Documents

Oral argument — People v. Hauad

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2016

Hauad during an interrogation was given under duress and during a period in which he was coerced and abused. In March of 2014, counsel for Mr. … The defendant in this case has taken isolated comments completely out of context to create a perception of personal bias.

Oral argument — Miramar Capital, LLC v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2026

So the acts and circumstances you're talking about are what motivated Mr. Hefner to make those comments. Correct. And he should have been, you know, I recognize my time is up. … It was a pretty short period of time. I think this all occurred, well, him courting her as a client occurred over several months.

Oral argument — People v. Masters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2020

And I totally understand Judge Adrian's decisions based upon, hey, he's 18 years old, and therefore he's an adult, period. … Yes, they didn't definitively comment that Miller applied in those sections, though.

Oral argument — Guo v. Kamal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 22, 2020

But still, the act of sending her home. There's no question. Three o'clock in the morning, she's told she doesn't have a bleed. She goes home. … Bell's bleed on July 10th was the proximate cause of her death, period. So his failure was the proximate cause of her death, period. So now you're talking about all this stuff later on.

Oral argument — Salvator v. Air and Liquid Systems

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2017

These records are for different time periods, other job sites. They admit that they are all the sales they saw in Illinois. … And like I said, if the court is going to issue a case of first impression, I would ask the court to make it prospective only because I don't think we acted in derogation of established law.

Oral argument — Rivas v. Benny's Prime Chophouse

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2025

I mean, you can get a lot more money in a civil case than you can in a comp act. The family is going to get comp acts. … Industrial Commission, even if you're paid for doing an act, if the act is voluntary, it is not covered by the act. That's why it's important that EGLE was before the amendment.

Oral argument — Doedtman v. Borreggine

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2016

And one final comment on this before I move on to the other issues. What if the shoe were on the other foot? What if we had had evidence or purported evidence that Dr. … But if he's asked about it in his deposition as an attorney and expert, and he lies about it under oath, it's something that's fair game, period.

Oral argument — Gherardini v. Carlyle Community Unit School District 1

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2017

Period. They use length of continuous service. That's the only time it's used. It's the only time it's used. And it's used to define how you order teachers in a RIF situation. … And Your Honor made the comments over time not saying the promises were made, but, in fact, on this record, Mrs. Giardini testified without equivocation that they were made. Mr.

Oral argument — Rhone v. First American Title Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2010

And I'm going to answer that question, I'm also going to answer the broader question of, did First American have notice, period, that this property was underassessed? The answer is no. … Act, under 701. Not known to the company, not recorded in the public records.

Oral argument — Berman v. Napleton's Schaumburg Subaru. Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2026

So the arbitration acts don't have anything to do with why we're here. There was no agreement to arbitrate, period. There was no meeting of the minds. There was no mutual assent. … But I, I, I still, my comment stands that what we have to do in deciding this case is the record. And it's not in the record.

Oral argument — Fay v. Fifty K Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2020

Before we begin, let me make a few comments about our format. Just as if we were in the Elgin Courthouse, you will each be given your regular allotted time. … Um, I disagree with the proposition that there is such a difference in the height levels of those two that they wouldn't act in concert.

Oral argument — People v. Tyler

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2015

Keller, why don't you focus your beginning comments on the denial of moving from a second stage to third stage on the coercion, if you would. … The evidence in the record is that when she met with them at the office the time before, that she met with them for a very long period of time. Right. Why didn't they record it?

Oral argument — Deppa v. Abbott Laboratories

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 31, 2025

But by the time they develop NAC, according to the plaintiffs' claims, the wrongful acts were all over with. Because that's how NAC is made. … What I really think, based on some of his comments, is that he believed Cook County was really capable of handling these cases.

Oral argument — People v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2023

The issue with that is there are thousands and thousands of alerts in that period of time, and people don't disagree. The individual makes the decision. … We're relying on an offhand comment from the state's attorney, just an arrest report. There's clearly a lot of other evidence in this case, witnesses that will testify, body-worn cameras.

Oral argument — Powell v. Dean Foods Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2010

The presumption allows the jury to decide that Christina acted with due care. Whether she acted with sufficient due care is the question that they had to resolve. … Not a lot, but I did want to comment on a couple of things that have been said.

Oral argument — People v. Steeples

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 30, 2018

Frey's opinion, the trial court here wasn't acting as a neutral fact finder at the time he did so. And this is most evident by the way the trial court began the hearing. … So did Judge Schick, in the hearing on the motion for a new trial, comment on the defendant's trial testimony as further support for the fitness finding? I honestly don't recall.