Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.02s
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 15, 2000
In this action EPA is approving the State's request, because it meets all of the Clean Air Act (Act) requirements for redesignation. … Air Act.
65 FR 68901Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Ohio; 2015 Ozone Moderate Reasonably Available Control Technology
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 20, 2026
Public Comments The EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period for this action in the Proposal. The comment period ended on September 29, 2025. … Comment: The commenter opposes approval of Ohio's SIP, stating that “Ohio is a failed state that is unable to clean the air.”
91 FR 2308Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 1, 2022
vehicle programs (CFVP), and the enhanced monitoring of ozone and ozone precursors (EMP) requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … The public comment period for this proposed rule ended on January 6, 2022. EPA received no comments on the proposal. II.
87 FR 11310Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 19, 1999
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included SMAQMD, … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
64 FR 13514Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 1, 2007
Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 30485Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 11, 2013
monitoring period. … Air Act
78 FR 9596Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 15, 1997
section 112 and Title V of the Clean Air Act (Act),'' January 25, 1995, found in the docket for this rulemaking. … All public comments received after this action would then be addressed in a subsequent final rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
62 FR 53542Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 4, 2013
This Action EPA is taking final action to approve Georgia's October 21, 2009, SIP revision to meet RFP plan 1 requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the Atlanta Area. 2 The RFP … in effect and that an additional public comment period would not be instituted if EPA could sufficiently address any comments received on the direct final rulemaking.
78 FR 65877Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 4, 2013
What comments did EPA receive on the proposed rule? EPA's proposed rule provided a 30-day public comment period. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 33230Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Michigan
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 18, 1996
Background Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act (Act), 42 USC 7506(c), provides that no Federal department, agency, or instrumentality shall engage in, support in any way or provide financial assistance … These rules were subject to a 30 day public comment period during which the EPA received one adverse comment. For this reason, the EPA withdrew the direct final rule on March 25, 1996.
61 FR 66607Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 8, 2023
SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is granting requests by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to reclassify the Coachella Valley ozone nonattainment … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, the EPA received two comments from private individuals.
88 FR 14291Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 21, 2017
Air Act. … Conservation to EPA's role under the haze provisions of the Clean Air Act); Oklahoma v.
82 FR 60520Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 24, 1998
Background Section 108(e) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (the Act), provides air quality planning guidance for the development and implementation of transportation and other measures necessary … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule.
63 FR 34300Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 10, 1995
The 1990 amendments of the Clean Air Act require reformulated gasoline in the nine cities with the highest levels of ozone. … Response to Comments A comment period was set for the period of June 14 through June 28, 1995. During that period two comments were received.
60 FR 35488Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 9, 1999
We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 48961Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 29, 1997
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2) and 7410(k)(3). C.
62 FR 40458Environmental Protection AgencyMontana Second 10-Year Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for Missoula
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 14, 2017
On September 19, 2016, the Governor of Montana submitted to the EPA a Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A(b) second 10-year maintenance plan for the Missoula, Montana area for the carbon monoxide (CO) National … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 13, 2017.
82 FR 43180Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 25, 2000
Air Act. … Air Act.
65 FR 24268Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan for South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · May 13, 1999
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
64 FR 25828Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 17, 2021
This revision concerns the District's New Source Review permitting program for new and modified sources of air pollution under section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Clean Air Act (CAA); specifically our approval … Public Comments The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received one non-germane comment. Therefore, we are finalizing our action as proposed. III.
86 FR 64071Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.