Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.09s
Opposition — Alma Society, Inc. v. Mellon
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
.¥.8. 24 835 (Surr. Ct., 1975) Jones v. Mayer Co.,392 U.S. 409(1968) Page 17 19 16,17 16 21 20 20 14,16 In The Page SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Palmer v. … Ct. 1975) (good cause not shown); In Re Anonymous, 92 Misc. 2d 224, 399 N.Y.S. 2d 857 (Surr.
444 U.S. 995Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Florida v. Nease
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1985
Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 80 n.5 (1970). … New York, 392 U.S. 40, 20 2 L.Ed. 24 917, 88 S. Ct. 1889 (1968) :2/ 2/ See also United States v.
470 U.S. 1080Reply Brief — Manta Management Management Management Corp. v. City of San Bernardino (No. 08-325)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2008
Kn [Supreme Cage OS | \ << oct 24 2008 No. 08-325 Lorre me cent} Hu the Supreme Court of the Anited States MANTA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, Vv. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, Respondent. … Respectfully submitted, ROGER JON DIAMOND Counsel of Record 2115 Main Street Santa Monica, CA 90405 Phone: 310/399-3259 Attorney for Petitioner
Memorandum — Caterine v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1976
Green, 399 U.S. 149 oo. ceeeeeeeeeee 8 Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 .............0c000. 7 Government of the Virgin Islands v. … Petitioners finally contend (No. 75-5678 Pet. 24-26) that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing them to imprisonment while Henderson and Davis received probation and fines after pleading
424 U.S. 909Opposition Brief — Smith v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986
Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). Conviction by an 11-person jury is no less valid because the jury began with 12 members. … Petitioner Stoneman finally argues (Stoneman Pet. 18-24) that the district court’s refusal to sever his case from that of petitioner Smith denied him a fair trial.
479 U.S. 1017Amicus Curiae Brief — Kucharek v. Hanaway
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Miller, 413 U.S. at 24. The Wisconsin obscenity act is closely tailored to conform to the Miller standards. … Illardo, 48 N.Y.2d 408, 423 N.Y¥.S.2d 470, 399 N.E.2d 59 (1979); State v. Lesieure, 121 R.I. 859, 404 A.2d 457 (1979); State v. J.R. Distributors, Inc., 82 Wash.2d 584, 512 P.2d 1049 (1973).
498 U.S. 1041Reply Brief — Mottola v. Ayeni
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1995
CRO TD oc eh eh eke eee ay 2 New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (1970) ....2 | Ohio Civil Serv. Employees Ass’n v. Seiter, ee Sieg te | ree 7 Ollman v. Evans, 750 F.2d 970 (D.C. … Scully, 15 F.3d 219 (2d Cir. 1993), on petition for rehearing, 15 F.3d 222, 223-24 (1994); Soares v. State of Connecticut, 8 F.3d 917, 922 (2d Cir. 1993).
514 U.S. 1062Amicus Curiae Brief — Miller-El v. Dretke
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 416 (1991); see also Batson, 476 U.S. at 99 & n.24. … Martin, 68 N.W.2d 399, 405 (S.D. 2004) (generally noting the difficulties associated with conducting comparative analysis on a cold record).
545 U.S. 231Reply Brief — Dutra Grp. v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 627 (2018) (No. 18-266)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2018
American Cyanamid Co., 760 ¥ 3d 600, 620-621 (7th precedent”); , Palmer, 9A ¥ 24 TT1, 788 (D.C. … McBride, 8 768 F.3d at 394-399 (Clement, J., concurring); id. at 403 (Haynes, J., concurring); see infra LIL.C. C.
Opposition — Butner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
.: section 64, 11 U.S.C. 106 occccccccccccoccoccee..... 4 Sections 301-399 (Chapter XI) I! … Sections 301-399, 52 Stat. 905, and amended (11 U.S.C. 701-799). Golden owned several parcels of income-producing real estate located in North Carolina.
440 U.S. 48Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Patel v. Mukasey (No. 07-771)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2007
As of today, no decision has been rendered with respect to his I-140 even though it had been filed on July 24, 2007. … Matter of Cerna, 20 I&N Dec. 399 (1991).
Opposition Brief — Michael Vetere v. James E. Allen Jr.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1965
Y. 2d 399; Blocker v. Board of Edu- cation, supra;, Jackson Vv. Pasadena City School Dis- trict, supra. … Y. 24 127; Balaban v.
382 U.S. 825Respondent Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari — In re Teitelbaum
Supreme Court brief · Respondent Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1958
Tinkoff, 399 TIL 282, certiorari denied, 34 : SS The Court stated (pp, 19-20) ; ‘*Secking to annnal these Orders, apprethart ons. le PPOssessts ile ‘right’, to petition, eof san) preter? … IL, 400, G4 Ne pe. 24 OO, a disharmens proceeding, The. court there peinted ont that ~ink.. 103 conumnittows of the Chicago Bar Association Wave acted as Commissioners of the Hingis Supreme Court
358 U.S. 881Reply Brief — Walter Barton, Petitioner v. William Stange, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 19, 2020
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ................................................................10, 11 Madison v. … Barton is clearly not competent under applicable standards (Petition, p. 24-28). Mr.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tamer Mahmoud, et al., Petitioners v. Thomas W. Taylor, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 4, 2024
No. 24-297 In the Supreme Court of the United States MAHMOUD, ET AL., v. Petitioners, THOMAS W. TAYLOR, ET AL., Respondents. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923) (“While this court has not attempted to define with exactness the [due process] liberty . . .
Security Zone; Suisun Bay, Concord, CA
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 29, 2003
L. 99-399), Congress amended section 7 of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA), 33 U.S.C. 1226, to allow the Coast Guard to take actions, including the establishment of security and safety zones, … [FR Doc. 03-31892 Filed 12-24-03; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-15-U
68 FR 74863Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Rosenthal v. State Bar
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
State Bar (1978) 22 C3d 707, 150 Cal.Rptr. 273. 14th Amendment, and under the confrontation Clause of the 6th Amendment. 24 age(s QUESTIONS PRESENTED Oe FI TABLE OF CONTENTS iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES … State Bar (1935) 4 Cal. 2d 399 Rosenthal vs. State Bar (1987) 43 Cal.3d 612 Worth vs. State Bar (1978) 22 Cal.3d 707 ed t 28 U.S.
494 U.S. 1066Reply Brief — Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1998
As discussed in the Petition at 22-24, this Court has repeatedly held that it possesses authority to review the general validity of statutory schemes even when there are prohibitions against review … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) (dissenting opinions of Justices O’Connor and Rehnquist); Solesbee v. Balkcom, 339 U.S. 9, 12-13 (1950) (discussing cases).
523 U.S. 637Reply Brief — Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1999
Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 420 (1994), an Order of President Roosevelt was “clear evidence of the understanding at the time.” … Chippewa Brief at 24: “There is no court order allocating 50 percent of the resources to Bands.”
526 U.S. 172Opposition Brief — United States v. Nachtigal
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) ........ Séeeeeececes e Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas, 489 U.S. 538 (1989) ..... Brown v. Richter v. … New York, 399 U.S. 66, 68, 90 S.Ct. 1886, 1887 (1970)).
507 U.S. 1
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.