Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.86s

  • Oral argument — Weiser-Brown Operating Company v. St. Paul Surplus

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2015

    Your Honor, if you look at — there's general agreement in the case law and in authoritative commentators of what comprises a final proof of loss, in particular, identity of the parties making the claim … You've got a lot of procedural problems in this case that may bar sending a clean question to the Texas Supreme Court. Okay, thank you very much. Thank you, Your Honor. We request that the

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Huizar

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2014

    Your Honors, I think Justice O'Brien's comment about the time frame here is crucial and is spot on. This incident did not take a long period of time. It happened within a very short period of time. … Counsel says, well, you can do a lot in 10, 12 seconds, but it's a very short period of time.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — State Bank v. Cheeseman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2009

    We then refiled within the one-year period against the current defendants in this matter, and so we have filed a complaint and a First Amendment complaint only in this case, which we believe is a completely … They're not sophisticated in any of these acts.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jackson v. Board of Election Commissioners of the City of Chicago

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 18, 2012

    It was not until after the filing period had ended, and the filing of the objection period had ended, that Earls and her husband received a letter allegedly from the Department of the County Assessor's … Under the clean hand doctrine, the party asserting the doctrine must prove that the fraud or bad faith by the other party was directed at the first party.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Humane Society of the United v. AGRI

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2022

    There was an extended notice and comment period. They extended the comment period. They thoroughly responded to comments in the final rule that they sent out into the world as a final rule. … And then this confidential period happens.

    83 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re: Halper

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2018

    I've heard the comments and the questions. I do not wish to go back through and reiterate the contents of the briefs. I know the Court's very familiar with it. Two quick comments. … But there was the opportunity that presented itself to demonstrate an inability to pay or at least an ability to pay over a longer period of time.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Ezebuiroh

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2022

    Your Honors, I'd first like to respond to opposing counsel's comment about People v. Tate, if I may. People v. Tate is incredibly relevant to this case. … And that's why the Speedy Trial Act had to be suspended.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — John Kocienski v. NRT Technologies, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2019

    So the fact the judge pulled gross, essentially, out of thin air and used that as the basis to grant it, meant the judge here, unfortunately, ignored over 100 comments. … over 50 times throughout the employment in a six-month period.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Garland Lott, Jr. v. Carolyn W. Colvin

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2014

    My name is Una McGeehan, and I represent the acting commissioner of Social Security, Carolyn Colvin. … If you had, I'll give you one comment. One comment. The, there is a inconsistency between the ALJ's finding at step two and three.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Peterson v. Residential Alternatives of Illinois

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2010

    To encourage residents to obtain competent counsel, the act imposes fee shift. … You know, Your Honor, I'm not going to sit here and try to argue that that comment is not accurate in terms of our life.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jackson v. Gautreaux

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2021

    So, you're zeroing in on when the 17 shots occur within this minute 25 period that begins with Birdwell. Okay. … Just to clear up a thing, Appellant also made a comment about the reversal. Which time did Henning shoot?

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Zack v. Mook

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2019

    I mean, you know, she's not just acting for the benefit of, you know, one party, Robin, but she is tasked with acting in what's in the best interest of all the beneficiaries, right? … The, this is not just a squabble similar to the one that might come up later as far as Suzette Luce's refusal to issue funds until her sister helped her clean the garage.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — BELKIN INTL v. KAPPOS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2012

    During the initial stages, during the initiation period, re-examination was granted, Your Honor, as it relates to the claims that are in re-examination here. … It sounds like a mess and needs being cleaned up. Yes, Your Honor. I agree with that. How much does the AIA change this dispute?

    21 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Coca Cola Refreshments USA v. Local Union 2 2000 United Steel

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 23, 2013

    I won't make air quotes every time I say goof. There certainly was, which is why we are here. Well, some language was put in there that's inconsistent with the way that they say they understood it. … In those narrow cases, the six-month limitation period of the National Labor Relations Act applies. And what are the cases that apply that?

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Fannie Wright v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2025

    I mean, if, if, if it's just a comment about the law that doesn't have an effect on the outcome of the case, I don't see how the tax court could pass on it. … The declaration in the air is the way I think of it now. Now the same and frankly, in fairness, I think you could ask the same question about PCA OB.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — PGP LLC v. TPII LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2018

    I thought they did perform periodically. In their brief, they assert they performed periodically even after they disbanded. Is that not accurate? … I'll point out, you know, I mentioned the Lanham Act about exclusive licensees being users.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Safranek

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2025

    Safranek's bad acts before the jurors, specifically regarding to the race testimony. … The searches occurred over a period of time. The child made statements over a period of time. I want to know how those match up. Yes, Your Honor.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Linda Larson v. Andrew Saul

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2019

    Larson is receiving two retirement pensions for his work during roughly the same period. The first one is his military retired pay. … As a member of the Montana Air National Guard, a component of the United States Air Force, he's a member of a uniformed service. But he wasn't wearing that hat at his 9 to 5 civilian job.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jane Sullivan v. University of Washington

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2023

    The ones that we still don't know are the people who have been added since that period of time. That's the disclosure. Correct. … It is not under In re Crawford, but rather to prevent people with whom they disagree from speaking to them outside of the context of an IACUCS meeting public comment period.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Antonio Lozano v. Ralph M. Diaz

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2014

    In that case, he fired the shots in the air. He didn't fire them at human beings. And then he also fired shots that hit the people, but it was the shots fired in the air. Right. … In Robertson, he fired into the air, not at the victims, into the air. In this case, he fired not at the victims. He fired at the car, according to his statements to police and his trial testimony.

    17 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.