Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 29, 2025
Craighead, 399 F.3d at 962-63. … (See Pet. 24-26.) V.
Appendices — Rothgery v. Gillespie County
Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 2008
Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 399, 97 S.Ct. 1232, 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977). … See Coleman, 399 U.S. at 10, 90 S.Ct. 1999.
554 U.S. 191Appendix — Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1970
tions under [the National Bank] Act as set forth in 12 Ug, Code §24.” … Agents, Inc., 399 F.2d 1010 (5 Cir. 1968).?
397 U.S. 150Respondents Brief — Lee v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1977
A defendant may safeguard his legitimate interests by going to verdict and saving his objections for post-verdict resolution____--- 24 C. … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267, . i owe 17 2.
432 U.S. 23Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Denis Quinette, Petitioner v. Dilmus Reed, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 18, 2021
Id. at 69a, ¶¶ 24-25. … See, e.g., O.C.G.A. § 33-24-51.
brief for appellee — Califano v. Goldfarb
Supreme Court brief · brief for appellee · 1977
Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, 399 F. Supp. at 130. … Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare supra, 399 F.
430 U.S. 199Petition — Ivey v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
People were seen arriving and departing at various times between 6:00 P.M., July 23, 1976 and 1:00 A.M., July 24, 1976, leaving one woman at the farmhouse at 1:00 A.M., July 24, 1976; 7. … Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 90 S.Ct. 1669 (1970).
435 U.S. 971Opposition Brief — East First First Street, LLC v. Board of Adjustments (No. 08-1078)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008
Exxon Mob ( ‘orp 998 So. 2d 16, 24 (la ZOOS), nor the judement reviewable herein under 08 USC 8 1257(a). … City of Lafayette, 399 So.2d 1179, 1185 (La. App. 3™ Cir.), writ dented, 401 So.2d 1192 (La. 1981), appeal dismissed, 455 U.S. 901 (1982).
Opposition Brief — New Jersey v. Smith
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1972
Beto, 366 F. 2d 1, 23-24 (5th Cir. 1966). The Third Cireuit did not go that far, but in. … The commissioners did not follow up to see if any of these names qualified for jury service (MT I 399, 18-20, 400).
409 U.S. 1076Opposition Brief — Hawkins v. Michigan
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Parklane Hosiery Co. v Shore, 439 US 322; 58 LEd2a 552; 99 SCt 645 (1979) People v Poindexter, 90 Mich App 599; 282 NW2d 411 (1979), lv den 407 Mich 876 (1980) People v Turner, 155 Mich App 222; 399 … People v Turner, 155 Mich App 222, 227; 399 NW2d 477 (1986), lv den 427 Mich 854 (1986); People vy Poindexter, 90 Mich App 599; 282 NW2d 411 (1979), lv den 407 Mich 876 (1980); People v Ward, 107
510 U.S. 867Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2022
Burke, 179 U.S. 399 (1900) ........................... 5 Dep’t of Trans. v. … See United States v. 50 Acres of Land, 469 U.S. 24 (1984).
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 14, 2025
No. 24-6420 (Capital Case) IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STEPHEN C. STANKO, Applicant/Petitioner v. … Opp. at 24; Pet’n at 40–41. I. RESPONDENTS DEFEND THE FOURTH CIRCUIT’S MISCHARACTERIZATION OF MR.
Opposition Brief — United States v. Players International, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999
Respondents are not otherwis: dissatisfied with Petitioners’ statements pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 24. 1(a), (b), (d), (e), (f) or (g). … See, e.g., New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 418 (1970), McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros, 372 U.S. 10, 12 (1963); McElroy v. United States, 361 U.S. 281, 282-83 (1960).
525 U.S. 1094Record and brief — Middlebrook v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1981
Oradell, 425 US 610, 96 SCt 1755, GO LEd2d 243 (1976)+--+++- 24 Haynes v. U..S., 390 US 85, 88 SCt 772, v (Table of Authorities - Cont.) Page 19 LEd2d 923 (1968)........ 9,10,12 Hoffman v. U. … due process, which mandate that no individual be forced to speculate, at peril of indictment, whether his conduct is prohibited; thus, to insure that the legislature speaks with special clarity 24
454 U.S. 1123Petition — Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
After extensive conferences and hearings, the Menominee Termination Act (P.L. 399, 83rd Cong.) became law on June 17, 1954. 24. … Section 24 (old number) 23.
445 U.S. 950Petitioners Brief — United States v. Doe No. 462
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1985
Other possible violations are still under investigation.° 2 Respondent was named in 24 counts. … United States, 425 U.S. 391, 399 (1976); Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 488, 462 (1928).
469 U.S. 1188Opposition Brief — Winkelman v. Parma City City School School District (No. 08-1089)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008
Petitioners’ Representation Of Current Sixth Circuit Law Is Incorrect ............... 24 If. … Boss, M4 PF .30 SS) (6th Cir. 1998) .............: 24 County School Board of Henrico County v. Z.P., 399 F. 3d 298 (4th Cir. 2005)........... passim Doe v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Carlos Maez, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 28, 2020
Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (4th Cir. 2020) .................................passim United States v. Miller, 954 F.3d 551 (2d Cir. 2020) ............................................. 15 United States v. … Medley, 972 F.3d 399 (2020); United States v. Green, 973 F.3d 211 (2020).
Opposition Brief — Christopher L. Whitaker, Petitioner v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Apr 27, 2023
Guida, 549 F.3d 399 (6th Cir.2008)................................................. 10, 12, 13 Paul v. … Kromah, 737 S.E.2d 490 (S.C. 2013) ............................................................. 24 State v.
Motion — Alejandro Evaristo Perez, Petitioner v. The Walt Disney Company
Supreme Court brief · Motion · Jun 6, 2023
Automated Medical Laboratories, 4th Circuit, 770 F.2d 399 (1985) 15, 30 USA v. … AUTOMATED MEDICAL LABORATORIES” 770 F.2d 399 [1985] and “USA V.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.