Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.09s
Oral argument — Ashley Creek Properties, LLC v. J.R. Simplot Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2010
injuries but under the laws of this circuit, the Port of Australia case the Ranchers Cattlemen's Association case those are not disqualifiers where they are clearly connected to the basic purposes of the act … permitted an amicus filing here the issue whether or not there is a ready alternative source wholly unconsidered is central to the issues here If I may then just briefly and it will take a very brief time to comment
32 min of audioOral argument — The Prime Insurance Syndicate, Inc. v. Woods
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2011
In other words, it distinguishes between the act by an agent of assault and battery versus the act of allowing the act to occur by a third party. … You need to go clean that up. Would that have been the proper way to supervise? Absolutely.
50 min of audioOral argument — Spanish Court Two Condominium Association v. Carlson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2013
In fact, the statute requires that they have an opportunity to examine the budget and to comment on the budget. … And my point is if the association is going to be Dracula, then it's got to have clean hands. It has to be in compliance with its duties under the declaration, which is a contract.
44 min of audioOral argument — Cytline, LLC v. Public Utility District No. 2
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2021
And the comments in that white paper, the draft comments in the white paper indicate that they and other industries, despite the fact that they admit that the criteria that they've used would, if you read … In fact, a future industry did show up, clean energy, as I mentioned before, completely experimental, looking for 350 megawatts of power, which is more than half of Grant's current load.
33 min of audioOral argument — Toni Massey v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2022
This is a Social Security case arising under Title II of the Social Security Act. … That was with respect to the dispensary job that she worked at for a short period.
23 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Kahn
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2021
act outside the normal course. … Khan, in this unique circumstance, he's cleaning his office, which suggests he wasn't normally keeping files at home.
30 min of audioOral argument — National Council of Agricultural Employers v. DOL
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2025
And everyone knows what that is, and people act accordingly. … The force of law can only be withdrawn based on notice and comment. Correct.
38 min of audioOral argument — Adams v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2017
And the third consideration, which may be the most important, is that Major Adams is a United States Air Force graduate. He was an officer in the United States Air Force for 11 years. He was a pilot. … When you say it's discretion, is the consequence of that that that's not litigable through, was it the Military Pay Act or some, under the Tucker Act, that's not litigable, or just it's reviewable but
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Bailey-Snyder
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2019
This is some kind of something short of vouching like speculation or fair comment. … As you said in response to Judge Schricker's question, it's administrable, it's clean, it has the virtue of clarity and predictability. But it's also categorical.
32 min of audioOral argument — Froedtert Health, Inc. v. Factory Mutual Insurance Compa
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2023
The period of liability provision, which is very similar to the period of restoration provision in Sandy Point. And I can guide the panel to where that is. It's Appendix 90 to 91. Okay. … Any closing comment? Just one closing comment. We never got to the point.
30 min of audioOral argument — Davis v. Lempke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2019
research I'm doing research I'm doing research I'm doing research and he didn't know he know he did not knowingly ever mislead his client and that's illustrated by the fact that when he realized his air … I oh geez I blew it there's a whole history here and that's that's what I'm relying on if I could I see that my reply time is also up but just there was a suggestion that that that the lawyer has to act
29 min of audioOral argument — Zbitnoff v. James
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2017
The act 250, The vermont Supreme court Has decided not Just that the Act is preempted But doesn't Apply to this Case. … It was a Decision the Act didn't Apply. And that's Consistent with What the Air force Said in The eis About act 250. I see my Time is up. So unless The court has Any other Questions. Thank you, Mr.
34 min of audioOral argument — Village of Bedford Park v. Expedia, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2017
What about a cleaning service? They provide a portion of the hotel's operating needs, but yet I don't think anybody would make an argument that the cleaning service is the operator of the hotel. … I would say that that would be more important than a cleaning service, as the cleaning service doesn't provide any right to stay in the room, and what's taxed here is the use and privilege of renting a
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Damion Hallmon
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2025
But, you know, air freshener is obviously common. … Kushner, for your service under the Criminal Justice Act. And case number 24-1837 is submitted for decision by the Court. Ms. Laska.
31 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2008
My most important comment, and I'm very interested in it, and I hope the government counsel will address this, is this. … Well, we're talking about a seven-month period where there was no back pay, just the period of the indefinite suspension. How much money is involved? Seven months of pay, Your Honor.
34 min of audioOral argument — STEINER v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2007
No, your comment suggested to me that you could have even gotten more than what you did, than what this settlement is for today. … There was years of violative acts on the part of ABC. And if you look at. . . They made a big deal about the statute of limitations.
52 min of audioOral argument — Cadillac of Naperville, Inc. v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2023
I had a situation once where a guy was cleaning his rifle at his workstation. We didn't necessarily have a clean your rifle at work and pointed at your coworkers. … Here the agency acted very reasonably. I think this court would agree given the fact that this is a very unique set of circumstances.
25 min of audioOral argument — Rivera v. LT Redfern Etal
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2024
Rivera, particularly in the open-air cage, because, you know, they all themselves wore gas masks. … Rivera would be entitled to the inference that, you know, it was early on in that time period.
37 min of audioOral argument — People v. Robinson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2015
He told an ASA in that stipulation that he had a screwdriver in his pocket because he was cleaning up the grill from the previous time he was working, and he still had the screwdriver. … His trial court stated it didn't believe that he was simply acting as a good Samaritan and didn't provide common sense.
25 min of audioOral argument — Melody Kemsley v. Megan Brennan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2020
But we don't want you to exploit it by relying upon something that was not protected under the act. … And it was air for the district court to assume that those complaints had nothing to do with title seven protected characteristics. So I'm real clear.
24 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.