Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Steven Newkirk

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2026

A reasonable sentence in this case should include, at the least, a non-token period of incarceration. Just some kind of statement. A non-what? Token period of incarceration. Non-token period. … I mean, while on pretrial release and the court commented back on that. The court commented on the fact that if you mess up, your son is gonna pay the price. He talked... Mr.

Oral argument — Lacey Sivak v. John Hardison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2010

These are not just the occasional stray comment from the street. We haven't even talked about them. … We don't really, in court, act based on knowledge or even upon facts. We act upon evidence.

Oral argument — Kahea v. NMFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2013

If it's large enough that they are discharging, discharge is large enough over 100,000 pounds of product, then they would have to get a permit, a Clean Water Act permit from EPA. … You know, the Magnuson Act doesn't – If it got big enough. If it got big enough, they would have to get a clean water permit, not from this particular defendant, but from the EPA.

Oral argument — WILDER v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2012

that prior period of civilian service to satisfy this requirement for a subsequent period as a contract negotiator for the Department of Health and Human Services. … You know, we have to give deference to that since it's an agency regulation enacted with notice and comment and all of that.

Oral argument — United States v. Kalb

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2017

The court said that this was an accidental electrocution during an act of vandalism and that this is not like an act of violence where a fleeing suspect who is armed poses an emerging threat to public … So my only point here is that we're not dealing with a clean slate. Healy, in fact, talks about the flip sides of a single coin.

Oral argument — Rachel v. Sershen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2011

There's an obliteration of air and light. And there is no gutters. An obliteration of air and light. There's an obliteration. … It obliterates the air and it obliterates the light and it confines the air. Aren't you a little far over your skis on that one?

Oral argument — Bethpage Water District v. Nor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 29, 2017

There were comments on what's called their remedial investigation report for OU3 and complaining about the model. … There should not only be knowledge, which there clearly was here, but there should be a reasonable water district should have had to act or did act to address the contamination.

Oral argument — Monk v. Wilkie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2019

And the fact that legislative action may occur in the future is not a reason to not act. … And the injunction that the class members seek is that the VA adjudicate these appeals within a certain period of time. That period of time is a question for the merits.

Oral argument — Young v. Lumenis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2007

Cleaned up a bit. It's been cleaned up. The reality of this here is this part here is the claw, which is not at issue. The part that we're talking about is this tiny part here. … That is not really ever cited in the papers except in passing in the reply when they commented on our brief.

Oral argument — Martin Walsh v. Medical Staffing of America, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2023

multiple states over a six-year period. … Not the like things that would apply if they were cleaning the hospital as well, right?

Oral argument — SOL v. Timberline South LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2019

I mean, you can clean clothes in a lot of ways with soap. You can clean them with rocks and water. … So that's a certain period of time that is not commuting time. That's considered work time because you're driving that equipment to get the fuel that you need.

Oral argument — Elassaadvs Independence Air

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2010

In the Air Carrier Access Act, Congress directed the Secretary of Transportation to promulgate regulations that would both ensure nondiscriminatory treatment of qualified handicapped individuals, but also … Taj Mahal deals with the Airline Deregulation Act express preemption.

Oral argument — Walker Broadcasting Company, I v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2016

of that The commission doesn't waive The construction period The three year construction period As discussed in our brief The commission in 1998 Revised its rules to adopt Automatic forfeiture provision … and operate Here we needed an application That included an interference study To get on the air and operate It's the same thing In the Clear Channel decision Approving this staff practice of waiver Also

Oral argument — Protect Our Communities Fo v. AGRI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2012

, responses to their comments submitted. … No, you're actually over, but we'll give you a short period for rebuttal. Thank you. Okay. Do you have a time agreement? Yes, Your Honor, we do.

Oral argument — People v. Peters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2017

Isn't any comment on his failure to say to the police, he was holding a gun on me, I was acting in self-defense. Isn't it harmless here or beyond a reasonable doubt? Not at all, not at all. … But in any event, even if these two statements were air, and even if it was air for the state to question Officer Lowey, and even if it was air for us to cross-examine the defendant on what he didn't say

Oral argument — United States v. Juan Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010

Then we give him Miranda and, you know, that's a cleaning act. We can do whatever we want. But on one level, of course, they did that because he wouldn't have been there. Right. … I think there was probable cause, frankly, in the morning from the 8.30 to 9.30 period when defendant is acting as a lookout. Even at that point, there would have been probable cause. Sorry.

Oral argument — GALLAGHER v. CITY OF WEST COVINA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2005

It was 18 trial days over a two-month period, but it's still a long trial. … The trial was 18 court days and two months ongoing without any other significant comments being made or suggestion of improper evidence or comment by counsel.

Oral argument — 74277) SUAREZ-SIMICH v. ASHCROFT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2004

I would like to go back to, we made this comment about the, he was having problems because of his whistleblowing activity. … the Air Force.

Oral argument — Quantlab Technologies, Limited v. Vitaliy G

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017

So the portals is just the front system that goes in, and when we were getting everything ready and cleaned up, we cleaned up the portals to wrap up everything to be transferred out, and that's what I … But he was in a conspiracy, the conspiracy that the jury had, the evidence that the jury had before them, throughout that whole 3-1 Act play time period.

Oral argument — United States v. Peter Wright

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2011

Air fresheners. Air fresheners. … But the government acted as if it was my responsibility to do it.