Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.16s

  • Oral argument — Stop the Casino 101 Coalition v. Kenneth Salazar

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2010

    Is it correct that what the Williamson Act gives the property owner is a conditional lower tax rate? That's my understanding, that it does lower the tax rate, at least for a given period. … When you say out, you mean out for comment? No, it is final. It's gone through the comment process. We're just waiting for a record of decision and final agency action by NIGC.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Anderson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2015

    The comments of Judge Lyons actually kind of hamper your ability to argue the case. Well, they do. And were they appropriate? No. … This is a man, case law says look for a clean break in the proceedings. It is prior to trial. It's not the middle of the trial. And he says, I don't know what I'm doing.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Chapman v. Potter

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2008

    The question I was really asking was, is there a defined period for which he claims that he needs to be compensated? And what period would that be? Oh, gosh. … But for the period that he's claiming, what is that?

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Erik Green

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2017

    I appreciate the concession on plain air. But it also was not an argument about omissions. It was a false statement. … But also, there was no plain air after Shields. I'm prepared to address more questions related to Lindsay.

    28 min of audio
  • Oral argument — West Texas LTC Partners, Inc. v. HHS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2016

    Following the December 20th survey, monetary fines of $6,050 per day were recommended for a three-day period, and then a fine of $350 per day was ultimately recommended for, I believe, a 40-day period. … The CNA's own statement was that she used five to six wipes to clean the resident's skin.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Gersten v. United States

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2026

    Gerson committed those acts, that is something that can be reviewed for substantial evidence. … The physical acts, whatever it might be. Yes, Your Honor. You're saying we can review that for substantial evidence.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 26-1445_In Re Ligado Networks

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2026

    What we negotiated for in the mediated agreement was for their support during the comment period. … We certainly could ask the FCC, but it is not our comment period. It's the FCC's comment period. And I don't even know—we certainly wouldn't have had any reason to do that.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Bojorquez-Rojo

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2005

    There was this period of two months where she had not been paying on the rent, and she was moving out over a slow period of time. … So it's more than just her mere presence the officers were acting upon.

    18 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Reyes

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2023

    105 just has some additional notice requirements and 105 has the 30-day response period in it. … In essence, the principle underlying this standard, as any good faith standard, is that he who seeks equity must come to court with clean hands. Defendant here has failed to show good cause.

    41 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Milton v. Therra

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2018

    So I understand that different judges might have decided differently, and I understand from the public court's perspective he's got to make a clean call on the jurisdictional issue. … So I would make, I would comment on that as follows.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Champion v. Robinson 01-35887,01-35893

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2003

    Air Act, defendants are not entitled to their fees unless the cases are brought that are unreasonable or frivolous. … What would be the fees of Champion, just order of magnitude, for the period before the offer?

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Metro-North Commuter Railroad

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2016

    They sort of stuck it in where, and then said the, the Air 21 burdens of proof should apply, but there's nothing like this in Air 21. … Yes, I'd like to hear your comments on the jurisdiction. Sure.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Terry v. Hooper

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2023

    Well, then what about his comment, just your acknowledgment right there that she came up with it being Jonathan? … There wasn't any evidence that he was treating some kind of condition that he was trying to, you know, clean or some hygienic purpose. It wasn't inadvertent. It wasn't accidental.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — NIPPONKOA v. FEDEX

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2004

    And the trucking transportation was incidental to the air transportation contract of transportation by air. … Finally, international air transportation by air is clearly governed by the Warsaw Convention. We know that. It's all over the way bill.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Masters Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. DEA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2017

    going through the formal notice and comment rulemaking procedure. … But you say, no, they led us to believe we had a clean bill of health. Isn't estoppel the right way to look at that?

    46 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sottos v. Board of Trustees of the Firefighters' Pension Fund of the City of Moline

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2017

    In this case, the credible testimony of the HR Director of the City of Moline testified that that occurred March 8, 2013, at the end of the PETA period, or Public Employee Disability Act period. … The last time that the plaintiff received a paycheck from the city for his full amount is at the end of the Public Employee Disability Act period.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Cathleen Kennedy v. Lilly Extended Disability Plan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2017

    And I want to draw your attention, the court's attention, to a few comments if I could. And this is in our supplemental appendix. … She is able to do her pre-morbid level of routine domestic chores, including cleaning and shopping. She is physically active. She runs three miles about four to five times a week.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. James Collins, Jr.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2013

    Well, if there was criminal activity at the club and the bouncer acted on his own, maybe he would be the leader. … In a 1955 gambling charge, there's case law that says the person that cleans up or serves coffee can be part of that, those five people in the business.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Carsten Rosenow

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2021

    They did that three It's important, I think that seizures or preservation requests are permitted for a 90 day period under 2703. This was done in one 90 day period. … And the district court in that case found as a factual matter that he acted with an expectation of a reward.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Malchert

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

    Your comment on James and I'll ask the question. … It's still up in the air, and that's why we need one. So, Your Honors, if you don't have any further questions, I would ask that you amend the clause for 604-DC compliance. Thank you.

    24 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.