Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
6,243 results
0.81s
Agency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent's failure to act on the Thompsons' 1982.return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
The Notice also advised that all persons desiring to comment on the Plan could submit their comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the Notice. … Countryman Acting Secretary 5 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101(b)(6). 2
Securities and Exchange CommissionThese synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
Agency decision · Agency decision
Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings. … We Welcome Comments About the Internal Revenue Bulletin If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it, we would be pleased to
Internal Revenue ServiceAgency decision · Agency decision
I am 15 Bill Blumenthal, and as the clean-up hitter, I suppose 16 I'm going to reshape my comments a little bit to address 17 some of the things that were said by the three earlier 18 batters. … KWOKA: Two comments.
Federal Trade CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
Given the fact that the Thompsons did not retain DeCastro until November 1986, respondent’s failure to act on the Thompsons’ 1982 return before the expiration of the 3-year period of limitations could … Accordingly, the period of limitations for that year expired in May 1986.
United States Tax CourtAgency decision · Agency decision
(Exchange Act Rel. … Fund recipients (Exchange Act Rel.
Securities and Exchange CommissionFederal Register / Vol. 71, No. 126 / Friday, June 30, 2006 / Notices
Agency decision · Agency decision
to comments. … SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA’s Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision (IRED) for the organophosphate (OP) pesticide dichlorvos (DDVP), and opens a public comment period on
Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionUNITED STATES tfEliTON ~(l? :i~)c;!d
Agency decision · Agency decision
Tyle December 8, 1999 Page 2 Generally, under the 1940 Act, fuds may, but are not required to, suspend redemptions and postpone payment for redemptions already tendered for any period durng which the … This definition also is used in Rule 2a-4 under the 1940 Act as the required basis for computing periodically the current NA V of funds for the purpose of pricing their shares.
Securities and Exchange CommissionU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Agency decision · Agency decision
Congress a Management Report, containing certain statistical tables and any comments deemed appropriate, to accompany the Office of Inspector General’s (OIG’s) Semiannual Report. 1 This Management Report … During the reporting period, OIG did not issue a report that 1 The SEC’s Management Response is based on the requirements of Section 5 of the Inspector General Act as amended by the James M.
Securities and Exchange CommissionAgency decision · Agency decision
It would be unnecessary and contrary to the public interest for the IRS to continue to charge the current, higher user fee during the period provided for public comment on the proposal to reduce that fee … DATES: Electronic or written comments must be received by July 21, 2025. ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly encouraged to submit public comments electronically.
Internal Revenue Service
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.