Documents

Oral argument — PEDROZA v. BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

With all due respect, Your Honor, I think there's two points that are appropriate in regard to your comments. Number one, in this case, Mr. … We're not writing on a clean slate here. Yes, it's a matter of construction, a very general statutory phrase.

Oral argument — Hosea Matthews v. Andrew Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2020

His daily activities or things that he inserts into periods when he's not asleep. … No, I, I have one, um, I had an impression from the record, and it, it may not be accurate, but you can comment on it, Mr. Sellers can, if you'd like.

Oral argument — Carey Dale Grayson v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2024

Graveson will be conscious as breathing air is pumped into the mask. And Mr. Graveson will be conscious when the warden switches the input into the mask from breathing air to nitrogen. … And if the state has good reason not to go down that road, not to try a new method on the fly like this, then it's not acting cruelly.

Oral argument — Yale v. AXA Equitable Life Ins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2017

No comment. No comment. This is a court of law, not a politics. I'd like to just address a few things that Mr. Miller said. … Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Roy Helper

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2021

Again, the government promised to recommend a sentence of five years at the sentencing period. … And also, I was assuming you were criminal justice act appointed, but apparently not.

Oral argument — State of Texas v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2021

Um, those air those air in a slightly different context. In all those cases, the plaintiffs were the detainees were bringing the challenge, and they were already in immigration proceedings. Right. … Mr Wilson says, Well, there Congress was trying that in Castle Rock Congress, excuse me, the state legislature was acting against the background of nonenforcement.

Oral argument — Deborah Pueschel v. Elaine Chao

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2020

Suppose all that's in the record before us is that her disability was reduced because she ran for political office, period. And that's all we know. … And in any event, it's for Congress to decide, as Congress did in the letter carriers case with respect to the Hatch Act, and in the branch case with respect to the Communications Act.

Oral argument — Laura Halperin v. Andrew Saul

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2021

Metaxas good to have you here sir it's my honor to be appearing before the Fourth Circuit for the first time your honor and may tell us why the district how the district court aired here then on behalf … I think that a Pelley's brief tries to direct this court to the introductory comments of chapter 14 of the listings but in the process they ignored introductory comments to the chapter 1 listings and I

Oral argument — Bobrick Washroom Equipment v. American Specialties, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2014

They were worried about being able to clean and put and resupply the towels, et cetera. … There was – the evidence was that the normal – ASI's normal practice was to recycle the tapes on a 24-month period.

Oral argument — Kelly v. Sines

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 27, 2016

He was groggy and he began throwing his arms up in the air, probably under the impression that his buddy was messing around with him. … There is about a two- or three-second period, if you watch the video, where you just see Deputy Signs struggling, his arms going up and down.

Oral argument — Feminist Majority Foundation v. Richard Hurley

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2018

As I said to Judge- Well, the advice of counsel can show that you acted in good faith. It can, for sure. In the context of qualified- You acted prudently. … I read your brief to be saying if it's in the air, if it's cyberspace and it's anonymous, the school does not have control over it. That means, period, there can be no liability under Title IX.

Oral argument — BP Exploration & Prodn, Inc. v. ID

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2018

In other words, if they were filing a tax return, they could not capitalize and amortize this cost or show depreciation on it over a period of time. … It's not feasible for the district court to act as the arbiter of every case. It only should be conducted in rare and exceptional circumstances.

Oral argument — Pedroza v. BRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

With all due respect, Your Honor, I think there are two points that are appropriate in regard to your comments. Okay. Number one, in this case, Mr. … We're not writing on a clean slate here. Yes, it's a matter of construction, but a very general statutory phrase.

Oral argument — Giordano v. Saks Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2024

Air versus Sabre, where plaintiffs were challenging overcharges from payments set forth in a contract entered into between the parties before the limitations period. … And as to that, they need an overt act within the limitations period. My friend proposes two, the payment of wages. That doesn't work here because there is no wage suppression claim.

Oral argument — Smith v. Ball

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2008

Fish and Wildlife Service as violations of the Endangered Species Act that resulted in extirpation of bull trout. … Finding a cherry picker that'll get up 50, 60 feet in the air in the Bitterroot Forest is one thing.

Oral argument — Adams v. Castro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2007

Your Honors, on the lying in wait issue, I have a few comments. First of all, I don't think it's clear that that was, in fact, the theory of first degree murder that the jury used to convict. … Chips' testimony is the only thing that establishes any period of watching and waiting for any opportunity time to act.

Oral argument — United States v. Gary Boyle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2021

Boyle committed anew, and as you acknowledge, heinous act with the victim, but that he had done so before. He had done so on dates before February 4th, indeed for a period of years. … But in terms of a completely different time period, even February 4 to February 21st of the same year would be an unusually short, completely different time period.

Oral argument — Eric Hovde v. ISLA Development LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2022

In that case, it was the Interest Act. They then go on to hold that it wasn't a violation of the Interest Act anyway. I think they found that it wasn't properly preserved, so they didn't address it. … There are several comments they make in the paragraphs they mentioned.

Oral argument — Gil Ramirez Group, L.L.C. v. Houston Indep

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2018

I want to mention that there were some comments made by my client in the tape that were not great. … period.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Bourquin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2019

It's precisely by definition under the United States Code, a domestic terrorist act, if it were to be true. … Because on 2A6.1 before, it's a substantial expenditure of funds to clean up, decontaminate, or otherwise respond to the offense.