Documents

Oral argument — Jenna R.P. v. City of Chicago School District 299

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2013

Not having been there, I can't comment on the actual curricular… Is there anything in the record that you can point us to that would indicate that there were specially designed academic classes for Jenna … And therefore, even if your damages might be capped, say, by way of analogy, the Fair Labor Standards Act works that way.

Oral argument — People v. Herring

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2022

Doesn't the post conviction hearing act and Supreme Court case law. … They don't get a special pass under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act.

Oral argument — People v. Reed

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 24, 2016

I mean, obviously she's the attorney who the court appointed, but she was acting against her client's interest in that case. … That's my understanding right now, but my memory is not perfect on that, Judge, so I don't want to comment further on that.

Oral argument — In re Trust of Butcher

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2017

My point being, they have to act, and they're locked in at that point, so giving Bill and Paul exactly what they agreed to. … When I say it abandoned its duty, I guess that maybe is a strong comment. I suppose it is.

Oral argument — City of East Peoria v. Melton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2022

Substantial period of time. Substantial period of time. And we would be the first court to say that it does not mean that an in-person examination is required. Is that right? … Did the board actually make comments that they were going with an inpatient or, I mean, a non, you know, patient review because of COVID? No, your honor. In fact, I think the pension board. Yeah.

Oral argument — Guns Save Life, Inc. v. Ali

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2020

And the county is somewhat in between a rock and a hard place here because they are preempted from regulating by the Freud Card Act and the Firearm Concealed Carry Act, which is why they're insisting. … Well, my recollection is that it was over a six-month period and they compared the same six-month period to prior year.

Oral argument — Dixon v. Weitekamp-Diller

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2012

The Probating Act was amended in large part, and in large part the purpose of that amendment was to codify Cross. Now, the legislature codifies decisions as an act of approval. Isn't that so? … Isn't there a two-year period where they have to live? Yes, that's right. Well, that did... Certainly the last... I don't think any of the four that were adopted. That's right.

Oral argument — Illinois Baptist State Ass'n v. Illinois Department of Insurance

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 26, 2025

Read the Book for Health Act? Yes, sir. Okay. … With the case we have before us here, I would just like to note that the Association never made a claim below or made an argument below that the comments made by the legislators are somehow part of the

Oral argument — Division-Gaylord, LLC v. Konopka

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2019

The Court's comment is intriguing. I would have to. Lack of standing is sort of an overlay. It's something I missed. … How can the Cook County judge appoint him in a Cook County case to come down and act in Will County?

Oral argument — Holten v. Android Industries Belvidere LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2019

Lowery, the issue is the interpretation of Section 1A4 of the Workers' Com Act. As the questions indicated, the Act is very clear. … It would be nice to have a period there, but comma. And then it goes on to the next section. Actually, let's reread that section.

Oral argument — Hassebrock v. Deep Rock Energy Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2014

Look at his comments that he made over and over again while we were talking about the motion, the joint or the parties. … And then the question of who is supposed to physically pay the money would be determined by the Illinois Oil and Gas Rights Act.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Kundert

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2011

The issue is was he acting in the role of that person's physician at the time it occurred. … Giff's arguments was along that line that the fallout could be that they just said, we simply are not going to talk to anybody over the phone, period.

Oral argument — Excalibur Energy Co. v. Rochman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2016

So your preliminary comments about this isn't related to that, I'm having trouble with, because that's, at least according to the pleadings I reviewed, there's some conflict in what you've said and what … And that the only case present in tax titles period is Divine Bank, which involved a 21401 alongside a timely two year 22454 collateral attack.

Oral argument — Benedict v. County Wide Landscaping, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2011

So, again, there would have to be this meeting of the minds and definitive terms as to what are we rescinding, what are the terms of payment, how much is going to be paid overall over what period of time … So it's difficult to comment on what the sufficiency of the evidence may have been at the trial level for that purpose.

Oral argument — People v. Zemater

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 27, 2020

Before we begin, let me make a few comments about our format today. Just as if we were in the courthouse, you'll be given your regular allotted time of 15 minutes. … The people fully recognize that defendant has a right to avail himself of the court system and to act as his own counsel.

Oral argument — Jayko v. Fraczek

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2012

Would that be a fair comment? I do, I assure you. All right. Well, now, Judge Maddox and Judge Sulganic, I think, was there another judge? … I think at the very least that notice of lien should be sent to the partner's name and period.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Martin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2020

It's obviously a period pro se. However, you have the Supreme Court case of Hamer versus Lentz. … You have any comment as to what exactly the issues are in that case that might be relevant to this case?

Oral argument — Selby v. State Farm Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2020

If you get past this case, take, for example, a medical malpractice case where you've got a medical studies act, for example, which has privileged peer review. … He commented on the substance of those documents, didn't he? He commented on the absence of the substance. So if you're trying to prove a negative, where does it end?

Oral argument — 1-18-1728

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021

So it's not whether he actually acted diligently, his counsel acted diligently in seeking him. It's whether diligent action could have produced this evidence. And here we know it could not. … And that is not how the post-conviction hearing act is written.

Oral argument — Parentage of A.H.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2022

That means that the act applies. And under what section of the act? It's 106, excuse me, 102 of the act. 102? I'm sorry. 102 is the definitions. 105A3, is that what you're basing it on? … Bargiel's objective comments aside, Mr. Higginbotham, Mr. Higginbotham is not the first man walking the earth to deny parenting.