Documents

Oral argument — Elizabeth Powell v. Sherman Hatcher

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010

The Court noted that, you know, how she had, at least to a certain extent, cleaned up her act by not having meth available, methamphetamine available to her. … Now, let's see, with respect to the do-you-too comment by Mr. Leavitt, once again, let's assume that you take that away. You still have her other admissions. You still have Mr. Berkman's testimony.

Oral argument — United States v. Kelvin Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2019

And the third is the court aired in accepting his waiver of his right to a jury trial. … Well, I would say that goes to the La La Land comment. This is all speculation that these officers did anything. In fact, it's just the defendants.

Oral argument — George Lutfi v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2013

Briefly, the appellant was injured while at the United States Air Force Memorial in 2006. … That's a whole, that's a lot of people traipsed in through the dark over the two-week period.

Oral argument — Hanson v. Dragovich

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2010

Tom Hansen and his hands were clean. … Your Honors, this was not a gratuitous comment by Trooper Brown.

Oral argument — United States v. Meza Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2005

Yes, but I think 640 and the way that the guidelines were promulgated and issued became the force of law during that period of time. Your time's up. We'll hear from the government. Okay. Thank you. … So it's a little bit difficult to put this burden on him, knowing his intellectual makeup and the fact that he had said he'd come clean a number of times and the judge said, yes, I've got these other concerns

Oral argument — Advanced Physicians v. Clifton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2011

It was not out of thin air... What we have here basically... Is a situation... It seems to me... And correct me if I'm wrong... That we have the trial court saying that... The physicians are... … I mean, it wasn't like he was going to go call clean that day. They were busy. He was doubled up. That's correct. That's not a reflection on the trial judge at all.

Oral argument — Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2017

That's a little bit of time whether from the comments to Rule 41B that that seven-day claim period is important. … The comments, the 2002 comments, stress that the lady issued is to mandate nine days or more. The process is human-oriented procedures. I don't see how that could apply.

Oral argument — Corey Weidner v. Jeri Taylor

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2018

She had a duty to act. And so the timing, in fact, was right for Mr. Weidner. … Appeals, the Court could reconsider it as plain air.

Oral argument — 1-20-0205

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2021

And it wasn't brought as a separate act. … Did Judge Hall comment on that at all? She commented on two things. She commented on Jeff Lyon, who I'm sorry to say sadly passed away in early December from some illnesses.

Oral argument — Guest v. City of New York

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2018

I mean, there's no dispute that they gave an order to clear the park in order to clean it. … Not as to the basis of the knowledge, but the acts attributable to your clients. Do you assert that those acts were made up? Like I said. Fabricated.

Oral argument — Council Tree Comm v. FCC

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 23, 2007

Happy to call it an unjust enrichment period if you'd like. … The effect would be… You would still throw it up in the air, right?

Oral argument — Aviation Suppliers Association v. Michael Huerta

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2017

I wish the notice had gone through notice and comment so that we could have actually pointed out to the FAA that the notice isn't getting us to an end point that we need to be at. … I wish the system was as clean as you had just described it. I'm asking how you understand the requirement. All right? When do you think they have to have—a broken engine has come in.

Oral argument — Whistler Investments v. The Depository Trust

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2008

As Judge Thomas wrote in the air conditioning case, we look at the structure and the purpose of the statute as a whole. As a whole. … The commission's disagreement with those facts is irrelevant in this context, period.

Oral argument — Irvine Leen v. Harold Thomas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

Apparently there was some criminal proceedings because the gentleman was cleaning the ditch. Yes, Your Honor. … How do you get charged criminally for cleaning your own ditch? I don't understand. Yes, Your Honor. It was a, Mr. Lean and a, and a tenant on his property were cleaning the ditch during the summer.

Oral argument — Avila v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2022

The latter I'm interested in, but we were interested in the BIA cleaning up its own precedent, right? Cleaning up its own authority here. … If the proceeding does afford defendants those rights, then a judgment of guilt in that proceeding constitutes a conviction under the Act.

Oral argument — Massaro v. The Department of E

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019

There's nothing for us here on this record to say that the only opportunity for her U rating was that period of time. … That the whole school was air-conditioned, but she was assigned to one room that was not air-conditioned?

Oral argument — Elton Cansler v. Alan A. Hanks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2019

Something has to be done to clean it up. Well, that's with regard to . . . To have 1291 jurisdiction. … He has not committed a criminal act. He's not accused of committing a criminal act, and he simply won't let go of the post that he's attached to. Mr.

Oral argument — Rexnord Industries, LLC v. Habasit Belting Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2015

And the third point is that, let me check my notes here, it eases cleaning, which I guess is somewhat associated with reduction of turbulence, but as you're wanting to clean either the belt or the items … Cross commented that there was a withholding of a reference, Ensch, during original prosecution.

Oral argument — APAC v. BPA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2013

, but a period after 2028, equal to $2,050,000,000, $2.05 billion. … They didn't just pick it out of the air. Well, it's not just picked out of the air, but the point is you can't start with the rep benefit and work backwards because it's...

Oral argument — Pinckney v. The Pep Boys

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2021

And this is not just one comment from a supervisor, it's comments from the supervisor and other employees there. Is that a hostile retail environment under 1981B? … Morton's comment of air it up and get it out to a refusal to service, Mr. Morton tried to service them.