Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.16s
Petition — Illinois v. Washington
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 46 L. Ed. 2d 313, 96 S. … Mosley (1975), 423 U.S. 98, 46 L. Ed. 2d 313, 96 S.
435 U.S. 981Amicus Brief — Carey v. Piphus
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1978
Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976). B. … Hortonville Education Associ- ation, 426 U.S. 482, 496 (1976).
435 U.S. 247Petition — Costle v. Pacific Legal Foundation
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
United States, 402 U.S. 479........ 15 National Independent Coal Operators’ As- sociation v. Kleppe, 423 U.S. 388 .......... 13, 14 Pacific Legal Foundation v. Quarles, 440 F. … Kleppe, 423 U.S. 888, 397-398 (1976).
445 U.S. 198Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 14, 2001
U.S., 452 U.S. 247 (1981), that the definitions of wages for FICA and income tax withholding purposes were the same. … LoBue, 351 U.S. 243 (1956); Commissioner v. Smith, 324 U.S. 177 (1945).
66 FR 57023Treasury DepartmentInternal Revenue ServicePetitioners Reply Brief — Estelle v. Carter
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1983
Parsons, 513 F.2d 264, 267 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 960, 96 S.Ct. 376 (1975). … denied, 423 U.S. 904, 96 S.Ct. 206 (1976). The court has applied only federal constitutional principles where the prosecution has provoked a mistrial, Durrough v.
460 U.S. 1056Respondents Brief — United Mine Workers, Local No. 1854 v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1981
See 417 U.S. at 803-805; American Broad- casting Companies v. Writers Guild of America, West, Ine., 487 U.S. 411, 422-423, 429-481, 435-486 (1978). … See 417 U.S. at 803-805; American Broadcasting Companies v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc., 437 U.S. 411, 422-423, 429-431, 435-436 (1978); S. Rep.
449 U.S. 1110Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2018
Granholm, 544 U.S. at 482 (citing Clark Distilling, 242 U.S. at 324). B. … Q. 474, 482 (1940).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Hopewell v. Dunker
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1995
FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Richard Hopewell Petitioner pro se. 423 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57102 [605]334-0982 i QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. … Richard Hopewell Petitioner pro se. 423 South P ips Avenue Sioux Falls, So.
516 U.S. 965Amicus Curiae Brief — Ohio v. Am. Express Co., 138 S. Ct. 355 (2017) (No. 16-1454)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Kodak, 504 U.S. at 482. … Superior Court Trial Lawyers Ass’n, 493 U.S. 411, 423 (1990).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Twitter, Inc., Petitioner v. Mehier Taamneh, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 5, 2022
Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987) .............................................. 12 Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971) ................................................ 12 Cubby v. CompuServe, 776 F. … Hill, 482 U.S. 451, 453, 466 (1987) (holding that an ordinance “that makes it unlawful to interrupt a police officer in the performance of his or her duties” was unconstitutional, as it “criminalizes a
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 5, 2018
Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 146, 107 S.Ct. 2287 (1987); Tidwell v. … Yuckert, 482 U.S. at 146 n. 5.
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 16, 2009
The purpose of this information collection is to obtain information from applicants and current licensees to further the Commission's goal of protecting U.S. consumers and U.S. carriers from anti-competitive … Due to budgetary constraints, the FCC Form 423-IB has not been implemented yet.
74 FR 53235Federal Communications CommissionJurisdictional Statement — John v. Mississippi
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1978
United States, 228 U.S. 243 (1913) ...... 10 Kennerly v. District Court, 400 U.S. 423 (1971) ..... 13 Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, 187 U.S. 553 (1903) ........ 10 Maynor v. … denied. 421 U.S. 992, 95 S.Ct. 1998, 44 L.Ed.2d 482.
434 U.S. 1032Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998
Bernard, 482 US 89, 100 (2981) ...........50. 10, 11. Vill Hansberry v. Lee, 311 US 32, 45 (1940) ..... ee eee eee 19 Helier v. … The class itself covered over 423 individuals, and countless others "at risk of being placed at Arlington Developmental Center".
525 U.S. 1001Motion for Leave to File — Wisconsin v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Motion for Leave to File · 1940
Atkinson Co., 313 U.S. 508 (1941) ; United States v. Twin City Power. Co., 350 U.S. 222 (195), reh. denied 350 U.S. 1009 (1956); Arizona v. Cali- fornia, 283 US. 423 (1931). … U.S. 470, 482 (1881): ‘‘It would be an abuse of judicial power for the courts to attempt to interfere ...’? Further in. 19 | United States v.
309 U.S. 569Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit v. Lovinger
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
R-482. … Mandell, 525 F.2d 671, 679 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1049 (1976).
488 U.S. 851Opposition Brief — Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1993
Roe, 423 U.S. 1313, (1974) ..........0..4.. 13 Wyrick v. Fields, 459 U.S. 42 (1982) ............ oe Yiu Sine Chun v. … Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656, 665 (1987).
509 U.S. 918Amicus Curiae Brief — May v. Heiner
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1930
Garland, 164 U.S. 1, 11-12 and Steamship Co. v. … Coolidge, 274 U.S. 531, and Untermyer v. Anderson, 276 U. 8S. 440.
281 U.S. 238Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Gordon v. Hunt
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
Supp. 446, 462-463 (S.D.N.Y. 1974), modified on other grounds, 519 F.2d 972 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1018 (1975). … denied, 423 U.S. 1018, 96 S.Ct. 453, 46 L.Ed.2d 389 (1975).
486 U.S. 1008Federal Register · Notice · Jul 3, 2023
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. … Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports during the period of review.
88 FR 42693Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.