Documents

Oral argument — Rivera v. Board of Trustees of the Bolingbrook Police Pension Fund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2015

Wasn't his opinion in fairness, Your Honor, based upon the record that reported a period of complaints every six months prior to that report by another physician, am I correct? … Conestra comments on it in his report, and he's providing the initial reports at the same time as the other two pension board doctors. As I was getting to, Dr.

Oral argument — People v. Strong

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 21, 2011

Which raises a specific question, and I apologize for taking you off track, but if police working on this for six years, maybe not every single day, but over a period of time, could not identify this person … There was a point in time when the Post-Conviction Act was not clear about what judge should hear post-conviction petitions. Now it is clear.

Oral argument — First Bank v. Unique Marble & Granite Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2010

I am going to act as an assignee for the benefit of all creditors here. Do you have an objection to that? You sit silent. … Do you have any final comment that you want to leave us with?

Oral argument — Hunt v. Heerod

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2018

We don't believe that that's what the work comp act says. … Obviously, the employer had an opportunity at the eventual hearing to comment on that. We did, in this case, hold them responsible in testimony.

Oral argument — U.S. Bank, National Ass'n v. Lovitsch

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2026

And the official comment to section 3309 states, the right state are those of a person entitled to enforce the instrument at the time of loss, rather than those of an owner in former section 3804. … But they have the servicer sending the notice, which sometimes the servicer is bound by Fair Debt Collections Practices Act.

Oral argument — People v. Henderson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2014

We don't actually have him saying he didn't have anything to do with the shooting act. What do you need for the gist of a constitutional point? You need an arguable basis in fact or law. Okay. … What about the comment that Phillips makes in his affidavit, that he doesn't wish to discuss this any further, or words to that effect, he says?

Oral argument — Jack's Specialized Services v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2013

Once he did that, you have no decision, period. Judge, the problem with that language that you just read... Justice, excuse me. … And that has not been acted on. What about Dr. Sweeney's? Dr.

Oral argument — People v. Daniels

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2021

Any comments on those lines at all that indicated she reviewed the trial court proceedings? And not that I am aware. No. Okay. All right. Thank you. I have no further questions. … That's when an attorney who's appointed after the 90-day default provision of the act finds herself representing a client whose pro se petition advances an argument that's unequivocally without merit or

Oral argument — Archford Capital Strategies, LLC. v. Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2022

But part of that too was, under the agreement between Archford and Davis, it was like a sliding scale or a sliding amount over the period of time that would have to be paid back if a client transferred … I was really directing my comments a little bit towards Judge Bowie. Judge Bowie, you were talking about the benefit of the bargain earlier when Mr. Green was talking.

Oral argument — Carle Foundation v. Cunningham Township

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2015

Did you cite the Act itself? Yes, it's the Declaratory Relief Act, which is found in Section 2-701 of the Code of Civil Procedure. … It is in the Declaratory Relief Act. So the Declaratory Relief Act expressly contemplates exactly what we did here.

Oral argument — Greenhill v. REIT Management & Research, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2019

I certainly have been paying attention to the Court's comments, and I would like to address some of the issues that have been raised. … So, and then… Is that actually responsible for the acts of your employees?

Oral argument — People v. Murphy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 27, 2016

I'm saying that they should have gone in, period. But the danger that was created was created by them. They created the emergency. … They just acted on what they heard over a radio. That's correct.

Oral argument — Estate of Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2016

Just from the point of view of the missing witnesses, this is a brief comment. … It was chaotic, which showed that they didn't know what they were doing, and they were acting indifferently.

Oral argument — National Rifle and Pistol Academy, LLC v. EFN Brookshire Property, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2020

I don't believe she specifically addressed that in her comments. I do not. I believe they overlap. Do I? Yeah. I believe they're different. … Within a due diligence period, the parties were to engage in good faith negotiation for a lease back to defendant for parking spaces. That's paragraph 11. That didn't happen.

Oral argument — People v. Nelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2024

The trial court's comment about the video where the detention officer or corrections officer told him, don't do something stupid like pick your nose, and then he looks at the camera and then finally picks … Nelson came around, the state enlisted testimony that, yes, he was acting weird and people were put off by it. He was looking into the windows. People were concerned.

Oral argument — People v. Huffman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2010

You can make some comments on that unless there is some objection. You can make your comments on the defendant's appeal too. You may proceed. Thank you. May it please the court. … They quote, Had Petitioner known the potential sentence, or that he was subject to an extended term sentence, or that he was subject to a period of mandatory supervisory release, he would not have pleaded

Oral argument — People v. Le Mirage, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 28, 2011

And that misled them into thinking that they could consider the acts of the corporation independently of the acts of the individuals. The jury asked to look at those contracts during deliberations. … That's an important fact, because it shows the jury was drilling in and looking at the key issue that confused them, which was the corporate acts and the personal acts of either Wayne.

Oral argument — People v. Mobley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023

This court upheld this section of gun and upheld the constitutionality of Illinois' Floyd firearm owner's identification card acts and concealed carry license acts. … So this idea that somehow, just because Illinois has a concealed carry act or has a FOIA act, that, well, Bruin's off the table.

Oral argument — Alaron Trading Corp. v. Hehmeyer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2015

And then when they had to sign this because their capital, they could no longer accept comments, they were forced to sign this. So they were two completely different provisions. … The complaint says on page two that you're seeking damages for $4 million from Haymeier for his misrepresentation, fraudulent omissions, and other wrongful acts that he committed during the period of what

Oral argument — Turmusaya Jewelry, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 18, 2019

So these are conditions based on a certain period of time in which the insured is either operating, closed. … But that part of the Surplus Lines Act doesn't apply to the insurer.