Documents

Oral argument — People v. Roche

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2019

First, I'd briefly like to touch on the plein air aspect of this case. The facts show the defendant did not object to the court's comments. … He couldn't drive for a period of time afterward. And as Justice Wright pointed out, there were over a million dollars in medical bills.

Oral argument — Lee v. Buth-Na-Bodhaige, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 23, 2018

I made millions of dollars, and quite frankly, I feel an obligation to try to clean things up. That's what I'm about here. … I should add that the status of FACTA cases in the 11th Circuit is to some degree up in the air. I told you I've done objections to two FACTA cases. This one, and I guess you'd count New York and St.

Oral argument — Drummond Coal Sales Inc., Appellant/Cross v. Kinder Morgan Operating LP "C", Appellee/Cross

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021

Well, Judge Carr, as you mentioned 1972, which is when the Clean Air Act was passed, all these plants have been in operation since that time and before and have been subject to those regulations for decades … Well, the law is clear both in New York and everywhere else, this court included, that feudal acts are not required by the law.

Oral argument — Tesla Motors, Inc. v. Cristina Balan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2024

Bazzieri, that the district court, the Western District of Washington, aired when they closed balance 2019 libel claim. And that libel claim was only against Tesla. It wasn't against Musk. … And so I don't see how you now can pretend, well, it should have been a stay, so we'll act as if it is a stay. It isn't a stay. It's a dismissal. The case is over.

Oral argument — Vanoosting v. Sellars

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2012

The doctor who initially treated her gave her medications, sent her for physical therapy, and she did that for a period of weeks until she asked that doctor for a release because just prior to this wreck … She cleans their house. She prepares their meals. But they buy the food. So it was part of an offer of proof. She couldn't even explain any of that.

Oral argument — United States v. Cannon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2024

It was all up in the air what would happen in the state court. Defense counsel did not proceed by explaining what the state court resolution would be. … And the district court's comments about unmitigable comment, unmitigable offense conduct are so extreme, so unacceptable, so out of the ballpark here that we're asking for reversal.

Oral argument — Makina Ve Kimya Endustrisi A.S. v. A.S.A.P. Logistics LTD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2026

And all this works against the backdrop of the Lanham Act, which has dual goals. To protect trademark owners, but as part of that, to deter similar acts from taking place. All right. … And there was an insistence that that was the only, in other words, that there was no effort to come clean.

Oral argument — Ramirez v. Castro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2003

First of all, my colleagues mentioned, too, and, you know, we all act independently. We do not necessarily share the same views. … And there's a healing period as well. There's a healing period in that. I guess the State's concern must be, well, some people, the crimes individually may not be the most serious.

Oral argument — CNS International Ministries v. Jessica Bax

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2026

And then your people acted on the list they provided. And so the problem here... And declared ineligible a cafeteria worker at the school. … Bells can comment on this, too. Well. I believe the state offered that remedy. Your client may suffer for such a crummy record. Well, I think the record is clear, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Howard Dixon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

I mean, you're not asserting he owned or controlled both cars, or I don't know what the point of inclusion of that Ochoa comment was. … That would have been a very, very clean way of showing that he owned it, and we wouldn't be here talking about that. Would it be okay to address the sentencing? Yes. Please.

Oral argument — NAVARRO-SOQUI v. MUKASEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2008

But the one for which your client was convicted as a 10-year period. That is correct. So that's bigger, so we can't say that that's a difference. … An act is done knowingly if the defendant is aware of the act and does not act or failed the act through ignorance, mistake or accident.

Oral argument — Friends of Oceano Dunes v. John Ainsworth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 24, 2019

60-day limitation period also governs a claim arising under the ESA well I believe that any action in state court challenging an action of the committee issues many lawsuits a court challenging the action … district we have the state air resources board involved and the county of San Luis anything that protects the plover and if the district court were to decide the federal endangered species act they wouldn't

Oral argument — Hill v. Astrue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2011

During the period of time up to the hearing, which was held in 2008, she continued to work part-time. … And I think the last thing I'd like to comment on is counsel's comment that, you know, she'd been working all this time. She has been working all this time.

Oral argument — Chhoeung v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2008

Since we're talking about reeducation here, we're not talking about criminal acts, except for the criminal act of opposing the government. These aren't people holding hand grenades. … However, it also goes on to dispute the questions about translation, because no objections were raised, and it adds this comment on the second page of the board.

Oral argument — ABS Entertainment, Inc. v. CBS Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2017

My understanding is that the sound recording is not the act of recording. It's the fixing on a tangible medium. … I was looking forward to your comment. Thank you, Your Honor. Let me start at a very high level, and this is from the undisputed evidence. It's the testimony from Mr.

Oral argument — Vincent Mona v. David McKay

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2025

Your Honors, I'd also like to touch on the post-sale period quickly, unless there are further questions on the release. … We're wiping the slate clean.

Oral argument — Curtis Morgan v. Dow Chemical Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

But, no, the dirty copies, I don't believe, should trigger the 30-day removal period. … And when it's disturbed, when the insulators use it, it releases asbestos into the air.

Oral argument — Maxmed Healthcare, Inc. v. Thomas Price

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2017

So they then selected a time period, about a year and a half, and in that time period, it was a universe of 130 claims. … And after the 39 claims were found to be paid in air, and the air rate of almost 98%, it then did go to the ALJ, who individually did go through each of the 40 claims again and found a different outcome

Oral argument — Shawn Whatley v. Ware SP Warden

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2018

Clear air review, let me be clear on one point before I get into the two grievances. Clear air review does not say that substantial evidence must support the district court's fact finding. … We don't contest that at the middle step there was an additional comment on the merits of this case.

Oral argument — Richard Watkins v. Trans Union, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 31, 2017

Violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The Fair Credit Reporting Act has two essential elements. … And a comment that was added sometime in the area of 2005.