Documents

Oral argument — People v. Edwards

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2017

So when you apply the first prong of plain air standard to this, to say what we're trying to establish is obviously two things. Was he drunk? Was he driving? … With respect to the state's comment, this was only one small... The burden of proof comment was only one small comment.

Oral argument — County of Knox v. Bell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

My client's property's been cleaned up. And, you know, the ground is full. I mean, you know, it's spring. It thaws. You know, who knows what's going to pop up out of the ground. … Maybe it's a taking of property when you take someone's ability and livelihood away from them over a period of years.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Mankwoski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2014

The problem with cleaning out the system is the man had very severe liver function that made him susceptible to dehydration, and everything they did was meant to clean you out. … Well, if that is the practice and procedure, it violates the Wrongful Death Act.

Oral argument — Moncelle v. C.A.P. Air Freight, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2014

Air Freight, Inc., L.L.C., Matthew Gross, and Justices McDade, Wright, and O'Brien. On behalf of the Appellant, Mr. James Walker. On behalf of C.A.P. Air Freight, Ms. Barbara Snow Murdo. … But that's why we talk about how they don't mean no one wants fat-cleaning standards because they're just saying it must be corruption without a shred of evidence.

Oral argument — David v. Wheaton College

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2014

There's no reason for this meeting if Wheaton College is not acting, or if Mr. Pollard is not acting as an agent for Wheaton College. … And the allegations that I've resided in Rogers, Arkansas, I only periodically travel to the state of Illinois for religious conferences, those go to the claim.

Oral argument — Professional Transportation v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

Those kinds of jobs, particularly in this period of time, were relatively plentiful as shown by Mr. … I can't comment on that. Now, one thing I would suggest. You can't or you don't want to. Both, Your Honor. One thing I would say and concede is that there are two exceptions in Arbitrator G.

Oral argument — Bulletproof Plumbing Corp. v. Ohlson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2025

Subject to the 4 month limitation period. Um, um, even though they're only proceeding against the owner. Not according to the case law. … National theater supply versus bloom and Apollo heating and air conditioning versus American National Bank. I mean, a lien isn't required at all. If the claim is against the owner only and.

Oral argument — In Matter of Estate of Ford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 4, 2010

And it was, quote, I never acted as an attorney for the estate. His entire claim was based upon acting as a co-executor. He got a benefit. … The next door neighbor was keeping an eye on the house during this entire period of time.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Evans

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021

Do we want to clean up? I don't see the appellant. I see Truett. What do you guys see? You see Ms. Rice? Oh, okay. Oh, yeah, right, okay. All right. Counsel, are you ready to proceed? I am. … There are two acts at play here, we do have the, the, the marriage act, and we also have the domestic violence act under the domestic violence act under consideration of a petition for an order protection

Oral argument — Peabody Coal v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2009

I'm talking about within the practical period of time. What is the practical period of time? … It's given notice as soon as practical after the act of disablement.

Oral argument — In re T.L.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2017

I acknowledge that it's taken them some time to sort of get their act together to do what's required under the service plan, but they have done that, are doing to the best of their ability to rectify the … The house, while maybe subjectively not what we would think is clean, has met minimal standards.

Oral argument — Kern v. Illinois Workers' Cook Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 17, 2025

That was an effort to make a substantive change and the limitation period, specifically AJ. … We have one from the, uh, the FAA, the federal air marshal, federal air marshal couldn't see what's going on in the cockpit because for my client to get his bag out of the, the storage area, he has to

Oral argument — People v. Hidou

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2013

So you're talking roughly around the same period of time. … That he, in that case, that he yelled out a gang slogan and made out other comments indicating no remorse over the killing.

Oral argument — People v. Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2012

But the fifth one was that the defendant suffocated Breanna, knowing that those acts would cause, most likely, the death. … When he was later confronted with that statement, his rather flippant comment was, well, too late for that. Got to help me get out of here.

Oral argument — Christophersen v. Franklin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2011

The final comment on the Barrett case, I don't believe the Barrett case has any application. … How do you factor in or put in context a successor counsel's testimony that he thought what he was going to do was just clean up the mistakes or clean up the case?

Oral argument — Board of Trustees of Riverdale Police v. Village of Riverdale

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2014

And he could not comment whether there was financial damage here or not. Our expert witnesses indicated that there was financial damage to the fund. … But the legislature has, at least twice now, continued the period of when the pension funds have to be fully funded.

Oral argument — People v. Davidson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023

That's after a period of time taking this medication. There's no evidence here of, you know, if you take one pill, how is that going to affect that number? How is it going to make it go up and down? … The basis for how he determined this was a vague generalized calculation, and the number that was referenced earlier, 70 to 100 pills, was a number he just crafted or, you know, created out of thin air

Oral argument — Advanced Physicians v. Clifton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2011

It was not out of thin air... What we have here basically... Is a situation... It seems to me... And correct me if I'm wrong... That we have the trial court saying that... The physicians are... … I mean, it wasn't like he was going to go call clean that day. They were busy. He was doubled up. That's correct. That's not a reflection on the trial judge at all.

Oral argument — 1-20-0205

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2021

And it wasn't brought as a separate act. … Did Judge Hall comment on that at all? She commented on two things. She commented on Jeff Lyon, who I'm sorry to say sadly passed away in early December from some illnesses.

Oral argument — People v. Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2026

And so looking at the evidence here, there was enough evidence before the jurors that they could act rationally in acquitting Harris of aggravated discharge of a firearm, yet still find him guilty of this … He did not say that he saw the gun shot up in the air. He didn't say he shot the gun in the air. There is zero evidence of anybody shooting it in the air.