Documents

Oral argument — City of Mascoutah v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2024

It is respondent's witness's testimony that before they got to addressing cleaning of the pool, they addressed the pool rules, including the rule against backdives. … So the commission found that the act of getting in a pool during a work break to cool off and have fun with coworkers is an act of personal comfort.

Oral argument — North MS Med Ctr v. Quartiz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2024

Now, he tried to clean that up when his lawyer asked him some questions about it, but that's what the facts are, right? The facts are, they've said to the court, we can't remove it. … Um, and for that reason, both their, uh, Defend Trade Secrets Act claims, um, and any reliance on, and their Mississippi Trade Secrets Act claims should fail.

Oral argument — Toll Brothers, Inc. v. Chang Lin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2010

The judge does make comments about that the judge feels that in some way that-is it Mr. Toll? Is that how we say it, or Toll? Toll Brothers. Toll. … So at some point, it's true there was an indefinite period of time for removal of the easement, but it was, in fact, temporary.

Oral argument — Andrew Davis v. Wayne Carpenter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2015

Well, just very briefly on that, there's no doubt that they labored under that assumption for some period of time, and the one or two people that Mr. … This is just as clean a case, as clean a record of this as I've seen. On the prejudice side, yes. On the performance, not so much.

Oral argument — United States v. $472,871.95 in Funds Seized

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2018

I believe there were a handful of buys over a very short time period of controlled substance analogs. Controlled substance analog, as Your Honors know, is like a controlled substance. … That can consist of a business or clean money in a bank account that helps clean the dirty money.

Oral argument — Daretha Braziel v. Gretchen Whitmer

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024

If he said that and didn't act with deliberate indifference, I wouldn't say that would be a constitutional violation. It would just be negligence. It would just be negligence, Your Honor. … You can't just say we repeatedly lied to the public for a period of three years. When did we lie? Who did we lie to?

Oral argument — Doolinv.Kasin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 22, 2010

But if the statute says the Clean Water Act cases, that's a little bit different. The statute's not the same. Correct. … For a while there was an issue about whether or not it could be equitably told in a one-year period under the statutory one-year period of filing a habeas under EDPA.

Oral argument — Crummel v. Cambra

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2003

I believe outside of Frazier there was just one commentator that maybe agreed with the dissent's position. … And I agree that the court said, made the comment we have not spoken decisively. You want to sign your name for an opinion?

Oral argument — MacLean v. Homeland Security

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2008

But when it's sensitive security information governed by regulation, the Whistleblower Protection Act says he has the right to disclose that. … The statute says TSA determines whether this was SSI, period. After TSA determines that, court of appeals reviews it.

Oral argument — David Payne v. Benteler Automotive Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2022

I'm claiming he was an average employee who had a very good attendance record, kept his nose clean. … And more than that, he's including counselings that happened both before the decisional time period and after.

Oral argument — SaurikIT, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2023

The law is equally clear that acts of enforcement during the limitations period are overt acts that are sufficient for a continuing violation. … And that is an overt act within the limitations period that's causing injury by that very act.

Oral argument — Aviation Suppliers Association v. Michael Huerta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2017

I wish the notice had gone through notice and comment so that we could have actually pointed out to the FAA that the notice isn't getting us to an end point that we need to be at. … I wish the system was as clean as you had just described it. I'm asking how you understand the requirement. All right? When do you think they have to have—a broken engine has come in.

Oral argument — Northrop GrummanCorpv.AxisReinsuranceCo.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

That doesn't mean necessarily that the wrongful acts complained of in the Marshall class period are somehow not related to the wrongful acts in Graybeck. … With my colleague's indulgence, I have a couple of things to clean up. One of them is, so let's talk about how the tower works.

Oral argument — Gatubhai Mistry v. Qualcomm, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2021

But having addressed those subjects, you know, having broached the subject, they were under a duty to come clean. This court has said so in many, many cases. … Counsel said, nothing in the complaint shows that we didn't act in good faith, especially on February 26th.

Oral argument — Advanced Microtherm, Inc. v. Norman Wright Mechanical Equip

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2013

He said under no circuit, he would always take the lowest price, period. … Under both Sherman Act and the Cartwright Act. Sure.

Oral argument — Energy Coal S P A v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 1, 2016

Repairing the consequences of injurious acts, I don't see where that comes in. And then there were two other factors that the Court listed. … And when the newspapers queried her chief of staff, it was all in Politico.com, the chief of staff of that There's a period in that sentence. Lots of semicolons, so we need a period. All right.

Oral argument — Recreational Developments v. City of Phoenix

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2003

Constitution guarantees the right to offer a live sex act for entertainment. … And so no matter what Gould and Scherzer say, they're still stuck with the fact that they don't have a right of privacy that protects the operation of a live sex act business offering live sex acts as

Oral argument — Board of Trustees of Riverdale Police v. Village of Riverdale

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2014

And he could not comment whether there was financial damage here or not. Our expert witnesses indicated that there was financial damage to the fund. … But the legislature has, at least twice now, continued the period of when the pension funds have to be fully funded.

Oral argument — Maksym & McMahon v. Board of Elections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2011

The chairman of the board at the conclusion of that hearing made some other comments that I think are appropriate here. … my residence is in Rockford, but for that temporary period I resided in Chicago?

Oral argument — Minasyan v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2006

If it's a glaring act, which everybody recognizes is improper, then you don't even need to comply with Lusada. That's Lee v. Ashcroft. … And this was merely a procedural way to clean up the problem created by the two names and two A numbers. Kagan.