Documents

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Clark

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2019

have to show that she was under legal disability No pleadings even said Duress There was no specific allegations as to Duress or fraudulent concealment And that's the only way To get beyond the 2 year period … Thank you very much So Closing comments? Yes Okay Equitable?

Oral argument — McGhee v. Annucci

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2024

The people first, the first error is that the people suppressed for a period of years the existence of a second eyewitness, as well as a statement taken from that eyewitness. … Tewitt testified about how her husband and petitioner discussed a gun that her husband was cleaning at that time, and petitioner described how the husband needed to clean the gun in order to avoid leaving

Oral argument — United States v. Ted Severeid

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2015

And again, in the context of this argument, that one comment is not a problem. … If there had been an objection, this is the kind of comment that could have been easily curated.

Oral argument — United States v. Jesus Buzo-Zepeda

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2010

And there we have comment 2, which we've already talked about. … So if I take comment 2, and I add that to 4A1.2K1, I'm left with, on the first, he was given a period of imprisonment, and whether he served at all or not, if he served any one day, I have to give it on

Oral argument — United States v. WARD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2006

The Court THE COURT He assumed it was the government was acting in good faith. MR. SCHAFFLER That's right. THE COURT Okay. MR. … He's not a clean, perfect person. I understand that.

Oral argument — United States v. Ricky Artis

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2025

This was not a vindictive act. … So this is absolutely on plein air review.

Oral argument — ARKEMA v. HONEYWELL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2012

Because it's an act of indirect infringement. Ah, but don't you have to show a direct infringement before you can find an act of indirect infringement? … The only actions that actually were alleged are samples in 2009, period.

Oral argument — Luxton v. Washington State Department of Veterans Affairs

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2026

David Luxton, who's also a major in the Air Guard and the Civil Air Patrol. … Well, you act as if the July version might not be the, I mean, isn't that what we looked at? Well, we're talking about reasonable accommodations too, your honor. Okay.

Oral argument — United States v. Bennie Overton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2014

picture because because if I don't introduce the evidence the jury will infer that my client was lying not that to corroborate his his testimony his response and that's where I say the court gave some good comments … argument because if it wasn't presented to the district court it's not right to reverse the district court unless plain-air shown we don't know that the the defense counsel wouldn't have attempted to

Oral argument — Ancala Holdings v. Price

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2006

In other words, if I go into the country club today with guests and I sit down in the restaurant and I get really bad service and I see a cockroach running along the baseboard and I comment to my companions … I come back, the service is good, the restaurant is clean, the food's terrific. But the record doesn't support that. Well, it supports that in 1994 we had this complaint.

Oral argument — Ayo v. Quintero

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2024

But just still commenting on the procedure, following that order, it was something of a catch-22, right? … Bessie's acts of hunting, in other words, they were able to allege Mr. Hunt or Mr.

Oral argument — Fogel v. Vega

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2018

It does, except for the people who bought the stock in the class period based on the minimum drops out when the cover-up is exposed. … They have a chance to come clean right then in October, but they don't. They wait until an article comes out in April and the stock drops and then they say, oh, mea culpa, we did it. Okay.

Oral argument — Shannon Saevik v. Swedish Medical Center

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2022

Some of those, those comments, and then also the comment that she'd been habitually problematic and a drain on resources. … I mean, those, the comments are what they are. Right.

Oral argument — Lorenzo Mendoza Martinez v. Avions de Transport Regional

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2014

vice president and he he was a vice president he was a vice president actively doing business and it's the same thing in Burnham your honor the defendant in Burnham was just in California for a brief period … And to comment very clearly that with general jurisdiction, it still requires evidence of in-state presence at home in the forum. And here, we don't have that.

Oral argument — Salomon v. Kroenke Sports & Entmt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2021

Before that date, on April 16, 2013, the significance of that date is it was the day after the exclusivity period expired. … So obviously the fact itself is evidence that there was, um, a precludence of the country and, and, and a, uh, an act of, of the intentionally left him off that stage.

Oral argument — Heidi Eastus v. ISS Facility Services, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

Act. … I mentioned a couple of minutes or a few seconds ago about the Railway Labor Act. That act was in place at the time of the enactment of the Federal Arbitration Act.

Oral argument — Joel Stevens v. Administrator FAA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2020

Air Surgeon was it's revoked. … And now, because he did that, we don't really have the Administrative Procedure Act right to, or these other acts, to a hearing with a judge. Why did he not respond to the October 10th letter?

Oral argument — United States v. Kevin Trudeau

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 24, 2015

I mean, it's a little ñ it's not clean. It's not clean, but that is what occurred. … So the only time period at issue is when this was a misdemeanor charge and the act did not apply.

Oral argument — JACOBS VEHICLE v. PACIFIC DIESEL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2013

Do we need at least a sentence that says, no secondary considerations because no nexus, period? No. … If the fourth and bottom doesn't work because the cam doesn't lift or it doesn't act without, Seiko specifically says, you can use the J brake. Now, Halfbrake argues it teaches away. We disagree.

Oral argument — Fredric Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2021

Auerbach had received compensation in a three-year period that was valued at $52 million that is in the stipulation. … It's not just looking on the internet, period. And a particular knowledge that they would be...