Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.16s

  • Oral argument — Edward Avery Sr v. Lyneal Wainwright

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2021

    The act had been completed. He decided, I want you to go and wash off any evidence so I won't get convicted. … There's no ability to appeal that kind of determination, and so it wasn't just a change in the law in the air that he discovered.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Houston Community College Sys. v. Wilson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2021

    Well, I think the confusion is that the resolution doesn't make that clean distinction. It's one — all part of the censure resolution. … Wilson's conduct reprehensible and think he's not acting according to the way that a board member should act and blah, blah, blah. All in favor say aye, and there's aye. Any opposed?

    85 min of audio
  • Oral argument — McCall v. City of Philadelphia

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2015

    So as Judge Fuentes has just commented, and as your adversary has ended her argument, this all comes down to three days. Yes. Out of all of this, does it? Well, yes. … and to clean out the bathrooms and empty the trash.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re the Marriage of Gildersleeve

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2019

    I'm cleaning it under A and B, because he had a greater sum of money at the end. Okay, so for attorney's fees in general? Correct. All right. Correct. … Wasn't that the extent of his comment with respect to? I don't think that's the only comment. I think he also said that his explanation was unintelligible, if I remember correctly.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — SEC v. Brookstreet Securities Corp.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2014

    But one comment I would like to make on the timing is that at, I think it's page 48 of the appellee's brief, they say there is nothing in the record to establish when the violations occurred. … Okay, but then we still have to look at the suspension period.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Koshinski v. Yenchko

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2024

    Period. End of sentence. Doesn't matter why. Doesn't matter whether anybody's gotten notice. … Kaczynski, made various comments to Mr. Kaczynski, including about coming down to go visit Mr. Kaczynski at his home to collapse, and Mr.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Byron Moore

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2015

    Someone goes in, they have to clean it out. It takes several weeks to clean it out. There's no witnesses, no identifiers, no CIs, no one, other than the conclusory statement. It's these guys. … The facts are so bare that it would be unreasonable for an officer to act in good faith in this matter. If there's no further questions from the court, I'll yield the balance.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kimani v. Gonzales

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2007

    That effective date provision says that the Act shall take effect 120 days after the date of the enactment of the Act. That's where we get the February 27 date. … Why wouldn't, even if we're writing a clean slate, why wouldn't the BIA's interpretation be entitled to Chevron deference at this juncture?

    9 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Amponsah v. Village of Bollingbrook

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2019

    The village initially sought to purchase air rights. We're talking about air rights. That's the only end of the issue, just air rights. Yeah, we know that. … Under the Eminent Domain Act, value must be based on paramount value.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — DE CASTILLO v. GONZALES

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2006

    Because the burden is upon the petitioner to show that she has a clean criminal record. Right. … Well, expungements don't do you any good because expungements, as this court has held, doesn't remove the immigration consequences of criminal acts.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Broyles

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2008

    But he did for periods of time have clean urine tests and was obviously not using drugs. … He stayed clean until May of 2007, but the Phoenix Police Department called the probation department because they saw him in a high-traffic drug area.

    23 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gambino v. WW Funding, L.L.C.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2009

    And he was acting as if the refinancing were for his own property when in fact it wasn't. He was acting as if he was refinancing. How did he explain that? … Counsel, the case was well-briefed and well-acted.

    79 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hanover Insurance Company v. Urban Outfitter,IN Cet.al

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

    First, the Frog Switch case, and second, the Air Products case. … involved, or reasons, trademark infringement or dilution, Indian Arts and Crafts Act violations, unfair competition.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Tri-Valley Cares v. Dept of Energy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2006

    The government must come clean. … There was a 45-day comment period here.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sierra Club v. DOT

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2008

    There's a 10-day comment period then. Then, in the case of these Mexican carriers, there's the PASA process. … And in the PASA process, the PASA information is published, there is a comment period identified in the Federal Register for people to comment. How long a period is that?

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. D.R.L

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2003

    There was a comment in one about the victim. … He was ordered, committed to the custody of the Attorney General until the age of 21, so a period of about 7 years.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Plastech Holding Corp v. WM GreenTech Automotive Corp

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2018

    Once this court acts, as we hope, overturns that finding, then everything has to, any finding against us based on that ruling is wrong. … You cannot – Your initial argument was – and I know you cleaned this up in your reply, and I may butcher this – was we'd be prejudiced down below, but if we reverse – let's just assume we reverse – it

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Marriage of Reinecke

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

    And so the program or whatever that he didn't accept, is there I guess some base in the Civil Practice Act for experts to testify about interest? … And we ask Judge Brumman to make proper comments. All right. I'm going to pick on you just a little bit more.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — MedCath Empl. Health Care Plan v. Dustin Stratton

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2017

    The state didn't follow it closely, but they're not following it clean. … Under Arizona law, they have a period of time to open an estate as an interested party with an assigned claim from the estate.

    25 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Trujillo v. US Postal Service

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2008

    It was primarily substance abuse and the need for him to enter a rehabilitation program to become clean and sober. … , I mean the Rehabilitation Act or the ADA.

    15 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.