Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.10s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Schacht, _— U.S. — , 104 S.Ct. 508 (1983) 7 Seawell v. Miller Brewing Co., 576 F. Supp. 245 (M.D.N.C. 1981) ..... | 21 Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 741 F. 2d 482 (2d Cir. … Imrex Co., 741 F.2d 482 at 494 (2d Cir. 1984)....
469 U.S. 1157Amicus Curiae Brief — Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
U.S. 483 (1954) Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000) City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989) Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co., 424 U.S. 747 (1976) Fullilove v. … L.J. 423 (1996).
534 U.S. 103Amicus Curiae Brief — Priscilla Villarreal, Petitioner v. Isidro R. Alaniz, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 23, 2024
Hendrix, 423 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2005) .......................... 7, 8 City of Tahlequah v. Bond, 595 U.S. 9 (2021) .................................................. 12 Crouse v. … Hendrix, for example, plaintiffs alleged that defendant police officers carried out a campaign of police harassment and retaliation after plaintiffs supported a county referendum opposed by the sheriff. 423
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 19, 2020
United States, 423 U.S. 212 (1976) ...................................................7 Carr v. U.S., 560 U.S. 438 (2010) ........................................... 7, 8, 9 Griffin v. … United States, 423 U.S. 212, 216 (1976) (observing that Congress used the present perfect tense to “denot[e] an act that has been completed.”)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Roy Sargeant, Petitioner v. Aracelie Barfield
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 19, 2024
Boule, 596 U.S. 482 (2022) ...................................... 3, 4, 12 Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982) .............................................. 14 Hernandez v. … Boule, 596 U.S. 482, 494, 496 (2022) (“[W]e reaffirm that a Bivens cause of action may not lie where, as here, national security is at issue.”); Hernandez v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rose Mary Knick, Petitioner v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 4, 2017
Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987) ............................................. 14 v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (cont.) Page(s) Forseth v. … Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), did this Court even decide that monetary compensation was the self-effecting remedy required by the Takings Clause.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987)), is it permissible for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to hold—as a matter of law—that a temporary moratorium can never require constitutional compensation … County of Los 10 Angeles, 482 U.S. 304, 318 (1987), this Court acknowledged that temporary takings denying all use of property “are not different in kind from permanent takings, for which the Constitution
535 U.S. 302Amicus Curiae Brief — Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
United States, 318 U.S. 423 (1943).... 11 McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Commission, 411 U.S. 166 (1973)... ccvcvccvicsdcsrenenuann 10, 11, 20, 21 New Mexico v. … United States, 318 U.S. 423, 431-32 (1943); Choate v. Trapp, 224 U.S. 665, 675 (1912). ~ 3) MeClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Commission, 411 U.S. 164, 174 (1973); Winters v.
520 U.S. 43Amicus Curiae Brief — OTO, L.L.C., Petitioner v. Ken Kho, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 14, 2020
Thomas, 482 U.S. 483 (1987) ....................................... 9, 10 Preston v. Ferrer, 552 U.S. 346 (2008) ............................................. 9 Oce Bus. Servs., Inc. v. … Thomas, 482 U.S. 483, 491 (1987) (holding that “[t]he oblique reference to the Federal Arbitration Act in footnote 15 of [the precedent relied on by the California Court of Appeal] cannot fairly be read
Amicus Curiae Brief — Golden Gate Restaurant Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2010
Coyne, 482 U.S. 1 (1987) oo... ccc cccccccccceceescccceceveeueeucueess 19-21 Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. … See, e.g., Coyne, 482 U.S. at 9.
561 U.S. 1024Amicus Curiae Brief — Rose Mary Knick, Petitioner v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 6, 2018
Los Angeles Cty., Cal., 482 U.S. 304 (1987) .......................................................................13 iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES – Continued Page Franchise Tax Bd. of State of Cal. v. … Los Angeles Cty., Cal., 482 U.S. 304, 315 (1987).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Dutra Grp. v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 627 (2018) (No. 18-266)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018
U.S, Conat, art. IIL, $2. … Jd. at 423 (quoting Peterson, 278 U.S. at 138-139) (alteration in original). Stated another way, “both the Jones Act and the and also one of the other two.”
Amicus Curiae Brief — Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
denied, 126 S.Ct. 423 (2005)... ceceeeceeeeeeees Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957)........... cece Ex Parte Peterson, 253 U.S. 300 (1920)......... indie Group Life & Health Ins. Co. v. … U.S. Const. amend. VII.
551 U.S. 308Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Tellez
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Supp. 423 (S.D. Cal. 1985) ooo.ccccccccccccscee. 8 Gregory v. Simon Brothers, Inc. 640 F. Supp. 1252 (N.D. Ind. 1986) .0.000.00.......... 8 Hasten v. … Supp. 423, 427 (S.D.
484 U.S. 908Amicus Curiae Brief — Janus v. Am. Fed'n, 138 S. Ct. 54 (2017) (No. 16-1466)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017
Shewry, 423 F.3d 906 (9th Cir. 2005). Railway Employees’ Department v. Hanson, 351 U.S. 225 (1956) United States v. United Foods, Inc., 1 Vasquez v. … Shewry, 423 F.3d 906, 917 (9th Cir. 2005) (discussing “the rationale of the Abood and Keller line of cases”); Gerawan Farming, Inc. v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Ford Motor Motor Co. v. Buell-Wilson (No. 09-297)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Danaher, 238 U.S. 482 (1915)....... ee ee oe 1] MISCELLANEOUS go ace 4 WE Eon fae Ey 8 ES. : Se ne 6 Steven Garber, Punitive Damages and Deter- rence of Effictency-Promoting Analysis: A Problem … Danaher, 238 U.S. 482, 490 (1915).
Amicus Curiae Brief — New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. City of New Orleans
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Garden State Bar Association, 457 U.S. 423 (1982) iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Page Middle South Energy, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service Commission, 593 F. Supp. 363 (E.D. … Garden State Bar Ass’n, 457 U.S. 423, 432-34 (1982) ; Ohio Civil Rights Comm’n v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc. —— U.S. ——, 106 S. Ct. 2718, 2723 (1986) (“Ohio Commission’).
481 U.S. 1023Amicus Curiae Brief — Gonzales v. Oregon
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Moore, 423 (28. 122 (1978) .......cccccscccsovscsssceseveseeees 3 Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997) .........ccecceseeseeeeeeeeeeeeees 1 Washington v. … In U.S. v. Moore, this Court implied that the proper standard to utilize in best enforcing the intent of the CSA is a national standard. See generally U.S. v. Moore, 423 U.S. 122 (1975).
546 U.S. 243Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma, Petitioner v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 18, 2024
Raich, 545 U.S. at 66 (Thomas, J., dissenting) (quoting McCulloch, 17 U.S. at 423) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Maryland, 17 U.S. 17 U.S. 316, 421 (1819).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 1, 2020
Coyne, 482 U.S. 1, 9 (1987). … Egelhoff, 532 U.S. at 148 (quoting Fort Halifax, 482 U.S. at 9).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.