Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.15s
Oral argument — United States v. Alcala-Maravilla
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2003
What happened in Dipentino, which was a Clean Water Act case in which the defendants were – was indicted on a certain offense of a violation of a certain regulation of asbestos removal, and then the trial … Now, both of them, as this Court noted in this case, amounted to the same Clean Water Act violation. They were simply different ways to violate the same statute.
28 min of audioOral argument — Cynthia Pittman v. Unum Group
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021
Judge Schratz, I don't believe that comment from the district judge was important or relevant to its conclusion. … And yet at the end of the class period, when they do have to come clean, they admit that the rate increases were taking longer than expected.
30 min of audioOral argument — In Re AE Liquidation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2016
How could a brief statement of the basis for reducing the notification period satisfy the mandate of the statute and give to employees the information they need to determine whether a notice period was … properly shortened under the Act if there's no reference to the Act itself?
57 min of audioOral argument — United States v. James Collins, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2013
Well, if there was criminal activity at the club and the bouncer acted on his own, maybe he would be the leader. … In a 1955 gambling charge, there's case law that says the person that cleans up or serves coffee can be part of that, those five people in the business.
30 min of audioOral argument — West Texas LTC Partners, Inc. v. HHS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2016
Following the December 20th survey, monetary fines of $6,050 per day were recommended for a three-day period, and then a fine of $350 per day was ultimately recommended for, I believe, a 40-day period. … The CNA's own statement was that she used five to six wipes to clean the resident's skin.
38 min of audioOral argument — Noyes v.Kelley services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2006
It was within the discovery cutoff period. As is Rick Ross. Rick Ross was within the expert discovery period. Rick Ross is the expert. So for trial, there's no issue? No. … It's not just discrimination in the air or pretext in the air. It is that – What's your best authority for what the standard is that the plaintiff needs to meet for pretext?
38 min of audioOral argument — Chapman v. Potter
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2008
The question I was really asking was, is there a defined period for which he claims that he needs to be compensated? And what period would that be? Oh, gosh. … But for the period that he's claiming, what is that?
39 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Best
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2020
and verified under penalty of perjury that this is recollection that he can put into this motion at this time which is that he saw him sleep on several occasions that the some jurors also saw that and commented … allegations are clearly frivolous and you know to take a slightly different care very different case where all the defendant does is say I saw that my my counsel sleeping a substantial amount of time period
36 min of audioOral argument — Dominguez v. Weiser Security Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2026
His disciplinary and performance record was completely clean up to that point in time. … And then acted upon that.
31 min of audioOral argument — GIBSON v. ORTIZ
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2004
But they may not get the exact one that you're seeing here, but what they're getting is a cleaned-up, typed-out version of it. They do get a cleaned-up type. They do get it. … Period. Okay. The question is, does some other instruction that's at issue in this case, does that create an exception? Well, it doesn't say it does.
33 min of audioOral argument — Stop the Casino 101 Coalition v. Kenneth Salazar
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2010
Is it correct that what the Williamson Act gives the property owner is a conditional lower tax rate? That's my understanding, that it does lower the tax rate, at least for a given period. … When you say out, you mean out for comment? No, it is final. It's gone through the comment process. We're just waiting for a record of decision and final agency action by NIGC.
41 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jahner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2003
So neither of these parties have clean hands here, and that's important to realize. But that was presented to the jury on a question of entrapment. … Once again, what was shown was not a moving image of the webcam but a snapshot, and there's about 11, 12, or 13 of those all together over the three-and-a-half-month period that were provided not only
19 min of audioOral argument — United States v. William A. Goodwill
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2021
So the Rodriguez moment here is 2.02 p.m., which is when the records check comes back clean from Leeds and the Secretary of State. … Under the case law, uh, the officers only have to be acting reasonably. Detective Roseman, the district court found, was acting diligently.
18 min of audioOral argument — Rahimi v. Gonzales
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 15, 2007
It seems to me that I'd be interested in your comment on this, that it's de novo review because it is, in effect, a mixed question of law and fact. … And on that particular, that factual question, the board should have been reviewing the immigration judge with clear air.
22 min of audioOral argument — People v. Densen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2013
What is your response to the comment that only statements made in furtherance of the conspiracy are admissible? … At that point, they were on their way back to Banner's house for Giles to go ahead and clean up, to clean off the guns, clean off the fingerprints, et cetera.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Larry Braswell
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2017
To me, it is easily discernible that defendant says at time stamp 1949-13, expletive, man, comma, mother, expletive, wand, period. Prints all over this mother, expletive, period. … You can comment on evidence.
30 min of audioOral argument — Bruner v. Cassidy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2024
McCoy was being aggressive or acting in a dangerous manner toward the officers. … He was certainly acting irrationally.
32 min of audioOral argument — Pacific Ship Repair v. OWCP
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2012
Further, the Act, Section 908E of the Longshore Act, provides that a temporary partially disabled employee is only entitled to compensation for a period of five years. … Again, it's up in the air after Price.
25 min of audioOral argument — DeAngelis v. Hasbro, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2025
She has always acted with integrity. So, the question is now you have to prove you're acting with integrity. And therefore, until you do, you'll be prohibited from these promotions. … Yes, except that there's no allegation that anyone ever made any comment, acted in any way about anything relevant to their religion.
32 min of audioOral argument — +SEB v. Montgomery Ward
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2009
If you don't know about it, you can't be inducing infringement for that period of time. … And one who was acting in an objectively business-like manner should have known that the product is probably patented. Pentelpha had made other products, not this product.
32 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.