Documents

Oral argument — Space Exploration v. The Boeing Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2008

And here, what we're talking about is a threatened boycott of the government acting as a customer. … Collins' clients acted badly.

Oral argument — United States v. Robert Malone

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2019

The second overt act in the indictment is, of course, this controlled buy-sell with Mr. James Western. … Henderson over about a two-month period, varying sometimes on credit, sometimes not.

Oral argument — United States v. Jazzmin Dailey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2019

Well, and, Your Honor, I think that there has to go through a comment period. And I'll just note that every single court that has considered the issue has said that it's not ambiguous. … They went through a comment period, and in 2008, those guidelines became effective. But if there's no ambiguity, the guideline, this part of it, is just wrong, right?

Oral argument — People v. English

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2023

This is a clean, simple, bright-line rule. … that six month period.

Oral argument — People v. Yankaway

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2023

I'm talking about the act. Oh, right. Lesser included under the abstract elements test. I'm talking about the act. What is the act? Okay. If you look at People v. … Certainly, the state's comment is not in any way binding on the trial court. And again, at the sentencing hearing, no one argues the defendant is arguing this under plain air.

Oral argument — 166 Symphony Way, LLC v. U.S. Property Investments Group, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2022

It was this period of time where notice was not provided. Well, there was insurance on and off. … The point is that prior acts are not dependent on future acts, and neither are future acts necessarily dependent on prior acts.

Oral argument — Anglers Conservation Network v. Penny Pritzker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2015

Dams, river access, clean water. Is there any evidence that their population rises or falls over periods of time and that it's cyclical? The evidence is fairly incomplete on this. … The point here is that if brought under a sound management plan, these fishers can be managed in a more sustainable level and the fact is opposing counsel questioned or opposing counsel commented on how

Oral argument — Cox Operating, L.L.C. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines In

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2015

The first, under the applicable statutes, and we're talking about the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as modified by OPA 90. … Period. There isn't a principle. Okay?

Oral argument — Guy Rowland v. Kevin Chappell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

Now, counsel, let me stop you right there because I appreciate your argument and on a clean slate, it makes sense what you're saying, but it's not a clean slate. … But it was certainly the subject of much talk, of hearings for an extensive period of time prior to that effective date. It was, it's filed the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.

Oral argument — FAT Brands Inc. v. PPMT Capital Advisors, Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2022

Didn't some of these comments you're pointing to happen after the point where the deal had already been past the deadline for when it was supposed to close? … I mean, for a period of time, it's my understanding that this ended in 2018, Mr. Ramjeet was the CFO of PPMT Capital.

Oral argument — Charles Yeager v. Airbus Group SE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2022

And here we have Airbus acting as though there was an endorsement deal, but without agreeing to the compensation that General Yeager requested. … There was no minimal time period included in the party's form selection agreement. And in fact, it could have been performed within a year.

Oral argument — Supervalu Holdings Inc v. Richard Morris, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2012

And third, there's no evidence in this record of any act by SuperValue at any time that would constitute rejection under Dupree. … The option right belongs to the lessee Supervalue here for the stated period of just 10 years.

Oral argument — Purcell v. Kemper Sports Management

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2023

But in fact, I spilled water there on one other occasion and I called Vince and he cleaned it up. … I only have two comments. You spoke very well considering you had a root canal. Thank you.

Oral argument — Redding Rancheria v. Kenneth Salazar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2014

Can you enlighten me from your perspective what happened during the comment period of the proposed rule? Were any comments submitted? … That comment period was extended twice, and in October of 2006, they provided another set of proposed regulations for notice and comment.

Oral argument — Anderson v. Chicago Transit Authority

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2019

For example, there's an employee that does come into the video, who is someone who is a cleaner cleaning, I believe, the CTA. … act of alighting from the bus or train?

Oral argument — San Miguel Pure Foods Co. v. Ramar Int'l Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2015

Ramar never, ever, ever objected to the sale of butter, margarine and cheese for a period of over 10 years until it sent a cease and desist letter in 2011. … The district court first entered an order that said, in connection with injunctive relief, magnolia can't be used for anything, period.

Oral argument — People v. Brown

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013

But even after his testimony, there was quite a period of time between the time he took the gun away from ultimately the victim. Certainly. … It's the defendant's burden to prove a clear and obvious air, and then the two prongs of the plain air rule, the evidence was closely balanced, or the air was so fundamental that the defendant was denied

Oral argument — GROBER v. MAKO PRODUCTS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2011

Those initial comments did not apply to those claims that were confirmed. The point is that- The district court was incorrect? … Grober, during that four-month period, generate approximately 15 hours of billable time on analysis on whether there's an infringement or not. They conclude that there is an infringement. Mr.

Oral argument — John Doe 1 5 v. Gretchen Whitmer

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023

Supreme Court said so in Hutto, and it cleans it up. It makes it clean. We don't have to worry. A state can challenge. Long history in this country of states doing so. … So the period you're asking for is the statute of limitations period up until the statute was repealed or superseded. That is correct. Is that right? Yes.

Oral argument — United States v. John Watson, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2014

Hilke's opinions, as well as the record as a whole, is not clear air. … Period. That's it. Therefore, nothing. And so that is my concern.