Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.28s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 30, 1996
EPA is proposing to approve these SIP revisions because they are consistent with the applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended (Act), and EPA guidance. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so now.
61 FR 51074Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 24, 1996
Introduction As required under title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (sections 501-507 of the Clean Air Act (``the Act'')), EPA has promulgated rules which define the minimum elements of an … Air Act. 2.
61 FR 26145Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 28, 2019
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period. … Whenever a new or revised National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) is promulgated, the Clean Air Act requires each State to submit a plan for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the
84 FR 24420Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 14, 1999
Comment Period AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). … ACTION: Proposed rule; Reopening of public comment period. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The EPA is reopening the public comment period on the Notice
64 FR 2460Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 8, 2013
Conservation Act of 2010; Extension of Comment Period AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. … Act of 2010.
78 FR 40687Commerce DepartmentNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 22, 2023
: Extension of Comment Period AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). … ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of public comment period. SUMMARY: On November 16, 2023, the U.S.
88 FR 88553Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 14, 2003
Before acting on this proposal, we will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for comments. … AAAE and ACI-NA assert that 45 days is not enough time for other interested parties to review and comment on the air carrier economic data, especially since two holidays fell within the comment period.
68 FR 1807Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 22, 1997
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [CA 157-0022b; FRL-5677-1] Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of Emission Reduction Credit Banking Provisions; Implementation Plan for California … EPA will not institute a second public comment period on this [[Page 3253]] document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
62 FR 3252Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 28, 2025
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 29, 2025. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve CAA Section 112(l) and Title V submissions that comply with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
90 FR 41938Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 5, 1995
[[Page 46072]] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 70 [KY-95-01-FRL-5290-4] Clean Air Act Proposed Interim Approval of Operating Permits Program; Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental … Introduction As required under title V of the Clean Air Act Amendments (sections 501-507 of the Clean Air Act (``the Act'')), EPA has promulgated rules which define the minimum elements of an approvable
60 FR 46071Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 22, 2000
SUMMARY: In this action EPA proposes to find that the Reno (Washoe County) Planning Area (RPA) has not attained the PM-10 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) by the Clean Air Act (CAA) mandated … EPA has provided specific guidance on developing serious area PM-10 SIP revisions in an addendum to the General Preamble to Title I of the Clean Air Act.
65 FR 70326Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 15, 2015
Extension of Comment Period AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comment Period After considering a request received to extend the public comment period, the EPA has decided to extend the public comment period for an additional 15 days.
80 FR 2067Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 19, 2012
SUMMARY: The EPA is announcing that the period for providing public comments on the December 6, 2011, proposed rule titled, “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Primary Aluminum … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comment Period Due to requests received from industry to extend the public comment period, the EPA is extending the public comment period for an additional 12 days.
77 FR 2677Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 17, 2006
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 63 [EPA-R06-OAR-2005-LA-0004; FRL-8158-9] Approval of the Clean Air Act Section 112(l) Program for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Delegation of Authority … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
71 FR 19674Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 15, 2021
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R06-OAR-2020-0167; FRL-8989-01-R6] Air Plan Approval; New Mexico; Clean Air Act Requirements for Emissions Inventory and Emissions Statement for … Air Act (CAA or the Act) for the Sunland Park ozone nonattainment area for the 2015 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
86 FR 57388Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 9, 2005
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 61 and 63 [R06-OAR-2005-NM-0005; FRL-8006-3] Approval of the Clean Air Act Section 112(l) Program for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Delegation of Authority … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
70 FR 73183Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 12, 2023
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 61 and 63 [EPA-R01-OAR-2022-0496; FRL-10522-01-R1] Approval of the Clean Air Act, Authority for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Asbestos Management and Control … This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 13, 2023. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No.
88 FR 2057Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 18, 2005
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 63 [R06-OAR-2004-TX-0004; FRL-7886-3] Approval of the Clean Air Act Section 112(l) Program for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Delegation of Authority to … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
70 FR 13127Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 26, 2004
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 61 and 63 [LA-69-2-7617b; FRL-7638-6] Approval of the Clean Air Act Section 112(l) Program for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Delegation of Authority to … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
69 FR 15755Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 15, 2004
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 63 [R06-OAR-2004-LA-0001; FRL-7847-7] Approval of the Clean Air Act Section 112(l) Program for Hazardous Air Pollutants and Delegation of Authority to … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
69 FR 75015Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.