Documents

Oral argument — Pielet v. Pielet

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2010

But the danger there, the inherent danger there is you avoid the purpose of the Survival Act. … And the Survival Act says you've got, okay, a capital law when the corporation dissolved, your cause of action was dead.

Oral argument — People v. Kulpin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2021

He's easily triggered by even mild stressors and perceives them as major events and ruminates on them for an extended period of time. And then we look at the facts of this case. … They're trained professionals to act calm under pressure. If they're acting, if they're yelling, if they're acting in a panic, that defers the purpose of conducting an investigation.

Oral argument — of Fox Creek v. The Village of Campton Hills

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2010

I think you can dispense with the facts, period, and I think we've got a number of issues we really need to discuss, most important of which is your interpretation of the word border. Correct. … It simply is a comment, and he's taking one word from that statute. And by the way, this section, section 5-7-3-1, wasn't enacted in 1936. It came a couple years later. I believe it was 1941.

Oral argument — People v. Sanders

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2012

Because the Post-Conviction Act talks about the balance between finality and the need for finality in our justice system and the need for a just result. … There's nothing that happens in between the time that she's taken out of the car and then brought into the, there's no like stopping for great periods of time.

Oral argument — Board of Education of Meridian Community Unit School District No. 223 v. Property Tax Appeal Board

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 19, 2011

He wouldn't even hit his comments that the income approach was the best, and he didn't even rely on his sales comparison approach. … Bakash's argument that they had a very short period of time because of the order they brought and closed on the property before the order was entered.

Oral argument — Nelson v. Quarles & Brady, LLP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2018

Secondly, the trial court made no finding and didn't comment about whether Gatziolas had a duty to inquire. It just said Gatziolas wasn't aware. We don't know what the trial court thought of that. … I'm waiting for the sun to go so I can get started on that period. All right.

Oral argument — Wagner v. Certain Underwriters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2026

They just acted as if there had not been an increase, even though they had clear evidence that there had been. Okay. … Wagner was going to receive $32,100 for that entire five-year proceeding period.

Oral argument — People v. Crawford

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2013

And the court in that Batson claim just stopped the analysis and said, oh, I find that facially valid, period. And so this court basically said, okay, that's the second step. … I'd like to make a comment on each of the three issues. With respect to Batson, the state concedes in its brief that the third step was not done.

Oral argument — Andrews Advanced Disposal Services Zion Landfill, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2020

And then it sets forth a policy and procedure where plaintiffs can bring successive suits over periods of time to seek damages for those specific sets of time. … They've argued that we are attempting to use the Illinois Farm Act. We're not. That's a statute that has nothing to do with this case.

Oral argument — Di Rito v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 28, 2018

Right, and in the intervening period, they told the Illinois Department of Insurance that they needed to make a 58% increase. … Just two quick points to follow up on Justice Griffin's comments. The plaintiff has not alleged that they were entitled to disclosure of proprietary actuarial data.

Oral argument — People v. Driver

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 24, 2016

So the evidence is that it was a short period of time before the robbery. … In this case, this court commented when they remanded that the jury decision was curious. We don't disagree, but obviously it is not our role and the people can't challenge an acquittal.

Oral argument — Stevens v. Newman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2018

And let me comment on this too. Exhibit 42, months, seven months before the Newmans sold it. … It would have afforded the trial court an opportunity to have acted on that information.

Oral argument — Tuggle, Schiro & Lichtenberger, P.C. v. Country Preferred Insurance Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2015

The liability limits of $100,000 were paid without any litigation promptly and during that time period there was also medical bills that were being incurred by Mr. … So he's never acted in our interest or done anything to benefit whatsoever. And second, you know. Okay, well what position would the insurance company have been in but for the $100,000 settlement?

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Bauman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2014

That was clearly found to be a marital property and the person had to pay it back, but that was not an intentional act. This was clearly intentional. … Do you want to comment on maintenance before you go on?

Oral argument — People v. Lentz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 25, 2011

That's for a reckless act, which is conscious disregard. In this case, it's connected with a videotape statement that is both denied by her at trial as being not truthful and physically impossible. … And that's when she makes the comment about, you know, she's getting bitten by mosquitoes.

Oral argument — Indian Prairie School District v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2011

I thought that Curran also said the primary problem was the severe pain, which causes her to have been able to stand, sit for significant periods of time, et cetera. Did she also say that? … So they commented on why the reading on at least one or two individuals was elevated to 20. And that was found to be because they used lip balm. And the drinking of the beer then you're saying?

Oral argument — Thornton v. Stover

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2011

My assessment of this standards review issue, somebody made the comment it doesn't make a big difference. Frankly, I'm not sure there is. … Is anything other than bound by the agreement, period, the end, without conditions? Well, I'm asking, we see in the Budweiser case there was an admonition given.

Oral argument — 1-17-0500

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020

The appellant will have a short period of time for rebuttal. What we're going to do though, we have three cases up this morning. … That when a defense presents a mental health expert to comment on, you know, whether someone was suggestible or not, that the state then does the same thing and rebutts it with their own expert.

Oral argument — Marriage of Kalebic

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 21, 2024

There were several notices of default sent to him, because that's what triggered his obligation to make good on the payments, and then his failure to do so within a certain time period caused an acceleration … Justice McClain, your comment was, when you were questioning my closing counsel, was quite pertinent. He had to have the opportunity to come in with his evidence and cross-examine.

Oral argument — Miramar Capital, LLC v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2026

So the acts and circumstances you're talking about are what motivated Mr. Hefner to make those comments. Correct. And he should have been, you know, I recognize my time is up. … It was a pretty short period of time. I think this all occurred, well, him courting her as a client occurred over several months.