Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Shawn Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2009

Now, interestingly enough, Sean Jackson, when he was questioned, made a comment that's very similar to that, that kind of has not been picked up on by the defense in this case. … My experience is that the defense expert brings it in, and that property is on there, and then that defense expert wipes the hard drive clean before they leave the facility.

Oral argument — Shaun Burney v. Ron Broomfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2026

And the only act that Bernie took was firing once. You mean the only act he took was opening the trunk, looking at the guy, taking out his gun, and putting one in the guy's head? … Turning to the court's comments and the due process claim, the court's comments did not render Mr. Bernie's trial fundamentally unfair.

Oral argument — Morrison v. Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2017

Do you have any comment on those cases, if you're familiar with them? A few things. First, Your Honor, if we start with the statute where we must, and I'm sorry, let's back up. … So not only was it not acted on, there was no issuance. And whether, in fact, and this really is troubling, it wasn't issued. It was tucked away.

Oral argument — STEINER v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2007

No, your comment suggested to me that you could have even gotten more than what you did, than what this settlement is for today. … There was years of violative acts on the part of ABC. And if you look at. . . They made a big deal about the statute of limitations.

Oral argument — Merwyn Levering v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2017

substantive continuity test and she applied that test This courts going to review this de novo to determine whether he's an armed career criminal But you're going to review her factual findings for clear air … Thank you I Just had a brief comment, I just wanted to hammer home the substantive continuity of the crime at issue here You know, there's a lot of talk about these different victims and different aggressions

Oral argument — Schofield v. Metropolitan Life

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2008

determined, you know, what is the clean record and what is the record we're going to go from? … Smith to go ahead and comment further on some other types of positions. I don't know what the reason was for asking for that comment. But it doesn't take away from the question. But it's not a Q&A.

Oral argument — Kale Flagg v. Denise Elliot

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2016

Should we continue this line of cases that leads us there, or should we clean that up? … Why did you file the statute before the exhaustion period had expired? Again, out of the abundance of caution for the prescriptive period.

Oral argument — Johnson v. Smith Kline

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2013

Well, I'm not sure I followed your initial comment there about you'd have to know people's driving records. … holdings acts.

Oral argument — Federal Republic of Germany v. Philipp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2020

But getting back to the issue of timing, in the Clarification Act of 2016, Congress defined the covered period as beginning in 1933. … Could you address the question that I asked earlier about the definition of a covered period in the 2016 Clarification Act?

Oral argument — Anderson v. Michaelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2004

This is a fraudulent transfer case that arises under the Arizona Fraudulent Transfer Act, and we fundamentally are dealing with two errors by the District Court. … That's the only one commented on the judge. Everything else he's silent on because of his error in applying the standard of law. I apparently am out of time. Okay.

Oral argument — Save Our Sandy v. The Department of Agriculture

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2016

I'll begin by just making a few comments about Greer because that was one of the main topics of counsel's comments. I will say this. … And it's limited to the procedures in the administrative review act.

Oral argument — United States v. Castillo-Santana

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2022

Here, there's no indication that the prosecutor was acting in bad faith that would increase the possible prejudice. … And that's another reason why clean air applies because there were curative measures after that and there was no renewal of the motion for mistrial or any dissatisfaction with the curative measures.

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Backlund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2011

The thrust of the argument is that their authority to make this a crime comes from the Organic Act. The Organic Act says in order to prevent fires and depredations in the forest, you can make rules. … They cleaned up the site. It was only after they finished cleaning it up that the Forest Service suddenly invented this crime to charge them with. Now, so that's the first argument.

Oral argument — Tibbetts v. Kulongoski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2009

Where does the 19-day period fall in there? It falls outside of that limit. It's a more difficult question there. … And then it says, except where noted, at all material times, Kuligowski was acting in the course and scope of his employment with the state of Washington.

Oral argument — United States v. Hannibal Moore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2022

The government argued that his period of five-year probation should be included in that period of confinement to bring it within the 10-year period. … a firearm, such as a felon, possesses that firearm and then ultimately uses it in an act of purported self-defense.

Oral argument — Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. Sun Pharma Global FZE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2017

However, the question is whether or not they must be chemically distinct, which is an additional requirement placed on top of the very clean language that is before the court today. … What they're trying to do is get a complete coating because you may get some air, not bubbles, but you may get some surface tension that creates an incomplete coating.

Oral argument — United States v. Alexander

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2021

In Palmer, this court noted that the Supreme Court has made clear that this time period that matters is the entire period, quote, from the initial stop to the detainee's departure. … I think that that, that comment would be reviewed for clear error, your honor.

Oral argument — Peterson v. Kirsch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2026

We don't have, as required by the local rule, a redlined draft of the proposed amendment and then a clean draft of the proposed amendment that never came up. So that is not an issue. … Gay was involved in this matter during that time period.

Oral argument — Tweed New Haven Airport Author

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2018

It's not safe, period. Therefore, you don't have commercial aviation there. … How does that have to do with air safety?

Oral argument — POSNANSKI v. GIBNEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2005

Gibney was acting as. And so the issue comes up with frauds and concealment. You only need eight days, and you're home free. … I'd like to comment on the choice of law question, but first I'll answer your question. Thank you.