Documents

Oral argument — Doe 1, Doe 2, & Doe 3 v. St. Leonard's Ministeries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 21, 2017

The provision was projected on a screen in front of the jurors for a period of minutes, not seconds. And the existence of the transcript of the colloquy in the court's chambers proves that. … These were the basis of the negligent acts that this jury weighed and decided in deciding this verdict in favor of these plaintiffs.

Oral argument — People v. Banta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2021

The state never presented any evidence of affirmative consent, period, or any way to show that such consent could be voluntarily given after an unlawful detention and search. … His comment was, I'm cool if. I'm cool if another officer takes over. Yes, which means I will not fight you. It could reasonably be construed as I will not fight you. And as we see in People v.

Oral argument — People v. Shaw

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023

His complete version of what he believed, what he thought, how he acted, explained every single one of his actions. … I think the judge, I mean, that was the ultimate, uh, uh, result is that he, he acted on his unreasonable or, uh, stake in belief.

Oral argument — Oettie v. Guthrie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2020

Meg's comment that we have enough laws in the election code that would prohibit the kind of conduct you're talking about without stepping on someone's First Amendment rights? Right. … By the text of the statute that says, quote, state law prohibits voters from taking photographs with their completed ballot, period, close quote.

Oral argument — Knoob Enterprises v. Illinois Liquor Control Comm.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2011

It doesn't matter if you act yes or yes. It happened. It happened on your premises. You're guilty. And you're liable. … A letter of recommend a fine of not more than $1,000 for first violation and not more than $1,500 for a second violation within 12 months period and not more than $2,500.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Armstrong

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2012

Armstrong throughout the entire period, they're substantially less than used by the court. … The fact that there were rules to show cause issues, and that Judge Olson commented on the obstructive nature of Mr.

Oral argument — Country Mutual Insurance v. Higgins Green & White Landscaping, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 16, 2010

The transportation of the children in the van was legitimate purpose, but the deserting of a small child for an extended period of time was not. … Because that case involved, and the logic of that, the child doing that in the supervision, that's where they went to the intervening act, whether there was an intervening act.

Oral argument — People v. Cox

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2013

It's incumbent, both under Strickland and under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, for a defendant to present enough information to support the claim. … Justice Jorgensen, you had asked or commented about the affidavit and the alibi, and I think I misunderstood when you originally asked with respect to the affidavit.

Oral argument — People v. Strickland

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2019

She didn't act as a lookout. She did not act away as a getaway driver. As this court pointed out, perhaps she was a getaway passenger. That does not make her accountable. … You're only contesting the locational evidence of where the phones were at certain periods of time. Correct.

Oral argument — Longanecker v. East Moline School District No. 37

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2016

plaintiff in this case is asking you to do However, in 2011, the state legislature heavily revised the statute for tenured teacher terminations under the Illinois school code The amendments were based on the comments … Longenecker testifying and she admitted this, sending these emails over the period of time in which she claimed that she was walking these students down the hallway So the hearing officer failed to take

Oral argument — Newsome v. Abbott

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2010

It was a period of three weeks that she went to jail, and during that time, Victor cared for Alex until he bailed her out. … that exclusively focus on acts of omission, and, in fact, in the statute it says acts of commission or acts of omission, but he seemed to discount that.

Oral argument — Rivera v. Board of Trustees of the Bolingbrook Police Pension Fund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2015

Wasn't his opinion in fairness, Your Honor, based upon the record that reported a period of complaints every six months prior to that report by another physician, am I correct? … Conestra comments on it in his report, and he's providing the initial reports at the same time as the other two pension board doctors. As I was getting to, Dr.

Oral argument — People v. Gaston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2024

So in order to determine what effect Addison has on this case, this court must determine whether post-conviction counsel acted unreasonably. … Even before that, our argument first is that the counsel has no duty to add claims, period. But then, in addition to that, he certainly doesn't have a duty to add a merit to this claim.

Oral argument — People v. Coleman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2022

It's, yeah, I'm not sure how clear that videotape was I mean it was fuzzy I mean granted it all occurred within a very quick period of time, but it's also the, you know, subjective standard, generally … Oh, Your Honor, I'm sorry, my, my point was to go to Jessica McLaren's comment about Walker hypothetically not being liable for the shooting.

Oral argument — BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Joe Contarino, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

Your argument makes a lot of sense under the common law, but does 31.5 of the conveyances act change that at all? … And their own comments mention that we are codifying the common law.

Oral argument — GF Judgements LLC v. Estate of Evgeny Freidman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2026

In the biometric privacy cases, it was anybody aggrieved by a violation of the act can bring a suit. … They were made about the same time period, but Sterling Bank did not have a judgment against... It wasn't mentioned if they did. Sterling Bank did not have a judgment against Mr.

Oral argument — In re: Estate Isringhausen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 18, 2015

The antinuptial property agreement, as well as the limitations period. Mr. Mawson's gone into a great deal of argument about ambiguity. … I'm just very briefly going to add a couple of comments in addition to what Allison Lorden just said. I would point to 735 section 52-616.

Oral argument — People v. McKee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2022

admonished, really runs counter to the purpose of the rule and it puts the onus and the burden on the defendant to know enough that he should have been properly admonished in order to object during the period … The judge did not comment on the nature of the charge, merely saying the charge was criminal trespass to land and obstructing a peace officer.

Oral argument — Marriage of Weeks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2025

No diligence, period, and then goes on to determine unconscionability. … We all seem to be acting as if unreasonably favorable terms to one party is the only decision that has to be made here, and that's not the case.

Oral argument — Smith v. Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

She commented that she could only make an opinion as to the day she saw her. No doctor, Dr. Salazar, who fed her the medication, and as soon as she came off that medication, she was another person. … So I don't think the time period is particularly relevant. Yes, she got better.