Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.56s
Petition — Busic v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
i 1975), cert. den., 423 U.S. 358, 96 S. Ct. 111, 46 L. … Kenny, 462 F.2d 1205 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 914 (1972); United States v. Johnson, 462 F.2d Af 423 (3rd Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 932 (1973).
446 U.S. 398Reply Brief — Gumby v. General Public Utilities Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992
Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 (1975), appellate review of remand orders was considered impossible. … Thermtron, 423 U.S. at 355 (Rehnquist, J., dissenting).
503 U.S. 906Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Archdiocese of Milwaukee v. Superior Court of California
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2004
Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila, 280 U.S. 1 (1929). … Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 296 (1980); Burger King, supra, 471 U.S. at 475.
542 U.S. 919Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lochman v. County of Charlevoix
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 479 U.S. 418, 423, 107 S.Ct. 766, 770, 93 L.Ed.2d 781 (1987). … Ass'n, 496 U.S. 498, 508, 110 S. Ct. 2510, 2517 (1990) (citing Wright v. Roanoke Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 479 U.S. 418, 423, 107 S. Ct. 766, 770 (1987)).
519 U.S. 1112Jurisdictional Statement — Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1987
Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983); see also Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923). … Feldman, supra, 460 U.S. at 482-83 n.16.
481 U.S. 1Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 9, 2025
Murray, 601 U.S. at 38 (quoting Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644, 656 (2020)). … Dkt. # 465 at 166-67; Dkt. # 423-3 at 6-8.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002
Fleming, 73 F.2d 423, 427 (4" Cir. 1934) (where a court of competent jurisdiction has taken possession of property, the court may not only issue all writs necessary to protect its possession from physical … As both fiduciaries were under the control of their respective Courts, neither was under a “controlled taxpayer” within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 482.
Jurisdictional Statement — East Texas Lines v. Frozen Food Exp.
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1956
BE as Ci hd eek ows ie on U.S Baltimore and Ohio R. Co., 333 U. S. 169; . . 43's. Ct. le Be | NA nee arene” 3 ' United States v. Carner, 260 U.S. 482, 490 ........ +B U. S..v. Hancock. … Carver, 260 U, S. 482, 490.
351 U.S. 49Petition — Kelley v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Exh. 1, Tr. 10-16, 298-299, 403-411, 418-423, 425-432). 1 Sachse, Innis, Dover, McGuire, Sides, Yarbro, Reynolds, and Perryman. … Bachowski, 421 U.S. 560, 95 S.Ct. 1851, 44 L.Ed.2d 377 (1975), holding that 29 U.S.C. § 482 exclusively governs post-election procedures) does not render even that effort an unprotected activity.
430 U.S. 933Supplemental Brief — Zimmerman v. Oregon Department of Justice
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 2001
Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996). 6, 8 Vance Vv. … Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 451 (1991); Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. 93 (1979); Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307 (1976) (per curiam). 3 “presumption” in favor of liability.
531 U.S. 1189Jurisdictional Statement — Bowen v. Owens
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1986
S09, & 101(a). 64 Stat. 482 Statutes and regulations—Continued: Pub L. No. 85-840, 72 Stat. 1013 et seq.: Pub. Pub. 20 C. Section 403. section 404. Section 404. … Ch. 809, § 101(a), 64 Stat. 482.' As in the case of widows, widowers lost their entitlement to benefits upon remarriage. 64 Stat. 485 (§ 202(f\1)(A).
476 U.S. 340Petition — Homer v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977
Mazzei, 521 F.2d 639 (3rd Cir. 1975), cert. den. 423 U.S. 1014, 96 S.Ct. 446 Z P 15 : Miscellaneous Authorities. … Mazzei, 521 F.2d 639 (3rd Cir. 1975), cert. den. 423 U.S. 1014, 96 S.Ct. 446 (1975).
431 U.S. 954Amicus Curiae Brief — Loudoun County, Virginia, Petitioner v. Dulles Duty Free, LLC
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2018
See Michelin Tire, 423 U.S. at 301. … Michelin Tire, 423 U.S. at 285-86.
Opposition Brief — George P. Naum, III, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jul 23, 2021
Moore, 423 U.S. at 136 n.12. … Moore, 423 U.S. at 139.
Petition — Sanchez v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984
See U.S. v. Harris, 482 F.2d 1115, 1119 (3d Cir. 1973). … See U.S. v. Hyde, supra, at 865; U.S. v. Harris, 482 F.2d 1115, 1119 (3d Cir. 1973).
466 U.S. 904Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Civelli v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Guzman, 754 F.2d 482 (2d Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1054 (1986). … Castaneda, 555 F.2d 605, 611 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 847 (1977); United States v. Neville, 516 F.2d 1302, 1305 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 925 (1975).
493 U.S. 966Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1977
U.S. at 50, 46 L. … U.S. at 52, 46 L.
434 U.S. 856Respondents Brief — United States v. Padilla
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1993
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987)... 2... eee ee. Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (1983) ...... Gelston v. Hoyt, 16 U.S. [3 Wheat.] 246 ER RENE AR Ol haan Horton v. … Lisk, 522 F.2d 228 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1078 Pn 6uesunde ddd bkeséeedSsecesess United States v.
508 U.S. 77Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Southland Corp. v. Keating
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1984
Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 422-423 (1979). B. … Tastee Freez Intern., Inc., 482 F.Supp. 1213 (E.D.
465 U.S. 1Federal Register · Notice · Apr 18, 2000
closes June 1, 2000 For further information contact: Kathryn Hollander, U.S. … Department of Commerce, Tel: 202-482-3855, Fax: 202-482-5666, E-mail Nazir_Bhagat@ita.doc.gov FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reginald Beckham , U.S. Department of Commerce.
65 FR 20803Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.