Documents

Oral argument — Fong LLC v. The Hartford Fire Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2004

And I believe those, although they are Miller Act cases, are analogous to the bond at issue here. … If, in fact, Hartford wanted to comment on the duration of the work rather than the scope, they had the power to do that.

Oral argument — United States v. Claudia Bastidas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2016

I would, I believe these are not means, but two entirely separate acts with mental, different mental states. She goes from X to Y under certain circumstances. She goes from Y to X under others. … As long as at some point in the process the defendant came clean. I disagree with that characterization of the case law.

Oral argument — Sondag v. Tremco Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2015

And I think that's interesting because the comment that was made... The comment that was made as a part of that actual impeachment effort was simply a question to Mr. Kohler. … And the asbestos products liability case that we cited from Pennsylvania actually comments a little bit, I think it's a 2011 case, it comments a little bit about the status of Illinois law.

Oral argument — Plowden v. Parse

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2018

What would be the limitations, period, on those salesmanship misrepresentations that you talked about? … So to be sure, the individuals were involved acting on behalf of the LLCs when they made those payments, but they were acting in their capacity as agents.

Oral argument — Indirect Purchaser v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

It's plausible that these comments, restrictions on supply, discipline, it's possible that these are code words for we have an agreement. … So the two time periods, you had excess supply in the pre-period. You had excess demand in the conspiracy period. They weren't at all comparable. What else do the plaintiffs plead?

Oral argument — City of Burnsville v. Koppers, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2022

Now, given that Beezer is still cleaning up PAH contamination here in St. … Well, we knew it would go into coal-to-air pavement sealant. They've alleged that. We're not suggesting we didn't know that.

Oral argument — Fermin Valenzuela v. City of Anaheim

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

And the other thing I would say, Judge Lee, we have air chokes here. You have to assume air chokes, not carotid restraints. That is equivalent to deadly force. … The other thing on the Bain Act, there's plenty of evidence to support the finding on the Bain Act. As Reese v.

Oral argument — People v. Peters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2017

Isn't any comment on his failure to say to the police, he was holding a gun on me, I was acting in self-defense. Isn't it harmless here or beyond a reasonable doubt? Not at all, not at all. … But in any event, even if these two statements were air, and even if it was air for the state to question Officer Lowey, and even if it was air for us to cross-examine the defendant on what he didn't say

Oral argument — Vullo v. Condor Capital Corpor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2017

I can't even turn around and do the business any further until we kind of get this cleaned up. … And so, it really was all about a clean up, dealing with what was going on, and then liquidating the business in accordance with the consent. As a, yes.

Oral argument — World Nutrition Incorporated v. Advanced Supplementary Technologies Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2025

You're still talking about a Lanham Act case. You're still talking about building of a brand. … And that's based on that comment at the end of Jarrow? That's based primarily on Jarrow, yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Citizens Legal Enforcement and v. Robert Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2013

There was a period of time, I believe at least two instances in the last 25 years. … This was before the inception of NEPA, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, where we would have had innumerable agencies and state reviews and public hearings and testimony and federal register notices

Oral argument — Huynh v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

The Smith case basically says that petitioner's petition, which was filed June 10, 2005, was within the 30-day period of filing post Real ID Act of 2005. … That case, the BIA had made its decision in late 2005, outside of the 30-day period post real ID.

Oral argument — Huynh / Nguyen v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2008

The Smith case basically says that petitioner's petition, which was filed June 10, 2005, was within the 30-day period of filing post Real ID Act of 2005. Right. … At that case, the BIA had made its decision in late 2005, outside of the 30-day period post real ID.

Oral argument — United States v. Limon-Robles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2006

He commented on the evidence in a very sort of clean and obvious way without having heard all the evidence. After he'd heard all the evidence, he changed his mind. … And so he, even in that comment, left the door open to saying, well, this is where we are at this point, but after I hear from the government's evidence, the outcome may be different.

Oral argument — United States v. Bryan Rusnak

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2020

There was a period of time, a fairly lengthy period of time, that the documents appeared on the computer to begin with. … So there would have to be somebody who was accessing all three computers and putting this clean-up app on it and doing it over a four-year period of time. I mean, is that basically accurate?

Oral argument — United States v. Peter Wright

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2011

Air fresheners. Air fresheners. … But the government acted as if it was my responsibility to do it.

Oral argument — Dean Carter v. Kevin Chappell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2019

They would ask permission first, but they would say, Your Honor, may I make a comment? … had acted rationally for so many years.

Oral argument — McGinn v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2019

That same year, she disclosed that one of DHS air charter contractors, CSI, was over-billing the government at over $2.5 million annually. Was that her job? … Then you had four acting directors or acting assistant directors coming in over the course of a year's time. None of those people were familiar with Ms. McGinn. Ms.

Oral argument — Cynthia Pittman v. Unum Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2021

Judge Schratz, I don't believe that comment from the district judge was important or relevant to its conclusion. … And yet at the end of the class period, when they do have to come clean, they admit that the rate increases were taking longer than expected.

Oral argument — in re: UPS "Air-In-Ground" Mktg & SPL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2013

Okay, so two comments in response to that. … As I said at the beginning, any issue that this might be misleading or deceptive, this is not a Consumer Protection Act claim.