Documents

Respondents Brief — Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New York

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1968

Bd. of Ed. of Phila., 357.U.S. 399 (1959) . .6, 11, 12 -. Berger v..New York, 338 U.S. 41 (1967) 6,17, 24, passim _ Brinegar-v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1948) .... 31 _ Caimara v. … Murphy, 24 AD2d 737 (1st Dep’t.,.1965).

Appendix — Mass v. City of Carlsbad

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1995

Tiburon, 24 Cal.App.3d 266, 273 (1979). … City of Ventura, 24 Cal.3d 605, 615 (1979).

Opposition Brief — National Ass'n of Broadcasters v. Quincy Cable TV, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1986

FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. ED 4544 nS NACA HAds NOWRA OS Coie eh OkS OOK CRK SS 10 Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976) ................ 7 Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. … Circuit’s ‘‘cavalier dismissal of the interrelationship of . . . copyright and regulatory issues’’ (Joint Pet., p. 24) somehow misled the court in its First Amendment analysis.

Opposition — Enmund v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1982

State 396 86-24 1113 (Fla. 1981) Lockett v. Ohio, -S. CRGVG) © © 0 «6 Proffitt v. Florida, Stein v. New York, . . 1953) . . . . . OTHER AUTHORITIES 28 U.S.C. … State, 399 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 1981). Rehearing was denied on July 20, 1981.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Mark Hanneman, Minneapolis Police Officer, et al., Petitioners v. Karen Wells, as Co-Trustee for the Next of Kin of Amir Rahkare Locke, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 29, 2025

Craighead, 399 F.3d at 962-63. … (See Pet. 24-26.) V.

Agency Information Collection Activity: Subpart B, Plans and Information; Comment Request

Federal Register · Notice · Sep 24, 2012

DATES: Submit written comments by October 24, 2012. … General departure and alternative compliance requests not specifically covered elsewhere in subpart B regulations 2 5 requests 10 Subtotal 5 responses 10 Total Burden 399

Reply Brief — Anthony Giordano v. United States of America

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1974

REPLY BRIEF Pursuant to Rule 24(4) and 24(5) of this Court, petitioners submit the following reply to the government's brief in opposi- tion: The brief in opposition is a shocking attempt to denigrate … Gerard, 491 F. 2d 1300 (9th Cir. 1972); United States v Ellenbogen, 390 F. 2d 537 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 918, rehearing denied 399 U.S. 917) could the Ninth Cir- cuit conclude that the

Emergency Application — William Frances Silvia, Applicant v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 14, 2026

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986). It is indisputable that Mr. Silvia will be irreparably harmed if his execution is allowed to go forward. The balance of equities weighs heavily in favor of a stay. … (Loran Cole executed 8/29/24; James Ford executed 2/13/25, Glen Rogers executed 5/15/25; Thomas Gudinas executed 6/24/25; Michael King executed 3/17/26; Dominick Occhicone executed 7/28/26; William Silvia

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Denis Quinette, Petitioner v. Dilmus Reed, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 18, 2021

Id. at 69a, ¶¶ 24-25. … See, e.g., O.C.G.A. § 33-24-51.

brief for appellee — Califano v. Goldfarb

Supreme Court brief · brief for appellee · 1977

Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, 399 F. Supp. at 130. … Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare supra, 399 F.

Petition — Ivey v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

People were seen arriving and departing at various times between 6:00 P.M., July 23, 1976 and 1:00 A.M., July 24, 1976, leaving one woman at the farmhouse at 1:00 A.M., July 24, 1976; 7. … Louisiana, 399 U.S. 30, 90 S.Ct. 1669 (1970).

Opposition Brief — East First First Street, LLC v. Board of Adjustments (No. 08-1078)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008

Exxon Mob ( ‘orp 998 So. 2d 16, 24 (la ZOOS), nor the judement reviewable herein under 08 USC 8 1257(a). … City of Lafayette, 399 So.2d 1179, 1185 (La. App. 3™ Cir.), writ dented, 401 So.2d 1192 (La. 1981), appeal dismissed, 455 U.S. 901 (1982).

Opposition Brief — New Jersey v. Smith

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1972

Beto, 366 F. 2d 1, 23-24 (5th Cir. 1966). The Third Cireuit did not go that far, but in. … The commissioners did not follow up to see if any of these names qualified for jury service (MT I 399, 18-20, 400).

Opposition Brief — Hawkins v. Michigan

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993

Parklane Hosiery Co. v Shore, 439 US 322; 58 LEd2a 552; 99 SCt 645 (1979) People v Poindexter, 90 Mich App 599; 282 NW2d 411 (1979), lv den 407 Mich 876 (1980) People v Turner, 155 Mich App 222; 399 … People v Turner, 155 Mich App 222, 227; 399 NW2d 477 (1986), lv den 427 Mich 854 (1986); People vy Poindexter, 90 Mich App 599; 282 NW2d 411 (1979), lv den 407 Mich 876 (1980); People v Ward, 107

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ariyan Incorporated, dba Discount Corner, et al., Petitioners v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 22, 2022

Burke, 179 U.S. 399 (1900) ........................... 5 Dep’t of Trans. v. … See United States v. 50 Acres of Land, 469 U.S. 24 (1984).

Reply Brief — Stephen C. Stanko, Petitioner v. Bryan P. Stirling, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 14, 2025

No. 24-6420 (Capital Case) IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STEPHEN C. STANKO, Applicant/Petitioner v. … Opp. at 24; Pet’n at 40–41. I. RESPONDENTS DEFEND THE FOURTH CIRCUIT’S MISCHARACTERIZATION OF MR.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Rose v. Clark

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52-53 (1970) (admission of evidence obtained in violation of Fourth Amendment) ; Coleman v. … United States, 373 U.S. 1, 24-25 (1963) (Harlan, J., dissenting).

Opposition Brief — United States v. Players International, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1999

Respondents are not otherwis: dissatisfied with Petitioners’ statements pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 24. 1(a), (b), (d), (e), (f) or (g). … See, e.g., New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 418 (1970), McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros, 372 U.S. 10, 12 (1963); McElroy v. United States, 361 U.S. 281, 282-83 (1960).

Record and brief — Middlebrook v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1981

Oradell, 425 US 610, 96 SCt 1755, GO LEd2d 243 (1976)+--+++- 24 Haynes v. U..S., 390 US 85, 88 SCt 772, v (Table of Authorities - Cont.) Page 19 LEd2d 923 (1968)........ 9,10,12 Hoffman v. U. … due process, which mandate that no individual be forced to speculate, at peril of indictment, whether his conduct is prohibited; thus, to insure that the legislature speaks with special clarity 24

Petition — Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

After extensive conferences and hearings, the Menominee Termination Act (P.L. 399, 83rd Cong.) became law on June 17, 1954. 24. … Section 24 (old number) 23.