Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Assn.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

The alleged period of damages spans from the initial construction in the 1920’s to the present and into the indefinite future. … the light of public scrutiny.’ ” Department of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 358 (1976) (cite omitted).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan, et al., Petitioners v. DaVita Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 26, 2022

Dialysis, put most simply, is a medical procedure during which a person’s blood is filtered and cleaned outside the kidney. … Under the Social Security Act, a Medicare beneficiary is defined as “an individual who is entitled to benefits under part A or enrolled under part B.” 42 U.S.C. § 1395a(b)(6)(a) (emphasis added).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cuellar v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Swanson, & Alexis Haller, Money Laundering: How Prosecutors Clean up Under 18 U.S.C. … Swanson, & Alexis Haller, Money Laundering: How Prosecutors Clean up Under 18 U.S.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jackson v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Act and 1934 Securities Exchange Act to construe 1940 Investment Advisors Act). … Chevron itself, for instance, concerned an EPA rule expressly defining 24 the term “stationary source” as used in the Clean Air Act. See Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Danco Laboratories, LLC, Applicant v. Louisiana, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 7, 2026

Air Force Major General (Ret.) Patricia A. Rose is a retired senior logistics and operational leader who served more than three decades in the U.S. Air Force. … Pacific Command and Air Force Materiel Command.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bryan v. Moore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

So have legal commentators. One of them, Professor Lonny L. … Rev. 1039, (1992), 1042. 6 Lawyers, law professors, and wise and eloquent commentators from the wider range of American discourse have almost continuously commented on the cruelty, if not the unusualness

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Company, Petitioner v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 30, 2018

Bergin, Comment, Does Application of the APA’s “Committed to Agency Discretion” Exception Violate the Nondelegation Doctrine?, 28 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. … But, talking to many of my colleagues, I learn that they certainly would not have voted for it if they had known the implications and the extremes to which the act would be carried.”). 25 the Clean Air

Amicus Curiae Brief — California Restaurant Association, Inc., Petitioner v. Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 2, 2021

California Air Resources Board, 111 Cal.App.4th 1255, 1265 (2003). … Both of these statutes require that health officers act when “necessary.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

Courts and commentators alike have advocated the use of periodic payment pians to secure the efficient, fair, and proper allocation of medical monitoring awards.” … Blumenberg, Medical Monitoring Funds, 43 Hastings LJ. 661, 683 n.112 (1992) (citing numerous commentators) . 3° State legislatures have passed statutes providing awards through periodic payments for

Amicus Curiae Brief — Justice Justice v. Department of Defense (No. 08-125)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

Deptt of Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361(1976) (internal quotations omitted). … The circuit court held that Klamath did not control the outcome in this case, because the attorneys’ interests in soliciting their comments were not identified. Id.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

Linde Air Prods. … Such inquiries would be useless acts under a “complete bar” rule.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Olmstead v. LC

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999

Now, when he and his mother go to a restaurant, he will comment if she is not eating. Recently, his mother noted that Bernie had spontane- ously commented that she had cut her hair. … Finally, this case will decide whether a civil rights statute, similar in in- tent to the Voting Rights Act, the Fair Housing Act, and the Ci\ il Rights Act of 1964, will be enforced equally across

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

STATUTES: Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 702 eg VER EUR aaron argent eee een Leon, le MISCELLANEOUS: Comment, “The Original Jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court,” 11 Stan. … See Comment, “The Original Jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court,” 11 Stan. L.Rev. 665, 674 (1959).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Consumers' Research, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 18, 2025

Senator Ben Ray Lujan, Universal Service Fund (USF) Working Group Request for Comment, https://www.lujan.senate.gov/usf/. … But were the Court to reverse the 5th Circuit, it could short-circuit Congress’s ability to clean up the mess it made when enacting Section 254.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

This case involves the liability of Petitioner Alcan Aluminum Corporation (“Alcan”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675. … If Alcan can show its emulsion did not contribute to the release and clean- up costs, it escapes all liability.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

Acting Att’y Gen’l, 405 U.S. 1000 (1972). 52. Section I(B) supra. … Ky. 1978); Comment, Developments in the Law—Zening, 91 Harv.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sheriff v. Gillie, 136 S. Ct. 614 (2015) (No. 15-338)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

And the value of their assets was decimated during the Great Recession, or depleted to cover long periods of unemployment. … Rebecca Thiess & Ellen Taverna, Cleaning Up Debt Collection: New rules are necessary to end abusive debt collection practices, U.S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992

State tort law was also in a period of change. … Ouellette, 479 U.S. 481, 494-97 (1987) (Court finds partial preemption, despite savings clause, by examining congressional objectives under Clean Water Act).

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Justin Eugene Taylor

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 29, 2021

‘the dispute threatened to spread to other cities’ ‘the air was raw and threatened rain’ ■ (of something undesirable) seem likely to occur. … Id. at 380 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Seven County Infrastructure Coalition, et al., Petitioners v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 5, 2024

See AFRC CEQ Comment 4. … The Board acted reasonably and otherwise lawfully.