Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.09s
Reply Brief — James Erin McKinney, Petitioner v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 9, 2019
Fleming, 61 So.3d 399 (Fla. 2011) ........................................ 3 State v. Kilgore, 216 P.3d 393 (Wash. 2009) .................................... 3 State v. … See Pet. 24; see also Arizona Capital Representation Project and Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice Amicus Br. 3, 6-7. The State does not identify any vehicle problems, and there are none.
Reply Brief — Joe Elton Nixon, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 26, 2022
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) ....................10 Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 (1985) ......................2 Godfrey v. Georgia, 446 U.S. 420 (1980) .......................9 Hall v. … In light of Florida’s uniquely errorprone death penalty system (Pet. 24), the Court should reject that argument. 2 The canvass in the opposition brief (Opp. 17) is outdated (e.g., in its inclusion of
Reply Brief — Kari MacRae, Petitioner v. Matthew Mattos, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 14, 2025
No. 24-355 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _________ KARI MACRAE, v. … Educ., 357 U.S. 399 (1958); Shelton, 364 U.S. 479; Keyishian v. Bd. of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967); United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (1967).
Safety Zone: Santa Cruz Wharf 100th Anniversary Fireworks Display
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 21, 2014
Dykman at 415-399-3585, or email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. Dated: April 29, 2014. Gregory G.
79 FR 29139Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardSafety Zone; Redwood City 4th of July Fireworks Show; Port of Redwood City, Redwood City, CA
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 23, 2013
Dykman at 415-399-3585, or email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. … Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547. Dated: April 1, 2013. Cynthia L.
78 FR 23869Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardSecurity Zones; San Francisco Bay, CA
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 25, 2003
L. 99-399), Congress amended section 7 of the Ports and Waterways Safety Act (PWSA), 33 U.S.C. 1226, to allow the Coast Guard to take actions, including the establishment of security and safety zones, … [FR Doc. 03-29387 Filed 11-24-03; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
68 FR 66064Homeland Security DepartmentCoast GuardPetitioners Reply Brief — United States v. Ross
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1982
carefully analyzed the benefits gener- ally derived from warrants, and shown that they are greatly attenuated in the context of a search of a seized container such as respondent’s paper bag (Br. 21-24 … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970), and limit the automobile search exception to exigent cir- cumstances created by the mobility of an unsecured auto- mobile on the highway.
456 U.S. 798Reply Brief — Pennsylvania v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1972
This Honorable Court has set forth the underlying prin- ciples governing railroad reorganizations in New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 US 392, 26 LEd 2d 691, 90 SCt. 2054 (1970), in which Mr. … Co., 26 F Supp 18, 24, aff’d sub nom Palmer v. 10 Warren, supra.
409 U.S. 894Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 9, 2019
Id. at 399 (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 327 (1995)). … See 569 U.S. at 386-87, 399, 401. The Berry decision clearly does not constitute evidence under the traditional sense of the word.
Reply Brief — Hilao v. Revelstoke Investment Investment Investment Corp., Inc. (No. 08-1019)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2008
International Yachting Group, Inc., 252 F.3d 399 (5th Cir. 2001) and Jalapeno Prop. Mgmt., LLC v. … For that reason, Revelstoke had no Rule 24 property interest whatsoever in the Hawai’i judgment and its intervention was improper.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 27, 2026
No. 24-889 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ____________________________ HIKMA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC., et al., Petitioners, v. … Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
Petitioners Brief — United States v. Henry
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1980
24 Webster’s New International Dictionary CR A ID ecieereteacennnanatcaceane 21, 24 Iu the Supreme Court of the United States OCTOBER TERM, 1979 No. 79-121 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER … accused against an erroneous or improper prosecution.” 399 U.S. at 9 (plurality opinion).
447 U.S. 264Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 17, 2021
Gonzales, 399 F.3d at 1231 (quoting Leon, 468 U.S. at 923). … Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1225 (10th Cir. 2005). (Doc. 39 at 18).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alvarez v. Nebraska
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1968
Presentence Investigation Re- ‘port, p. 24. … S. 399 (1966).
393 U.S. 823Reply Brief — Cal. Franchise Tax Bd. v. Hyatt, 135 S. Ct. 2940 (2015) (No. 14-1175)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2015
[Serene Coa TE APR 24 2015 No. 14-1175 ICE OF THE CLERK IN THE Supreme Court of the United States FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner, Vv. GILBERT P. … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 TIT itntedaiasieiestenarneenntineeetaninnadiitieamenimemaaiticiniitaes 7 Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 (1974), overruled on other grounds by Davis v.
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 25, 2009
Example: A marketable order to sell 399 shares of security XYZ is received by Exchange systems at 12:00:00. … E9-14956 Filed 6-24-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
74 FR 30337Securities and Exchange CommissionAnnouncement of Funding Awards; Fair Housing Initiatives Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2008
Federal Register · Notice · Sep 22, 2011
Implementing regulations are found at 24 CFR part 125. … Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70130 (617) 399-0491 6 275,000.00 Arizona Fair Housing Center: 615 N 5th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85003 (602) 548-1599 9 275,000.00 Southern California
76 FR 58830Housing and Urban Development DepartmentOpposition Brief — Vanderhide v. Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1975
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) .................... 9 Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6 (196997 10 Morrison v. California, 291 U.S. 82 (1934) 11 People v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970). Therefore, the Appellate Division correctly held that peti- tioner’s motion to suppress that evidence should have been denied.
422 U.S. 1009Amicus Curiae Brief — Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Rose
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Commissioner, 373 N.W.2d 399 (N.D. 1985) in a case brought by several out-of-state insurance companies. … City of Buffalo, 59 A.D.2d 1938, 399 N.Y.S.2d 788 (1977) ; Hurd v.
481 U.S. 1025Opposition — Richardson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
Udall, 262 F.Supp. 583, aff'd, 399 F.2d 616, cert. denied, 393 U.S. EN nce cuss cides adaeenteie aeeeitinenaicas 9 Texas & N.O.R. Co. v. Ry. … Ore. 1966), aff'd, 399 F.2d 616 (9th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1025 (1969) (emphasis added).
444 U.S. 1014
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.