Documents

Oral argument — In re: RS Air, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 25, 2023

On the other hand, aren't you eviscerating the corporate discharge, which Congress since it, you know, the act became the code in 1978? Well, I don't think so. … The discharge of a debtor does not affect the liability of any other party on that discharge debt, period.

Oral argument — United States v. Richard Berger

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2009

In period three, the S-1 is filed, including the S-X statements that include the inflated financial information based upon the falsity that started in period one. I'm with you. Okay. … And it said, what I want to do is measure overvaluation so as to follow 2F1.1, comment note 7A of the 1995 guidelines.

Oral argument — City of Taylor Police and Fire v. Zebra Technologies Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2021

The Act was not applicable to Stransky. … I want to make a comment about SciENTR and about the Tell Labs decision.

Oral argument — Turner Const. v. Zurich Ins.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2006

There was an overall consent to the settlement by Western Air, excuse me, by Zurich on behalf of Western Air. … Judge Hawkins raised an issue that I would like to at least comment on, and I think it goes to the heart of the case. There's three key points here.

Oral argument — US ex rel. Steven Mateski v. Raytheon Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2018

in order to conceal the noncompliance with the mandatory provisions of the contractual – of the VIIRS contract and also of the – what was called the NGID, which was prepared by the Department of the Air … It may be conjectured that, look, Raytheon decided they were caught, and now they're going to clean up their act, and they're going to conform with the requirements of the NGET.

Oral argument — Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc. v. Atlanta Gas Light Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2018

And along the way, he dismissed it and then later attempted to file after the six-month period had run. … The board used hindsight analysis to pick a reference, just pulled it out of the air.

Oral argument — Estate of Joseph Maglioli v. Alliance HC Holdings LL C

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2021

Most health care providers could be covered as federal officers for this limited period of time, recognizing that the PrEP Act and this argument of ours that we were acting as federal officers is time … Services broad powers, emergency powers for a limited time period and a specific purpose to address the national health emergencies.

Oral argument — United States v. Larry Braswell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2017

To me, it is easily discernible that defendant says at time stamp 1949-13, expletive, man, comma, mother, expletive, wand, period. Prints all over this mother, expletive, period. … You can comment on evidence.

Oral argument — United States v. John Vescuso

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019

He needed to get the lot cleaned up. Mr. Vescuso showed up and said, oh, I'll buy this stuff from you and take it off your hands. It was all Mr. Vescuso's idea. It was all Mr. … I must say I've never seen in my 23 years on the bench agents act the way these agents did.

Oral argument — United States v. Earl Griffin, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2026

They most often act in good faith. … Hagan's comments concerning the August 9, 2019 events involving Desmond Griffin.

Oral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Cooper

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2019

Cooper told her that the summer work travel employees would live above a yoga studio, and that they would do clerical work, cleaning, and computer work. … Cooper that they would be performing sex acts.

Oral argument — People v. Edwards

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2012

What he did inside the apartment was an entirely separate act, totally separate. … I don't think if I shoot a gun through this wall here, I would equate that with shooting the gun up in the air. I feel like they're both reckless.

Oral argument — McVae v. Perez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 5, 2024

to say today, but I wanted to comment on three things. … The first I wanted to comment on is how and why McVeigh has failed to meet their burden. The second, I want to discuss Mendez a little bit more.

Oral argument — Casey v. Department of Defense

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2015

But the Supreme Court has never considered even, or even commented upon in dicta on right to petition claims in the Bivens' context. That is correct, Your Honor. … She lists HHS, DOD, and the Air Force and she says that they violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

Oral argument — Skrutski v. Marut

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Because he did not obey the order to commit what we believe to be an illegal act. Correct. Yes. … Obviously, we disagree with the remand period. But how do you get around Rush? I mean, I don't.

Oral argument — Joshua Stricklin v. Dolgencorp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2014

Post the Americans with Disabilities Act amendments where the ADA is supposed to be construed liberally. … i clean the store i unload trucks he was uh it's obvious and clear that if he admits under oath that stocking uh shelves in store is what he does that's going to involve some bending and stooping to face

Oral argument — DeAngelis v. Hasbro, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2025

She has always acted with integrity. So, the question is now you have to prove you're acting with integrity. And therefore, until you do, you'll be prohibited from these promotions. … Yes, except that there's no allegation that anyone ever made any comment, acted in any way about anything relevant to their religion.

Oral argument — United States v. Peer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2006

That was almost instantaneous with the whole action, a very short period of time. … And maybe you can comment on that issue about the consolidations. No.

Oral argument — Rosi Godinez v. Alta-Dena Certified Dairy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2018

Well, that's a little bit like you keep out someone's felony conviction, and then when you argue the case, you say, oh, they have a perfectly clean record. That's not fair. I agree. … FEHA, the Fair Employment and Housing Act, is different in California. It doesn't list out any of the remedies you can get. So California law is different.

Oral argument — Ad Hoc Shrimp v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2010

This record here below from a clean slate, however, it has stated, I think, numerous times that it usually begins its de novo review with the informed opinion of the CIT. … That still is, in the world of judicial review of agency action, that is not considered an impermissible agency act, typically. No, I agree, Your Honor. Agencies certainly can change their policies.