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule.
63 FR 34300Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Small Business Assistance Program; Ohio
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 15, 1995
The implementation plan was submitted by the State to satisfy the Federal mandate, found in section 507 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), to ensure that small businesses have access to the technical assistance … The Ohio program, submitted as a requested revision to the Ohio State Implementation Plan on May 17, 1994, and May 4, 1995, satisfies the requirements of section 507 of the Clean Air Act.
60 FR 42042Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; OR; Oakridge PM10 Redesignation to Attainment and Maintenance Plan
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 22, 2022
The public comment period closed on June 8, 2022. We received no public comments, therefore, we are finalizing the action as proposed. II. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
87 FR 51265Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 29, 1997
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2) and 7410(k)(3). C.
62 FR 40458Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 3, 2013
The public comment period for this proposed rule ended on September 4, 2013. The EPA did not receive any comments on the proposal. II. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 2, 2013.
78 FR 61188Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan Maricopa County Environmental Services Department
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 10, 2005
Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), we are approving an emission statement rule and a negative declaration for a volatile organic compound (VOC) source category. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 7038Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; California; San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 30, 2026
State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning two rules submitted to address section 185 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the “Act”) with respect to the 2008 and 2015 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
91 FR 47962Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Revisions; California; Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 30, 2023
Air Act (CAA or “Act”) requirements. … Petitions for Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit
88 FR 42252Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 8, 2000
We will then address all public comments received in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. We will not institute a second comment period. … Air Act.
65 FR 36351Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 17, 2000
The intended effect of these SIP revisions is to regulate PM emissions in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Air Act.
65 FR 8057Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 30, 2018
from the public during the 30-day public comment period. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
83 FR 24661Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 3, 2017
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (Act). DATES: This final rule is effective March 6, 2017. … We invited comment on all aspects of our proposal and provided a 30-day comment period. The comment period ended on November 30, 2016. III.
82 FR 9138Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan for South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · May 13, 1999
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 25828Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; California; San Diego County; Reasonably Available Control Technology
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 29, 2022
We are approving revisions that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received one non-germane comment.
87 FR 38665Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 6, 2007
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for particulate matter of 10 microns or less (PM-10) by the deadline mandated in the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), December 31, 2006. … EPA is responsible for the implementation of federal Clean Air Act programs in Indian country, including findings of failure to attain.
72 FR 31183Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 20, 1998
This action is being taken in accordance with section 110 of the Clean Air Act (the Act). … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
63 FR 55949Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 23, 2004
EPA is approving this revision to the District of Columbia SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 76855Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.