Clean Air Act Interim Approval of Operating Permits Program; Delegation of Section 112 Standards; State of Vermont

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 70

[AD-FL-5510-2]

Clean Air Act Interim Approval of Operating Permits Program;

Delegation of Section 112 Standards; State of Vermont

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes interim approval of the Operating Permits

Program submitted by Vermont for the purpose of complying with Federal

requirements for an approvable State program to issue operating permits

to all major stationary sources, and to certain other sources. EPA is

also approving Vermont's authority to implement hazardous air pollutant

requirements.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by

June 24, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to Donald Dahl, Air Permits,

CAP, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, JFK Federal

Building, Boston, MA 02203-2211. Copies of the State's submittal and

other supporting information used in developing the proposed interim

approval are available for inspection during normal business hours at

the following location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1,

One Congress Street, 11th floor, Boston, MA 02203-2211.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Dahl, CAP, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Region 1, JFK Federal Building, Boston, MA 02203-

2211, (617) 565-4298.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background and Purpose

A. Introduction

As required under title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments

(sections 501-507 of the Clean Air Act (``the Act'')), EPA has

promulgated rules which define the minimum elements of an approvable

State operating permits program and the corresponding standards and

procedures by which the EPA will approve, oversee, and withdraw

approval of State operating permits programs (see 57 FR 32250 (July 21,

1992)). These rules are codified at 40 Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR) Part 70. Title V requires States to develop, and submit to EPA,

programs for issuing these operating permits to all major stationary

sources and to certain other sources.

The Act requires that States develop and submit these programs to

EPA by November 15, 1993, and that EPA act to approve or disapprove

each program within 1 year after receiving the submittal. The EPA's

program review occurs pursuant to section 502 of the Act and the part

70 regulations, which together outline criteria for approval or

disapproval. Where a program substantially, but not fully, meets the

requirements of Part 70, EPA may grant the program interim approval for

a period of up to 2 years. If EPA has not fully approved a program by 2

years after the November 15, 1993 date, or by the end of an interim

program, it must establish and implement a Federal program.

B. Federal Oversight and Sanctions

If EPA were to finalize this proposed interim approval, it would

extend for two years following the effective date of final interim

approval, and could not be renewed. During the interim approval period,

the State of Vermont would be protected from sanctions, and EPA would

not be obligated to promulgate, administer and enforce a Federal

permits program for the State of Vermont. Permits issued under a

program with interim approval have full standing with respect to part

70, and the 1-year time period for submittal of permit applications by

subject sources begins upon the effective date of interim approval, as

does the 3-year time period for processing the initial permit

applications 1.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ Note that states may require applications to be submitted

earlier than required under section 503(c). See Subchapter X,

Section 5-1005 of Vermont's rules.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Following final interim approval, if the State of Vermont failed to

submit a complete corrective program for full approval by the date 6

months before expiration of the interim approval, EPA would start an

18-month clock for mandatory sanctions. If the State of Vermont then

failed to submit a corrective program that EPA found complete before

the expiration of that 18-month period, EPA would apply sanctions as

required by section 502(d)(2) of the Act, which would remain in effect

until EPA determined that the State of Vermont had corrected the

deficiency by submitting a complete corrective program. If, six months

after application of the first sanction, the State of Vermont still has

not submitted a corrective program that EPA finds complete, a second

sanction will be required.

If, following final interim approval, EPA were to disapprove the

State of Vermont's complete corrective program, EPA would be required

under section 502(d)(2) to apply sanctions on the date 18 months after

the effective date of the disapproval, unless prior to that date the

State of Vermont had submitted a revised program and EPA had determined

that it corrected the deficiencies that prompted the disapproval. If,

six months after EPA applies the first sanction, the State of Vermont

has not submitted a revised program that EPA has determined corrected

the deficiencies that prompted disapproval, a second sanction will be

required.

Moreover, if EPA has not granted full approval to the State of

Vermont's program by the expiration of an interim approval and that

expiration occurs after November 15, 1995, EPA must promulgate,

administer and enforce a Federal permits program for the State of

Vermont upon interim approval expiration.

II. Proposed Action and Implications

A. Analysis of State Submission

The analysis contained in this document focuses on specific

elements of Vermont's title V operating permits program that must be

corrected to meet the minimum requirements of 40 CFR part 70. The full

program submittal, technical support document (TSD), dated April 19,

1996 entitled ``Technical Support Document--Vermont Operating Permits

Program'', which contains a detailed analysis of the submittal, and

other relevant materials are available for inspection as part of the

public docket. The docket may be viewed during regular business hours

at the address listed above.

1. Title V Program Support Materials

Vermont's title V program was submitted by the State on April 28,

1995 (PROGRAM). The submittal was found to be administratively complete

on June 12, 1995. The PROGRAM consisted of a Governor's letter, program

description, Attorney General's legal opinion, permitting regulations

and enabling legislation, and permitting program documentation.

Included with the PROGRAM submittal was a draft implementation

agreement which will be finalized by EPA and Vermont. The

[[Page 26146]]

agreement outlines procedures for EPA oversight, the state's

administration of the PROGRAM, and state commitments for implementing

future air toxic regulations. On March 6, 1996, Vermont submitted a

supplement to their PROGRAM, which included a revised Attorney General

Opinion, a revised permit form, and a letter of intention for

delegation of standards under sections 111 and 112 of the Clean Air

Act.

2. Title V Operating Permit Regulations and Implementation

Vermont's regulations implementing Part 70 include Environmental

Protection Regulations, Air Pollution Control Chapter V, Definitions

(Sec. 5-101) and Subchapter X (Secs. 5-1001-1016, Operating Permits).

The Vermont PROGRAM, including the operating permit regulations,

substantially meets the requirements of 40 CFR part 70, including

Secs. 70.2 and 70.3 with respect to applicability, Secs. 70.4, 70.5 and

70.6 with the respect to permit content and operational flexibility,

Secs. 70.7 and 70.8 with respect to public participation and review by

affected states and EPA, and Sec. 70.11 with respect to requirements

for enforcement authority. Although the regulations substantially meet

Part 70 requirements, there are program deficiencies that are outlined

in section II.B. below as Interim Approval issues. Those Interim

Approval issues are more fully discussed in the TSD. The ``Issues''

section of the TSD also contains a detailed discussion of elements of

Part 70 that are not explicitly contained in Vermont's regulation, but

which are satisfied by other elements of Vermont's program submittal

and/or other Vermont State law. Also discussed in the TSD are certain

elements of Vermont's title V regulation that are in need of a legal

interpretation and which EPA is interpreting to be consistent with Part

70 with the understanding that Vermont shares such interpretation.

Those elements include: (1) the absence of the language ``[a]ny

national ambient air quality standard or increment or visibility

requirement under Part C of title I of the Act, but only as it would

apply to temporary sources permitted pursuant to section 504(e) of the

Act'' in Vermont's definition of ``applicable requirement''; (2)

Section 5-1014 of Vermont's rule relating to ``off-permit'' changes;

(3) Vermont's treatment of ``insignificant activities'' under Sections

5-1002 and 5-1006; (4) Vermont's authority to make applicability

determinations in Section 5-1003; (5) Vermont's treatment of the

stringency of compliance schedules contained in permits as required by

40 CFR 70.5(8)(iii)(C); (6) Vermont's treatment of certain permit

content elements required by 40 CFR 70.6; (7) Vermont's method for

providing adequate, streamlined, and reasonable procedures for

expeditiously processing permit modifications; and (8) Vermont's

requirements for the time frames and detailed contents of compliance

certifications. EPA understands that Vermont will implement its program

consistent with these interpretations, and will base this interim

approval on these interpretations unless Vermont comments to the

contrary.

Variances. Vermont's Air Quality Variance Board has the authority

to issue a variance from requirements imposed by State law. See 10

V.S.A. Sec. 561. The EPA regards Vermont's variance provisions as

wholly external to the program submitted for approval under Part 70 and

consequently is proposing to take no action on these provisions of

State law. The EPA has no authority to approve provisions of State law

that are inconsistent with the Act. The EPA does not recognize the

ability of a permitting authority to grant relief from the duty to

comply with a federally enforceable Part 70 permit, except where such

relief is granted through procedures allowed by Part 70. A Part 70

permit may be issued or revised (consistent with Part 70 procedures),

to incorporate those terms of a variance that are consistent with

applicable requirements. A Part 70 permit may also incorporate, via

Part 70 permit issuance or revision procedures, the schedule of

compliance set forth in a variance. However, EPA reserves the right to

pursue enforcement of applicable requirements notwithstanding the

existence of a compliance schedule in a permit to operate. This is

consistent with 40 CFR 70.5(c)(8)(iii)(C), which states that a schedule

of compliance ``shall be supplemental to, and shall not sanction

noncompliance with, the applicable requirements on which it is based.''

3. Permit Fee Demonstration

Section 502(B)(3) of the Act requires that each permitting

authority collect fees sufficient to cover all reasonable direct and

indirect costs required to develop and administer its title V operating

permit program. Each title V program submittal must contain either a

detailed demonstration of fee adequacy or a demonstration that the fees

collected exceed $25 per ton of actual emissions per year, adjusted

from the August, 1989 consumer price index (``CPI''). The $25 per ton

was presumed by Congress to cover all reasonable direct and indirect

costs to an operating permit program. This minimum amount is referred

to as the ``presumptive minimum.''

Vermont has opted to make a presumptive fee demonstration. Vermont

has demonstrated that actual emissions emitted from their title V

sources was 5079 tons, excluding carbon monoxide. Vermont's permit fee

legislation requires that each title V source pay an annual fee based

on $800 per facility and $30 per ton. Therefore Vermont will collect

$219,375. Using Vermont's application and emission fees, the State will

collect $43.19 per ton annually which is above the presumptive minimum

adjusted by the CPI.

Therefore, Vermont has demonstrated that the State will collect

sufficient permit fees to meet EPA's presumptive minimum criteria. For

more information, see section VII of Vermont's title V program

documentation.

4. Provisions Implementing the Requirements of Other Titles of the Act

a. Authority and/or Commitments for Section 112 Implementation

Vermont has demonstrated in its title V program submittal adequate

legal authority to implement and enforce all section 112 requirements

through the title V permit. This legal authority is contained in

Vermont's enabling legislation, regulatory provisions defining

``applicable requirements,'' and the requirement that a title V permit

must incorporate all applicable requirements. EPA has determined that

this legal authority is sufficient to allow Vermont to issue permits

that assure compliance with all section 112 requirements and to carry

out all section 112 activities. In addition, given Vermont's

commitments regarding implementation of the State's title V program,

EPA has determined that the State will issue permits that assure

compliance with all section 112 requirements, and will carry out all

section 112 activities. For further discussion of this subject, please

refer to the Technical Support Document, referenced above, and the

April 13, 1993 guidance memorandum titled ``Title V Program Approval

Criteria for Section 112 Activities,'' signed by John Seitz, Director

of the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.

b. Implementation of 112(g) Upon Program Approval

On February 14, 1995, EPA published an interpretive notice (see 60

FR 8333) that postpones the effective date of section 112(g) until

after EPA has promulgated a rule addressing the

[[Page 26147]]

requirements of that provision. The section 112(g) interpretive notice

explains that EPA is still considering whether the effective date of

section 112(g) should be delayed beyond the date of promulgation of the

Federal rule so as to allow States time to adopt rules implementing the

Federal rule, and that EPA will provide for any such additional delay

in the final section 112(g) rulemaking. Unless and until EPA provides

for such an additional postponement of the effective date of section

112(g), Vermont must be able to implement section 112(g) during the

period between promulgation of the Federal section 112(g) rule and

adoption of implementing State regulations for section 112(g)

requirements. EPA believes that Vermont can utilize its preconstruction

permitting program to serve as a procedural vehicle for implementing

the section 112(g) rule and making these requirements Federally

enforceable between promulgation of the Federal section 112(g) rule and

adoption of implementing State regulations for section 112(g). For this

reason, EPA is proposing to approve Vermont's preconstruction

permitting program found in 10 V.S.A. Sec. 5-501 under the authority of

title V and Part 70 solely for the purpose of implementing section

112(g) during the transition period between title V approval and

adoption of a State rule implementing EPA's section 112(g) regulations.

Since the approval would be for the single purpose of providing a

mechanism to implement section 112(g) during the transition period, the

approval would be without effect if EPA decides in the final section

112(g) rule that sources are not subject to the requirements of the

rule until State regulations are adopted. Also, since the approval

would be for the limited purpose of allowing the State sufficient time

to adopt regulations, EPA proposes to limit the duration of the

approval to 18 months following promulgation by EPA of its section

112(g) rule.

c. Program for Straight Delegation of Sections 111 and 112 Standards

The part 70 requirements for approval of a State operating permit

program, specified in 40 CFR 70.4(b), encompass section 112(l)(5)

requirements for approval of a program for delegation of the hazardous

air pollutant program General Provisions, Subpart A, of 40 CFR parts 61

and 63, promulgated under section 112 of the Act, and MACT standards as

promulgated by EPA as they apply to part 70 sources. Section 112(l)(5)

requires that a State's program contain adequate legal authorities,

adequate resources for implementation, and an expeditious compliance

schedule, which are also requirements under Part 70. The Vermont

Department of Environmental Conservation provided a supplemental

request on March 6, 1996, for non-part 70 sources which contained

information regarding adequate legal authorities, adequate resources

for implementation, and an expeditious compliance schedule. Therefore,

EPA is also proposing to grant approval under section 112(l)(5) and 40

CFR 63.91 of Vermont's mechanism for receiving delegation of section

112 standards for both major and area sources, that are unchanged from

the Federal standards as promulgated (straight delegation) and section

112 infrastructure programs such as those programs authorized under

sections 112(i)(5), 112(g), 112(j), and 112(r). In addition, EPA is

reconfirming the delegation of 40 CFR part 60 standards currently

delegated to Vermont as indicated in Table I. Please note EPA has

withdrawn delegation of Subpart XX, ``Bulk Gas Terminals'' per

Vermont's request. Vermont requested the withdrawal because there

currently are no Subpart XX sources in the State.

EPA is proposing to delegate all applicable future 40 CFR parts 60,

61, and 63 standards pursuant to the following mechanism unless

otherwise requested by Vermont.2 Vermont will accept future

delegation of standards by checking the appropriate boxes on a

standardized checklist. The EPA Regional Office will forward a

checklist listing the applicable regulations to Vermont, and Vermont

will accept the Federal standard as promulgated by checking the

appropriate box and returning it to EPA. The details of this delegation

mechanism are set forth in the March 6, 1996 letter containing a

Memorandum of Agreement between EPA and Vermont. This program will

apply to both existing and future standards. The original delegation

agreement between EPA and Vermont was set forth in a letter to Brendan

J. Whittaker dated September 30, 1982. In addition, Vermont has

indicated that for some section 112 standards it may choose to submit a

more stringent State rule or program through section 112(l). EPA will

need to take public notice and comment for any section 112 delegation

other than straight delegation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ The radionuclide National Emission Standards for Hazardous

Air Pollutant (NESHAP) is a section 112 regulation and therefore,

also an applicable requirement under the State operating permits

program for part 70 sources. There is not yet a Federal definition

of ``major source'' for radionuclide sources. Therefore, until a

major source definition for radionuclide is promulgated, no source

would be a major section 112 source solely due to its radionuclide

emissions. However, a radionuclide source may, in the interim, be a

major source under Part 70 for another reason, thus requiring a Part

70 permit. The EPA will work with the State in the development of

its radionuclide program to ensure that permits are issued in a

timely manner.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vermont is implementing this delegation by issuing permits to both

major and area/minor sources. Permits issued to area/minor sources are

not title V permits and therefore may not be federally enforceable.

d. Implementation of Title IV of the Act

Vermont has stated in Section 5-1008(g) of Subchapter X that the

``Secretary shall implement the requirements and provisions of Title IV

of the federal Clean Air Act.''

B. Proposed Action

The scope of Vermont's Part 70 program covers all Part 70 sources

within the state of Vermont, except any sources of air pollution over

which an Indian Tribe has jurisdiction. See, e.g., 59 FR 55813, 55815-

18 (Nov. 9, 1994). The term ``Indian Tribe'' is defined under the Act

as ``any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or

community, including any Alaska Native village, which is Federally

recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided

by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians.''

See section 302(r) of the CAA; see also 59 FR 43956, 43962 (Aug. 25,

1994); 58 FR 54364 (Oct. 21, 1993).

Requirements for approval, specified in 40 CFR 70.4(b), encompass

section 112(l)(5) requirements for approval of a program for delegation

of section 112 standards as promulgated by EPA as they apply to part 70

sources and non-part 70 sources. As discussed above, Vermont's

submittal meets the requirements for EPA approval of delegation of

section 112 standards. Therefore, the EPA is also proposing to grant

approval under section 112(l)(5) and 40 CFR 63.91 of the State's

mechanism for receiving delegation of section 112 standards that are

unchanged from Federal standards as promulgated. Vermont will be

issuing permits containing section 112 standards to both major and

area/minor sources; therefore, EPA is delegating authority to implement

these standards for all sources subject to the standards, not just for

part 70 sources.

The EPA is proposing to grant interim approval to the operating

permits program submitted by Vermont on April 28, 1995. If promulgated,

the State must make the following changes to receive full approval:

[[Page 26148]]

1. Vermont does not allow for ``section 502(b)(10)'' changes at a

title V source. In an August 29, 1994 (59 FR 44572) rulemaking

proposal, EPA proposed to eliminate section 502(b)(10) changes as a

mechanism for implementing operational flexibility. However, the Agency

solicited comment on the rationale for this proposed elimination. If

EPA should conclude, during a final rulemaking, that section 502(b)(10)

changes are no longer required as a mechanism for operational

flexibility, then Vermont will not be required to address 502(b)(10)

changes in its rule.

2. In Sections 5-1014 and 5-1015(a)(11), the program regulation

implementing operational flexibility requirements allows the State the

discretion to incorporate emission trades into a permit, and does not

require that the emissions involved in such trades be quantifiable.

EPA's rule states that when a permitting authority agrees to establish

an emissions cap in a title V permit independent of otherwise

applicable requirements, the permitting authority must include emission

trading provisions for complying with that cap requested by the permit

applicant, as long as those provisions are quantifiable and include the

compliance requirements of 40 CFR 70.6 (a) and (c). EPA's rule also

requires that the emissions involved in such trades be quantifiable

before a title V permit can provide for the trades. See

Sec. 70.4(b)(12)(iii). However, if a source requests an emission trade

that could violate an underlying state requirement, the State has the

discretion to limit any emission trading consistent with the state

requirement when issuing the operating permit.

Vermont must therefore adopt regulatory language requiring the

State to include, upon request by a source, emission trading provisions

in a title V permit for the purpose of complying with an emissions cap

established in the permit, provided that the emissions involved in such

trades are quantifiable. Vermont retains the option to include language

in its regulation that would require all such trades to be consistent

with state requirements as well as applicable requirements.

3. In Section 5-1008(e)(1), the program regulation states that

Vermont has the discretion to reopen and reissue a title V permit for

cause. In Section 5-1008(e)(4) (i)-(vi), the program regulation

enumerates the conditions which would potentially cause Vermont to

reopen a permit. EPA's rule requires a permitting authority to reopen

and reissue a permit when certain conditions exist (or ``for cause'' as

defined by the regulation). See 40 CFR 70.7(f). Thus, Vermont must

change the word ``may'' to ``shall'' in Section 5-1008(e)(1). Vermont

must also include a provision in its rule requiring the State to reopen

and reissue a permit (with a remaining term of 3 or more years) within

18 months of a source's becoming subject to an additional applicable

requirement. See Sec. 70.7(f)(1)(i).

4. Vermont must adopt provisions in Subchapter X which would

require that every permit contain certain terms and conditions as

specified in section 70.6. Vermont's current permit content section,

found at Section 5-1015 of Subchapter X, does not contain all of the

terms and conditions in Sec. 70.6. Section 5-1015 of the program rule

requires permit terms which generally address applicable requirements,

emission monitoring and reporting, and compliance plans. Vermont will

need to add the following missing requirements of section 70.6: (a) a

source's obligation to report promptly any permit deviations (section

70.6(a)(3)(iii)(B)); (b) a source's obligation to maintain a record

when switching between operating scenarios (section 70.6(a)(9)(i)); (c)

the State's obligation to separate in a title V permit those permit

terms which are enforceable by the State only (and to specifically

designate them as such) from those which are enforceable by both the

State and EPA (sections 70.6(b) (1) and (2)); and (d) the State's

obligation to indicate in a title V permit the origin and authority of

all permit terms and conditions, and identify any difference in form as

compared to the applicable requirement upon which a permit term or

condition is based (section 70.6(a)(1)(i)).

There are several ways Vermont could revise its rule to address the

separation of federal and state requirements. One option suggested by

EPA's recent ``White Paper Number 2,'' dated March 5, 1996, is to

clarify which state requirements are not federally-enforceable in the

Findings of Fact section of the draft permit. This separation would

identify for all concerned parties the federal applicable requirements

and the requirements based solely on State law. If Vermont proposed to

consolidate the State and federal requirements in the permit terms and

conditions, Vermont would then have to use the most stringent limit as

the permit condition in the draft permit. If an applicant objected

during the public comment period to the consolidation of federal and

State requirements, Vermont would have to separate the permit

conditions within the enforceable terms and conditions section of the

final permit. Vermont's regulation must clearly provide the permit

applicant the authority to require the State to separate out State-only

permit terms and conditions.

III. Administrative Requirements

A. Request for Public Comments

The EPA is requesting comments on all aspects of this proposed

interim approval. Copies of the State's submittal and other information

relied upon for the proposed interim approval are contained in a docket

maintained at the EPA Regional Office. The docket is an organized and

complete file of all the information submitted to, or otherwise

considered by, EPA in the development of this proposed interim

approval. The principal purposes of the docket are:

(1) to allow interested parties a means to identify and locate

documents so that they can effectively participate in the approval

process, and

(2) to serve as the administrative record in the event of judicial

review. The EPA will consider any comments received by June 24, 1996.

B. Executive Order 12866

The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from

Executive Order 12866 review.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The EPA's actions under section 502 of the Act do not create any

new requirements, but simply address operating permits programs

submitted to satisfy the requirements of 40 CFR Part 70. Because this

action does not impose any new requirements, it does not have a

significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates

Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA

must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or

final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated

costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to

the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA

must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative

that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with

statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan

for informing and advising any small governments that may be

significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.

EPA has determined that the action promulgated today does not

include a Federal mandate that may result in

[[Page 26149]]

estimated costs of $100 million or more to either State, local, or

tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This

Federal action approves preexisting requirements under State or local

law, and imposes no new Federal requirements. Accordingly, no

additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the

private sector, result from this action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70

Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,

Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits,

Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

Dated: May 6, 1996.

John P. DeVillars,

Regional Administrator, Region I.

Table I to the Preamble

Reconfirmation of Part 60 and 61 Delegations

Part 60 Subpart Categories

Da ELECTRIC UTILITY STEAM GENERATORS

Dc SMALL INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL-INSTITUTIONAL STEAM GENERATING UNITS

E INCINERATORS

I ASPHALT CONCRETE PLANTS

RR TAPE AND LABEL SURFACE COATINGS

OOO NONMETALLIC MINERAL PROCESSING PLANTS

UUU CALCINERS AND DRYERS IN MINERALS INDUSTRY

Part 61 Subpart Categories

M ASBESTOS

[FR Doc. 96-13151 Filed 5-23-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P