Documents

Oral argument — GPX International Tire Corp. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2015

This is notice of a government agency acting illegally. The government agency acting beyond the scope of its authority. … And so unlike, for example, Carlton, where there was a change in the statute, here they were acting to resolve an issue which remained up in the air to the extent that the Supreme Court might have reviewed

Oral argument — United States v. Martin Sigillito

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2014

Also should get a jury trial for these horrendous money judgments that are just pulled out of thin air, as this one was. Well, Your Honor, I differ whether it was pulled out of thin air. … You've argued well on a lot of issues in a short period of time, and we appreciate the assistance. It's a complex case, and we will take it under advisement.

Oral argument — In re of Portz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2015

He admitted on the record there was no other reason for his departure, nor did he believe the gun shop was committing any illegal acts. … He cleans his pool. He has a pool? He has a pool. So Ms.

Oral argument — COMPTEL v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2020

In your opening comments and in your brief, you mentioned the risk to – of the forbearance to the air traffic control system. Yes. … We're talking about their comments. I'm talking about their comments before the commission.

Oral argument — United States v. Pawinee Unpradit

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2021

And this fell comfortably within that time period. Mr. … So what Morris did here by way of venue is he aided and abetted M's trafficking of Lunlea, which in this time period included contact with the District of Minnesota, and aided and abetted it with his acts

Oral argument — John Kocienski v. NRT Technologies, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2019

So the fact the judge pulled gross, essentially, out of thin air and used that as the basis to grant it, meant the judge here, unfortunately, ignored over 100 comments. … over 50 times throughout the employment in a six-month period.

Oral argument — Hidden Hills Management, LLC v. Amtax Holdings 114, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2021

But when the purpose of the expense is to benefit itself and to enrich itself, then it's acting outside of its fiduciary duties to the partnership. … It's acting outside of the good faith discretion of incurring expenses and is incurring these expenses specifically in order to enrich itself.

Oral argument — People v. Woosley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2019

And the concerns from the State was that while incarcerated, he had acted, they had listened to apparently jail phone calls. He was acting erratically emotionally. … I think that shows the air of how this entire procedure happened.

Oral argument — United States v. Isidro Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2013

So we're on a plain air review. We are on plain air review, Your Honor. What difference did it make? Well, of course, it made a difference in terms of the sentence he received. … And in this case, there was an objection to what the government's comments.

Oral argument — Four Seasons Heating and Plumbing, Inc. v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2010

The petitioner testified that he worked during the first period of time and was paid during the first period of time and if he did work during the first period of time, The second period of time, 9-19- … She was not clear in her opinion nor did the commission comment in its decision on which day, why that particular day was chosen.

Oral argument — Jackson v. Gautreaux

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2021

So, you're zeroing in on when the 17 shots occur within this minute 25 period that begins with Birdwell. Okay. … Just to clear up a thing, Appellant also made a comment about the reversal. Which time did Henning shoot?

Oral argument — Northern Illinois Special Recreation v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2013

It's the qualitative acts of the employee. … Are you taking the affirmative act of traveling when you pull those clothes out of the closet and put them in the air garment bag? That's the troubling part of expanding the doctrine.

Oral argument — United States v. Forehand

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

But you're not here writing on a clean slate. You are here with Judge Bozzano's fairly extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law, and, yes, credibility determinations. … This court, when it's undertaking clear air review of credibility findings, and that's precisely what we have here. Ms.

Oral argument — Byron v. Brickman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2019

Doesn't deserve the comment, unless you have proof, that he's corrupt. People read this, they're assuming he's corrupt. … It's not a question that I'm in competition with this lady here and the idea of selling clothes or doing dry clean or something like that.

Oral argument — Statewide Insurance Company v. Houston General Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2009

Now, if the insurer wanted to, after requesting the change in the policy period, to terminate the policy period, wanted to then extend the policy period, the policy provides provisions for that. … But that just shows the inapplicability of the air safety in the contract.

Oral argument — Baker v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 14, 2020

Well, twice over clean specifically states that it's a contributing cause. And the death certificate certainly states that COPD was a contributing cause. … But beyond that, and to say that there's a difference between a frivolous manner of activity and was something that wasn't found to be true of the act.

Oral argument — Samuel Dantzler v. Randee Rewerts

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2021

I don't mean to preterm it judge Morris comment I understand the comment, but you don't argue that about the relatives I thought about the relatives to be on are you that part of the problem, Your Honor … I'm up in the air on that argument. What if you lose on that argument? Yeah, I'll move on on that. I think that the strongest argument we have is on prejudice clearly.

Oral argument — Ramirez v. Castro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2003

First of all, my colleagues mentioned, too, and, you know, we all act independently. We do not necessarily share the same views. … And there's a healing period as well. There's a healing period in that. I guess the State's concern must be, well, some people, the crimes individually may not be the most serious.

Oral argument — CNS International Ministries v. Jessica Bax

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2026

And then your people acted on the list they provided. And so the problem here... And declared ineligible a cafeteria worker at the school. … Bells can comment on this, too. Well. I believe the state offered that remedy. Your client may suffer for such a crummy record. Well, I think the record is clear, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Howard Dixon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

I mean, you're not asserting he owned or controlled both cars, or I don't know what the point of inclusion of that Ochoa comment was. … That would have been a very, very clean way of showing that he owned it, and we wouldn't be here talking about that. Would it be okay to address the sentencing? Yes. Please.