Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.74s
Oral argument — Mustafa Al Hawsawi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2019
And most notably, one of the first acts in the first month he was on the bench was to request an ex parte proceeding. And I'll characterize that most specifically. … So Judge Perella was nominated by the TJAC for the Navy, and the TJAC for the Army, and the TJAC for the Air Force also nominate people.
48 min of audioOral argument — Eric Friedman v. FAA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2016
Friedman knows why his application has not been acted upon, or granted, I think. That's what it says in its brief. … And it would be able to show the federal air surgeon over a period of time any insidious changes in Mr.
43 min of audioOral argument — Gary Tederick v. Loancare, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2026
And let me tell you, that lets me go back to the underlying substantive claims, the underlying ACT claims, because the ACT deals with this situation in three different places. … Help me clean my mind up on that, if you will, because I'm kind of stuck on that right now. Okay.
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Billy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2024
Why don't you just comment quickly on the waiver issue? … And that act was done unquestionably with the intent to injure him.
17 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ashley Grayson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 29, 2025
So with Murdoch, they do apply the clean hand exception to this 2515 issue of the U.S. Aren't we split with many of the circuits on that? Absolutely, Your Honor. … Even if the judge made an improper comment, and I think he roundaboutly admitted it, he was, then he gave a curative instruction that was a prompt and explicit curative instruction.
29 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Sylvan D. Abney, AppellantX
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2020
You have to wipe the slate clean or reconsider the sentence. And if you impose the same sentence, explain why you're adhering to that sentence based on what the defendant actually said. … Only once the court began to impose sentence was he aware that, no, this opportunity was not going to be extended to him and that he needed to act in order to obtain it.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Antonio Brown
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2026
So let's assume for a second that it is, you can do this in the plain air context. Let's talk about whether it should be done in prong one or prong two. … So if the whole thing was being scrapped to start over from a clean slate, everyone might look at this differently.
36 min of audioOral argument — Isaac Rodriguez v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2019
Unlike the, you gotta clean your gun if you get mud on it, or your uniform, or whatever. Is that correct? Yes, Your Honor. … Do you have other comments you want to make? Yes, Your Honor.
32 min of audioOral argument — Kava Holdings, LLC v. NLRB
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2022
And viewed retrospectively, throughout that period of time, the owner of the business was doing his best to drum up new business so he could reopen. … First of all, that argument is not before the court, and the court, in fact, does not have jurisdiction to consider the argument under Section 10e of the Act because the employer did not raise it before
54 min of audioOral argument — Christophersen v. Franklin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2011
The final comment on the Barrett case, I don't believe the Barrett case has any application. … How do you factor in or put in context a successor counsel's testimony that he thought what he was going to do was just clean up the mistakes or clean up the case?
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2017
Sitko's plan was to use that third tank and basically shuttle the three tanks around in dry weather periods in order to clean the other two tanks. That was the plan that was in place at the time. … Polluters are, in effect, here CITGO is, in effect, saying it's fine to benefit to the tune of $11 million from violating the Clean Water Act.
41 min of audioOral argument — Board of Trustees of Riverdale Police v. Village of Riverdale
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 29, 2014
And he could not comment whether there was financial damage here or not. Our expert witnesses indicated that there was financial damage to the fund. … But the legislature has, at least twice now, continued the period of when the pension funds have to be fully funded.
35 min of audioOral argument — Pinckney v. The Pep Boys
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2021
And this is not just one comment from a supervisor, it's comments from the supervisor and other employees there. Is that a hostile retail environment under 1981B? … Morton's comment of air it up and get it out to a refusal to service, Mr. Morton tried to service them.
47 min of audioOral argument — Travis v. Knappenberger
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2003
Walmart stores-in case, 11th Circuit, 141F3rd, at page 1456, includes making negative comments about the employee. … And it would be helpful to me if you would boil it down, give me a nice clean schematic of how you see it. Okay.
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. State of Mississippi
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2022
The 16 institutionalizations weren't all during that two-year period. I'm sure they weren't. … Why does the U.S. choose Title II over the Rehabilitation Act?
48 min of audioOral argument — Michael Bracey v. Lancaster Foods LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2020
I thought that if we're talking about a motion to reconsider after a judgment's entered, we're not looking at your FAA exemption argument with a clean slate. … If you have with a clean slate, I'd appreciate you giving us that authority. I do not have that authority with me now. Okay. Yeah. All righty.
37 min of audioOral argument — SaurikIT, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2023
The law is equally clear that acts of enforcement during the limitations period are overt acts that are sufficient for a continuing violation. … And that is an overt act within the limitations period that's causing injury by that very act.
30 min of audioOral argument — Ohio Nuclear-Free Network v. NRC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2022
We want to do something much bigger over a longer period of time. Here's our new license application. … Atomic Energy Commission in 1973, the DC circuit stated that the Hobbs Act applies to proceedings where the public can participate only by commenting. We believe further that the Massachusetts v.
34 min of audioOral argument — People v. Davidson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2023
That's after a period of time taking this medication. There's no evidence here of, you know, if you take one pill, how is that going to affect that number? How is it going to make it go up and down? … The basis for how he determined this was a vague generalized calculation, and the number that was referenced earlier, 70 to 100 pills, was a number he just crafted or, you know, created out of thin air
46 min of audioOral argument — Elizabeth Powell v. Sherman Hatcher
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010
The Court noted that, you know, how she had, at least to a certain extent, cleaned up her act by not having meth available, methamphetamine available to her. … Now, let's see, with respect to the do-you-too comment by Mr. Leavitt, once again, let's assume that you take that away. You still have her other admissions. You still have Mr. Berkman's testimony.
21 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.