Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.90s
Opposition Brief — Technograph, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1985
Computing Scale Co., 261 U.S. 399 (1923), is to the same effect. … Petition pp. 21-24. CONCLUSION The petition should be denied. Respectfully submitted, ARTHUR G. CONNOLLY ARTHUR G.
474 U.S. 819Reply Brief — Yee v. Escondido
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992
Brief for Respondent at 24. In other words, they buy the rights created by the Ordinance. ! … December 24, 1991); Yee v.
503 U.S. 519Petition for Writ of Certiorari — James Phillips, Petitioner v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 20, 2017
Enis, 194 111. 2d 361, 399-400 (2001). … Very truly yours, Clerk of the Supreme Court 24
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Steven Vicario, Petitioner v. Ohio
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 24, 2026
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 6 (1970), quoting 5 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 1367, p. 29 (3d ed.1940). Two distinct lines of confrontation authority have emerged. … Roberts, 118 Ohio St.3d 236 ¶ 136 (2025), citing Chapman, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Maine v. Moulton
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Quarles, No. 82-1213 (June 12, 1984)... 19, 24 Nix v. Williams, No. 82-1651 (June 11, 1984) ......6, 13, 14, 16, 17, 20, 29 Powell v. … Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) (preliminary hearing) ; White v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 59 (1963) (guilty plea at preliminary hearing).
474 U.S. 159Amicus Curiae Brief — Walton v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Battiste, 24 F.Cas. 1042 (C.C.D. a ee ee 6 Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970) ................ 4 Williams v. New York, 337 U.S. 241 (1949)............ 13 Woodson v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78, 86-87 (1970); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. at 151-154.
497 U.S. 639Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mark Norris, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jul 2, 2020
Code Ann. § 39-14-402……………………………….………5, 21-22, 24, 25 vii Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-403…………………………..…...……………….4, 5, 22 Tex. … Ct. 399; and Quarles v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 1872 (2019), and the cases they rely upon. Rules of the Supreme Court 10(c).
Opposition Brief — Ross v. Reda
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1975
George, 399 US 224, 229 (1970) Nelson v. Moore, 470 F 2d 1192 (1st Cir 1972) Parker v, Parker, 97 So. 2d 136 (DCt set Fla. 1957) People of the State of New York v. … See Darr v Burford, supra, at 203, 94 L Ed at 766; Davis v Burke, 179 US 399, 401-403, 45 L Ed 249, 250, 251. 21S Ct 210 (1900).
423 U.S. 892Amicus Curiae Brief — National Ass'n of Broadcasters v. Quincy Cable TV, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986
Sept. 24, 1985)......... Black Hills Video Corp. v. FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. sb ..) PP Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp, __— U.S. S. … Sept. 24, 1985).
476 U.S. 1169Memorandum — Kenney v. Wabash Railroad
Supreme Court brief · Memorandum · 1953
Heth (1806) 3 Cranch, 399, 413, 2 Pe ee een ur re eee 14 U. S. v. Hughes, D.C., N.Y. (1875) 8 Ben. 29, 26 Fed. … E. 2d 713, 311 Mass. 185; Mulligan vr, Hilton (1940) 24 N. E. 2d 676, 679, 133 A. L. R. 376: Duff +. Black Diamond Collieries (1930) 33 S. W. 24 63, 161 Tenn. 486; Carder Realty Corporation 1.
344 U.S. 913Opposition Brief — Louis v. Commissioner
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000
Gov't Br. 3 n.2, 24-26. … Mitchell, 303 U.S. at 399.
528 U.S. 1115Amicus Curiae Brief — Randall Mathena, Warden, Petitioner v. Lee Boyd Malvo
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 18, 2019
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989) .............................. 17, 24 United States v. … Ct. 399, 407 (2018) (“[W]e are a court of review, not of first view.”)
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arnold v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
Green, 399 U.S.149 (1970) .. 2.2... 6 Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74 (1970) ........... 7 Haggins v. … Mil.R.Evid. 803(24).
484 U.S. 1060Respondents Brief — Crane v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1986
at 21-24; United States v. Hasting, 461 U. 8. 499, 508- 509 (1983). … Maroney, 399 U. 8. 42, 52-53 (1970) (admission of evidence obtained in violation of Fourth Amendment) ; Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.
476 U.S. 683Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Colby Todd Dubose, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 16, 2023
Ct. 399, 406-07 (2019). … Ct. 399 (2019), Mr. Dubose's ACCA sentence remained valid. ECF 51. 4 Mr.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Aakash A. Dalal, Petitioner v. New Jersey
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 14, 2022
Pennsylvania. 382 U.S. 399 (1966)................................................:........... 28 Grayned v. … The Federalist No. 78, Bantam Classic Ed. at 399 (A.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 31, 2020
Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc., 529 U.S. 1 (2000) .............................................24 Sims v. … ‘Such a system must be fair—and it must work.’ ” 402 U.S. at 399.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortg. Corp., 136 S. Ct. 289 (2015) (No. 14-1055)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Rev. 399 e. ee 26 Mosk, Stanley, State Constitutionalism: Both Liberal and Conservative, 63 Tex. L. … Rev. 399 (2010).
Petition — DAVID L. FUNCHESS v. FLORIDA (No. 81-5329)
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981
State, 399 So.2d 356 (Fla. 1981), and is set forth in Appendix D. The motion for rehearing and the denial thereof are set forth in Appendix E. … Fla. 357 Cite as, Fla. 399 So.26 357 death are appropriate for Funchess.
Opposition — Alma Society, Inc. v. Mellon
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
.¥.8. 24 835 (Surr. Ct., 1975) Jones v. Mayer Co.,392 U.S. 409(1968) Page 17 19 16,17 16 21 20 20 14,16 In The Page SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Palmer v. … Ct. 1975) (good cause not shown); In Re Anonymous, 92 Misc. 2d 224, 399 N.Y.S. 2d 857 (Surr.
444 U.S. 995
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.