Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Backlund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2011

The thrust of the argument is that their authority to make this a crime comes from the Organic Act. The Organic Act says in order to prevent fires and depredations in the forest, you can make rules. … They cleaned up the site. It was only after they finished cleaning it up that the Forest Service suddenly invented this crime to charge them with. Now, so that's the first argument.

Oral argument — Kennedy v. Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2009

The Air Force. Ms. Solomon. May it please the Court, Counsel, Arielle Solomon on behalf of the Petitioner, good morning. … In this case, the Air Force was required to defend against the claim for 21 years until the very eve of the hearing.

Oral argument — Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. Sun Pharma Global FZE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

However, the question is whether or not they must be chemically distinct, which is an additional requirement placed on top of the very clean language that is before the court today. … What they're trying to do is get a complete coating because you may get some air, not bubbles, but you may get some surface tension that creates an incomplete coating.

Oral argument — Morrison v. Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

Do you have any comment on those cases, if you're familiar with them? A few things. First, Your Honor, if we start with the statute where we must, and I'm sorry, let's back up. … So not only was it not acted on, there was no issuance. And whether, in fact, and this really is troubling, it wasn't issued. It was tucked away.

Oral argument — Anderson v. Michaelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2004

This is a fraudulent transfer case that arises under the Arizona Fraudulent Transfer Act, and we fundamentally are dealing with two errors by the District Court. … That's the only one commented on the judge. Everything else he's silent on because of his error in applying the standard of law. I apparently am out of time. Okay.

Oral argument — Shaun Burney v. Ron Broomfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2026

And the only act that Bernie took was firing once. You mean the only act he took was opening the trunk, looking at the guy, taking out his gun, and putting one in the guy's head? … Turning to the court's comments and the due process claim, the court's comments did not render Mr. Bernie's trial fundamentally unfair.

Oral argument — United States v. Alexander

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2021

In Palmer, this court noted that the Supreme Court has made clear that this time period that matters is the entire period, quote, from the initial stop to the detainee's departure. … I think that that, that comment would be reviewed for clear error, your honor.

Oral argument — Gary Epple v. BNSF Railway Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2019

The case concerns the Federal Railroad Safety Act, which is a whistleblower federal statute. Is it a whistleblower statute without Air 21? … So if the secretary acts, you can go to district court. If the secretary doesn't act, you can also go to district court?

Oral argument — People v. Barrett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2014

Pursuant to the plea, he would serve 15 years at 85%, and then he would be subject to an MSR period of from three years to life. Mr. … I hope they're not using it to clean. It goes to the integrity of the exhibit. It applies to her argument, doesn't it? It could have been contaminated.

Oral argument — Darrin Erlichman v. Stater Bros. Markets

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2014

He said that he'd been with the company for 11 years, and that at least during the 10-year period they had been using the voluntary quit. … During a 10-year period, this union took only one grievance to arbitration against Stater Brothers, one out of 50 to 100.

Oral argument — Peterson v. Kirsch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2026

We don't have, as required by the local rule, a redlined draft of the proposed amendment and then a clean draft of the proposed amendment that never came up. So that is not an issue. … Gay was involved in this matter during that time period.

Oral argument — Airlines for America v. TSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2015

But in the 2013 Budget Act, Congress opted for a simpler approach and changed the focus from employments to one-way trips. … And there is a longer period for international flights than it could be. I'm afraid I'm just not sure of the answer. If an international flight is involved, in some instances it's 12 hours.

Oral argument — Akhlaghpour v. Orantes

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2025

So once it's cleaned up and we determine the bankruptcy court isn't going to exercise jurisdiction over this claim and that the state court may, then it should be able to proceed. … Can you comment on that? I mean, why isn't that a win for you, that it's just the post-petition claims, that's all that was authorized?

Oral argument — Woody v. Willaredt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2015

And you should probably wash your hands and be clean and dispose of its waste properly. … Period. Oh, I agree. Okay. Go ahead. Application of the Illinois Religious Freedom and Restoration Act allows this court to affirm the hearing officer's finding that Mr.

Oral argument — Nidec Motor Corporation v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2017

Alternatively, the control signals may represent a desired air flow to be produced by the air moving component. And it's those desires that are interpreted from the thermostat. … It emits enough light to-to... for me to make the comments to you that I have and to have the concerns as I've expressed them to you. I understand, Your Honor, and the-the...

Oral argument — People v. Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 21, 2012

Your mother wants to know that you came clean to the police. Didn't they set up the questions before they made the call? Again, Your Honor, even if they had set it up, it doesn't matter. … These are separate acts and separate issues. The fact that these, this is a Hawkins case and not a, not the cases cited by a defendant.

Oral argument — Howard v. Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2017

When you do send it to the other side, boom, that's a clean rule. We know that you've discharged your obligation. … It's a less clean rule, right? How are you – unless you're able to show that you have been literally keeping track of this, it seems like just giving them the documents is clean.

Oral argument — Swan Moss, III v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2018

And the Arkansas Supreme Court has told us that we should interpret this act as broadly as possible to provide the fullest extent of coverage as possible. … that on their own testimony and their own environmental assessment, before they had the late filed on their reply brief explanation, they said this is going to be used for improvements, end of story, period

Oral argument — Cynthia Prosterman v. American Airlines, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2018

Even without the meeting, what the court did was, against all precedent, took each and every separate act and analyzed each act, and finding that in itself it did not state a claim. … And that refers to an alleged agreement by the airlines to, quote, prevent air travelers from being able to combine the least expensive, nonrefundable one-way fares.

Oral argument — United States v. Gerardo Farias-Contreras

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2022

And also, it is under plain air review, right? … So, the fourth element of plain air is usually something like that the air, if not corrected, would impugn the integrity fairness, integrity, or reputation of the court. Is that right?